Jusung Lee, Krista J Howard, Amanda M Ryan, Ria Jain, Hafsa B Imran, Jeffrey T Howard
{"title":"美国避孕偏好-使用匹配的种族/民族和社会经济差异。","authors":"Jusung Lee, Krista J Howard, Amanda M Ryan, Ria Jain, Hafsa B Imran, Jeffrey T Howard","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02667-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine factors associated with a contraceptive preference-use match, defined as alignment between an individual's stated contraceptive preference and actual use, in the USA, with a focus on disparities across demographic and socioeconomic groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The population-based study used the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The key outcome was a match between contraceptive preference and actual use. Independent variables included demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate significant factors associated with contraceptive matches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 12,154 participants, the most preferred contraceptive method was short-acting reversible contraception (SAC) (29.5%), followed by long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) (25.0%), permanent (19.1%), and other/barrier methods (17.4%). Approximately 81.0% of participants were contraceptive users, and the overall contraceptive preference-use match was 45.8%. LARC showed the highest match rate (49.0%), followed by other/barriers (46.7%), SAC (38.3%), and permanent methods (33.7%). While Black individuals had a higher match rate with permanent methods (OR 1.83), they had a lower match rate with LARC (OR 0.65) and SAC (OR 0.42). In contrast, participants aged 40-44 years had 1.61 times greater odds of LARC matches. Individuals with higher education levels also showed a greater match than those with less than a high school diploma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight that racial/ethnic minorities and individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) experience a lower preference-use match of LARC and SAC, while individuals with low SES show greater matches for other/barrier methods. Addressing these disparities may enhance reproductive autonomy and equitable access to contraceptives.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities of Contraceptive Preference-Use Match in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Jusung Lee, Krista J Howard, Amanda M Ryan, Ria Jain, Hafsa B Imran, Jeffrey T Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-025-02667-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine factors associated with a contraceptive preference-use match, defined as alignment between an individual's stated contraceptive preference and actual use, in the USA, with a focus on disparities across demographic and socioeconomic groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The population-based study used the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The key outcome was a match between contraceptive preference and actual use. Independent variables included demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate significant factors associated with contraceptive matches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 12,154 participants, the most preferred contraceptive method was short-acting reversible contraception (SAC) (29.5%), followed by long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) (25.0%), permanent (19.1%), and other/barrier methods (17.4%). Approximately 81.0% of participants were contraceptive users, and the overall contraceptive preference-use match was 45.8%. LARC showed the highest match rate (49.0%), followed by other/barriers (46.7%), SAC (38.3%), and permanent methods (33.7%). While Black individuals had a higher match rate with permanent methods (OR 1.83), they had a lower match rate with LARC (OR 0.65) and SAC (OR 0.42). In contrast, participants aged 40-44 years had 1.61 times greater odds of LARC matches. Individuals with higher education levels also showed a greater match than those with less than a high school diploma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight that racial/ethnic minorities and individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) experience a lower preference-use match of LARC and SAC, while individuals with low SES show greater matches for other/barrier methods. Addressing these disparities may enhance reproductive autonomy and equitable access to contraceptives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02667-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02667-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities of Contraceptive Preference-Use Match in the United States.
Objectives: To examine factors associated with a contraceptive preference-use match, defined as alignment between an individual's stated contraceptive preference and actual use, in the USA, with a focus on disparities across demographic and socioeconomic groups.
Methods: The population-based study used the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The key outcome was a match between contraceptive preference and actual use. Independent variables included demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate significant factors associated with contraceptive matches.
Results: Of a total of 12,154 participants, the most preferred contraceptive method was short-acting reversible contraception (SAC) (29.5%), followed by long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) (25.0%), permanent (19.1%), and other/barrier methods (17.4%). Approximately 81.0% of participants were contraceptive users, and the overall contraceptive preference-use match was 45.8%. LARC showed the highest match rate (49.0%), followed by other/barriers (46.7%), SAC (38.3%), and permanent methods (33.7%). While Black individuals had a higher match rate with permanent methods (OR 1.83), they had a lower match rate with LARC (OR 0.65) and SAC (OR 0.42). In contrast, participants aged 40-44 years had 1.61 times greater odds of LARC matches. Individuals with higher education levels also showed a greater match than those with less than a high school diploma.
Conclusions: Findings highlight that racial/ethnic minorities and individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) experience a lower preference-use match of LARC and SAC, while individuals with low SES show greater matches for other/barrier methods. Addressing these disparities may enhance reproductive autonomy and equitable access to contraceptives.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.