成人人工耳蜗植入对交流伙伴残疾和生活质量的影响:系统综述。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jessica C Goodwin, Monica C Amarante, Mayuri S Patel, Prishae Wilson, Tara Brigham, Mallory J Raymond
{"title":"成人人工耳蜗植入对交流伙伴残疾和生活质量的影响:系统综述。","authors":"Jessica C Goodwin, Monica C Amarante, Mayuri S Patel, Prishae Wilson, Tara Brigham, Mallory J Raymond","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess the impact of adult cochlear implantation on the disability and quality of life (QOL) of communication partners (CP) of cochlear implant (CI) recipients.</p><p><strong>Databases reviewed: </strong>PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Emerging Sources Citation Index were searched.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was reported following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles included reported on disability or QOL measures of CP of adult CI recipients. Study selection included retrospective, prospective, and randomized controlled studies in English language. Three reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Outcomes included both qualitative and quantitative pre-CI and post-CI measures of CP disability or QOL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1615 screened articles, 9 studies utilizing quantitative and qualitative measures with 504 CP met inclusion criteria. Four of 6 studies assessing only post-CI CP QOL, demonstrated self-reported improvement, while one demonstrated worse CP QOL compared with the general population and one identified CP and CI recipient qualities that correlated with CP QOL scores. Two studies assessing pre-CI to post-CI CP QOL also reported improvements. One study assessing only pre-CI CP QOL suggested that CPs had worse QOL than normal hearing controls. Duration of CI recipient hearing loss did not impact CP QOL in any study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though homogenous data on the QOL of CPs of CI recipients and the relationship between CI recipient and CP factors is limited, studies suggest that CPs of CI recipients may have worse QOL than the general population but, cochlear implantation may improve CP QOL.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Adult Cochlear Implantation on Communication Partner Disability and Quality of Life: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica C Goodwin, Monica C Amarante, Mayuri S Patel, Prishae Wilson, Tara Brigham, Mallory J Raymond\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess the impact of adult cochlear implantation on the disability and quality of life (QOL) of communication partners (CP) of cochlear implant (CI) recipients.</p><p><strong>Databases reviewed: </strong>PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Emerging Sources Citation Index were searched.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was reported following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles included reported on disability or QOL measures of CP of adult CI recipients. Study selection included retrospective, prospective, and randomized controlled studies in English language. Three reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Outcomes included both qualitative and quantitative pre-CI and post-CI measures of CP disability or QOL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1615 screened articles, 9 studies utilizing quantitative and qualitative measures with 504 CP met inclusion criteria. Four of 6 studies assessing only post-CI CP QOL, demonstrated self-reported improvement, while one demonstrated worse CP QOL compared with the general population and one identified CP and CI recipient qualities that correlated with CP QOL scores. Two studies assessing pre-CI to post-CI CP QOL also reported improvements. One study assessing only pre-CI CP QOL suggested that CPs had worse QOL than normal hearing controls. Duration of CI recipient hearing loss did not impact CP QOL in any study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though homogenous data on the QOL of CPs of CI recipients and the relationship between CI recipient and CP factors is limited, studies suggest that CPs of CI recipients may have worse QOL than the general population but, cochlear implantation may improve CP QOL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004633\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价成人人工耳蜗植入术对人工耳蜗(CI)受术者交流伴侣(CP)残疾及生活质量(QOL)的影响。检索数据库:PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Science Citation Index Expanded和Emerging Sources Citation Index。方法:本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行报道。文章包括关于成人CI受者CP的残疾或生活质量测量的报道。研究选择包括英语语言的回顾性、前瞻性和随机对照研究。三位审稿人独立筛选研究纳入、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。结果包括CP残疾或生活质量的定性和定量ci前和ci后测量。结果:在1615篇筛选的文章中,有9篇采用定量和定性方法的研究符合纳入标准。仅评估CI后CP生活质量的6项研究中有4项显示自我报告的改善,而一项显示CP生活质量比一般人群更差,一项确定CP和CI接受者的质量与CP生活质量评分相关。两项评估ci前至ci后CP生活质量的研究也报告了改善。一项仅评估ci前CP生活质量的研究表明,CP的生活质量比正常听力对照组差。在任何研究中,CI受者听力损失的持续时间不影响CP生活质量。结论:虽然关于CI受术者CP的生活质量以及CI受术者与CP因素之间关系的同质数据有限,但研究表明CI受术者CP的生活质量可能比一般人群差,但人工耳蜗植入术可改善CP的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Adult Cochlear Implantation on Communication Partner Disability and Quality of Life: A Systematic Review.

Objective: Assess the impact of adult cochlear implantation on the disability and quality of life (QOL) of communication partners (CP) of cochlear implant (CI) recipients.

Databases reviewed: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Emerging Sources Citation Index were searched.

Methods: This study was reported following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles included reported on disability or QOL measures of CP of adult CI recipients. Study selection included retrospective, prospective, and randomized controlled studies in English language. Three reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Outcomes included both qualitative and quantitative pre-CI and post-CI measures of CP disability or QOL.

Results: Of 1615 screened articles, 9 studies utilizing quantitative and qualitative measures with 504 CP met inclusion criteria. Four of 6 studies assessing only post-CI CP QOL, demonstrated self-reported improvement, while one demonstrated worse CP QOL compared with the general population and one identified CP and CI recipient qualities that correlated with CP QOL scores. Two studies assessing pre-CI to post-CI CP QOL also reported improvements. One study assessing only pre-CI CP QOL suggested that CPs had worse QOL than normal hearing controls. Duration of CI recipient hearing loss did not impact CP QOL in any study.

Conclusions: Though homogenous data on the QOL of CPs of CI recipients and the relationship between CI recipient and CP factors is limited, studies suggest that CPs of CI recipients may have worse QOL than the general population but, cochlear implantation may improve CP QOL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信