迷走神经刺激治疗耐药癫痫的预后和预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Robert Crutcher, David Horvat, Nicholas Lehman, Yitao Ma
{"title":"迷走神经刺激治疗耐药癫痫的预后和预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Robert Crutcher, David Horvat, Nicholas Lehman, Yitao Ma","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03839-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been used as an adjunctive therapy for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) for decades. Nonetheless, the predictors of response to VNS remain inadequately characterized. We aimed to find factors associated with responder status. We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who received VNS for DRE in our medical center between 2000 and 2023. Preoperative data and VNS parameters were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analysis to identify predictors associated with responder status. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to select possible related factors and the cutoff values. The overall responder rate was 35.8%. Individuals with generalized epilepsy demonstrated significantly higher responder rates (86%) compared to those with focal (29%) or combined epilepsy (28%). Univariate analysis indicated that an epilepsy duration of < 5 years at the time of VNS implantation (p = 0.021) and a diagnosis of generalized epilepsy (p = 0.016) were associated with a favorable response. A multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed these findings. There was no correlation between age at implantation, prior epilepsy surgery, VNS parameters, such as output current and duty cycle, and the responder status. An epilepsy duration of < 5 years at VNS implantation and generalized epilepsy are independent predictors of responder status to VNS. Future long-term, randomized controlled trials with larger cohorts are needed to better evaluate these critical variables and their association with VNS outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"676"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome and predictors of response to vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Crutcher, David Horvat, Nicholas Lehman, Yitao Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03839-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been used as an adjunctive therapy for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) for decades. Nonetheless, the predictors of response to VNS remain inadequately characterized. We aimed to find factors associated with responder status. We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who received VNS for DRE in our medical center between 2000 and 2023. Preoperative data and VNS parameters were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analysis to identify predictors associated with responder status. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to select possible related factors and the cutoff values. The overall responder rate was 35.8%. Individuals with generalized epilepsy demonstrated significantly higher responder rates (86%) compared to those with focal (29%) or combined epilepsy (28%). Univariate analysis indicated that an epilepsy duration of < 5 years at the time of VNS implantation (p = 0.021) and a diagnosis of generalized epilepsy (p = 0.016) were associated with a favorable response. A multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed these findings. There was no correlation between age at implantation, prior epilepsy surgery, VNS parameters, such as output current and duty cycle, and the responder status. An epilepsy duration of < 5 years at VNS implantation and generalized epilepsy are independent predictors of responder status to VNS. Future long-term, randomized controlled trials with larger cohorts are needed to better evaluate these critical variables and their association with VNS outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"676\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494630/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03839-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03839-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

迷走神经刺激(VNS)作为治疗耐药癫痫(DRE)的辅助疗法已有几十年的历史。尽管如此,对VNS反应的预测因素仍然没有充分表征。我们的目的是找出与应答者状态相关的因素。我们回顾性地回顾了2000年至2023年在我们医疗中心接受VNS治疗DRE的患者记录。术前数据和VNS参数通过单因素和多因素分析进行分析,以确定与应答者状态相关的预测因素。我们使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来选择可能的相关因素和截止值。总体回复率为35.8%。与局灶性癫痫患者(29%)或合并癫痫患者(28%)相比,全身性癫痫患者的应答率(86%)明显更高。单因素分析表明癫痫持续时间为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outcome and predictors of response to vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a retrospective cohort study.

Outcome and predictors of response to vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a retrospective cohort study.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been used as an adjunctive therapy for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) for decades. Nonetheless, the predictors of response to VNS remain inadequately characterized. We aimed to find factors associated with responder status. We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who received VNS for DRE in our medical center between 2000 and 2023. Preoperative data and VNS parameters were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analysis to identify predictors associated with responder status. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to select possible related factors and the cutoff values. The overall responder rate was 35.8%. Individuals with generalized epilepsy demonstrated significantly higher responder rates (86%) compared to those with focal (29%) or combined epilepsy (28%). Univariate analysis indicated that an epilepsy duration of < 5 years at the time of VNS implantation (p = 0.021) and a diagnosis of generalized epilepsy (p = 0.016) were associated with a favorable response. A multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed these findings. There was no correlation between age at implantation, prior epilepsy surgery, VNS parameters, such as output current and duty cycle, and the responder status. An epilepsy duration of < 5 years at VNS implantation and generalized epilepsy are independent predictors of responder status to VNS. Future long-term, randomized controlled trials with larger cohorts are needed to better evaluate these critical variables and their association with VNS outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信