现场时空步态再训练依从性与音乐听觉提示改善。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Erin Lally, Hayley Ericksen, Razia Azen, Wendy Huddleston, Jennifer Earl-Boehm
{"title":"现场时空步态再训练依从性与音乐听觉提示改善。","authors":"Erin Lally, Hayley Ericksen, Razia Azen, Wendy Huddleston, Jennifer Earl-Boehm","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2568250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In-field gait retraining using metronomes is a common sports medicine intervention. Many runners prefer to listen to music. Removing music may impact exercise performance and possibly gait retraining adherence. Increased step-rate accuracy and adherence were compared between music and metronome in-field gait retraining. Thirty healthy individuals were allocated to groups (music or metronome) then completed a pretest running assessment while step-rate was collected. Target step-rate was calculated (+5% above preferred). After five in-lab, guided gait retraining sessions, participants were told to continue practicing on their own for approximately 1-month while step-rate and running mileage were monitored remotely via an app. Participants returned for a posttest to collect step-rate and were categorized as adherent or nonadherent based on their monthly activity. A 2 × 2repeated measures ANOVA was performed to determine differences in step-rate (group by time). A Fisher's exact test and odds ratio examined the relationship between group and adherence. The music and metronome groups increased step-rate (<i>p</i> < .001) from pretest to posttest. A significant association between group and adherence was found (<i>p</i> = .045). The music group was more adherent to in-field gait retraining. Music and metronome auditory cueing effectively increased step-rate, but music auditory cueing led to improved adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-field temporospatial gait retraining adherence improves with music auditory cueing.\",\"authors\":\"Erin Lally, Hayley Ericksen, Razia Azen, Wendy Huddleston, Jennifer Earl-Boehm\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2568250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In-field gait retraining using metronomes is a common sports medicine intervention. Many runners prefer to listen to music. Removing music may impact exercise performance and possibly gait retraining adherence. Increased step-rate accuracy and adherence were compared between music and metronome in-field gait retraining. Thirty healthy individuals were allocated to groups (music or metronome) then completed a pretest running assessment while step-rate was collected. Target step-rate was calculated (+5% above preferred). After five in-lab, guided gait retraining sessions, participants were told to continue practicing on their own for approximately 1-month while step-rate and running mileage were monitored remotely via an app. Participants returned for a posttest to collect step-rate and were categorized as adherent or nonadherent based on their monthly activity. A 2 × 2repeated measures ANOVA was performed to determine differences in step-rate (group by time). A Fisher's exact test and odds ratio examined the relationship between group and adherence. The music and metronome groups increased step-rate (<i>p</i> < .001) from pretest to posttest. A significant association between group and adherence was found (<i>p</i> = .045). The music group was more adherent to in-field gait retraining. Music and metronome auditory cueing effectively increased step-rate, but music auditory cueing led to improved adherence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2568250\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2568250","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用节拍器进行现场步态再训练是一种常见的运动医学干预。许多跑步者喜欢听音乐。不听音乐可能会影响运动表现,并可能影响步态再训练的依从性。比较了音乐和节拍器现场步态再训练之间增加的步速准确性和依从性。30名健康个体被分配到不同的组(音乐组或节拍器组),然后完成测试前的跑步评估,同时收集步速。计算目标步速(优先+5%)。在实验室进行了五次有指导的步态再训练后,参与者被告知继续自己练习大约一个月,同时通过应用程序远程监测步速和跑步里程。参与者返回后测试以收集步速,并根据他们每月的活动将其分类为坚持或不坚持。采用2 × 2重复测量方差分析(repeated measures ANOVA)确定两组患者的步速差异(按时间分组)。Fisher精确检验和比值比检验了组与依从性之间的关系。音乐组和节拍器组增加了步速(p p = 0.045)。音乐组更坚持现场步态再训练。音乐和节拍器的听觉提示有效地提高了步速,但音乐听觉提示提高了依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In-field temporospatial gait retraining adherence improves with music auditory cueing.

In-field gait retraining using metronomes is a common sports medicine intervention. Many runners prefer to listen to music. Removing music may impact exercise performance and possibly gait retraining adherence. Increased step-rate accuracy and adherence were compared between music and metronome in-field gait retraining. Thirty healthy individuals were allocated to groups (music or metronome) then completed a pretest running assessment while step-rate was collected. Target step-rate was calculated (+5% above preferred). After five in-lab, guided gait retraining sessions, participants were told to continue practicing on their own for approximately 1-month while step-rate and running mileage were monitored remotely via an app. Participants returned for a posttest to collect step-rate and were categorized as adherent or nonadherent based on their monthly activity. A 2 × 2repeated measures ANOVA was performed to determine differences in step-rate (group by time). A Fisher's exact test and odds ratio examined the relationship between group and adherence. The music and metronome groups increased step-rate (p < .001) from pretest to posttest. A significant association between group and adherence was found (p = .045). The music group was more adherent to in-field gait retraining. Music and metronome auditory cueing effectively increased step-rate, but music auditory cueing led to improved adherence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信