重新评估接受格列美脲与胰岛素双疗法的2型糖尿病患者的心脏代谢应激。

IF 1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
S Jim Jebastin, Nivedita Nanda, Jayaprakash Sahoo, Dhanalakshmi Yerrabelli
{"title":"重新评估接受格列美脲与胰岛素双疗法的2型糖尿病患者的心脏代谢应激。","authors":"S Jim Jebastin, Nivedita Nanda, Jayaprakash Sahoo, Dhanalakshmi Yerrabelli","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1751_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metformin and glimepiride are the most common oral antidiabetic drugs in India, and are used with other oral hypoglycaemic agents either separately or in combination with insulin. The objective of the present study was to compare the differences in cardiometabolic markers between metformin-glimepiride therapy versus metformin-insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We divided T2D patients into two groups. Group 1 patients were treated with metformin-glimepiride and group 2 patients were treated with metformin-insulin combination. We estimated serum insulin, hs CRP, asymmetric dimethyl arginine (ADMA), Endoglin, 8OHdG, and sEndoglin levels. Cardiac autonomic function was assessed using ECG tracings to record heart rate variability (HRV) and blood pressure variability (BPV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most important BPV parameter, baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) was significantly lower in Group 2. A significant decrease in time-domain indices of HRV was observed in group 2, suggesting sympathovagal imbalance in metformin-insulin-treated patients. Serum NO and TAS levels were low, while sEndoglin, 8OHdG, and PSS were high in group 2, suggesting higher oxidative stress, although the level of hsCRP, indicating inflammation, was similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The glimepiride-metformin combination was more effective against vascular dysfunction, sympathovagal balance, metabolic stress, and inflammation. Cardiometabolic mediators of cardiovascular risk were higher in metformin-insulin-treated patients, despite achieving similar glycemic targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"14 8","pages":"3394-3400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reappraisal of cardiometabolic stress in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients receiving glimepiride versus insulin under bitherapy.\",\"authors\":\"S Jim Jebastin, Nivedita Nanda, Jayaprakash Sahoo, Dhanalakshmi Yerrabelli\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1751_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metformin and glimepiride are the most common oral antidiabetic drugs in India, and are used with other oral hypoglycaemic agents either separately or in combination with insulin. The objective of the present study was to compare the differences in cardiometabolic markers between metformin-glimepiride therapy versus metformin-insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We divided T2D patients into two groups. Group 1 patients were treated with metformin-glimepiride and group 2 patients were treated with metformin-insulin combination. We estimated serum insulin, hs CRP, asymmetric dimethyl arginine (ADMA), Endoglin, 8OHdG, and sEndoglin levels. Cardiac autonomic function was assessed using ECG tracings to record heart rate variability (HRV) and blood pressure variability (BPV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most important BPV parameter, baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) was significantly lower in Group 2. A significant decrease in time-domain indices of HRV was observed in group 2, suggesting sympathovagal imbalance in metformin-insulin-treated patients. Serum NO and TAS levels were low, while sEndoglin, 8OHdG, and PSS were high in group 2, suggesting higher oxidative stress, although the level of hsCRP, indicating inflammation, was similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The glimepiride-metformin combination was more effective against vascular dysfunction, sympathovagal balance, metabolic stress, and inflammation. Cardiometabolic mediators of cardiovascular risk were higher in metformin-insulin-treated patients, despite achieving similar glycemic targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"volume\":\"14 8\",\"pages\":\"3394-3400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488102/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1751_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1751_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:二甲双胍和格列美脲是印度最常见的口服降糖药,可与其他口服降糖药单独或与胰岛素合用。本研究的目的是比较二甲双胍-格列美脲治疗与二甲双胍-胰岛素治疗对2型糖尿病(T2D)患者心脏代谢标志物的差异。材料与方法:将T2D患者分为两组。组1患者采用二甲双胍-格列美脲治疗,组2患者采用二甲双胍-胰岛素联合治疗。我们评估了血清胰岛素、hs CRP、不对称二甲基精氨酸(ADMA)、内啡肽、8OHdG和sEndoglin水平。通过心电图跟踪记录心率变异性(HRV)和血压变异性(BPV)来评估心脏自主神经功能。结果:组2最重要的BPV参数气压反射敏感性(barrefflex sensitivity, BRS)明显降低。2组HRV时域指数明显下降,提示二甲双胍-胰岛素治疗患者交感迷走神经失衡。血清NO和TAS水平较低,而sEndoglin, 8OHdG和PSS水平较高,提示氧化应激较高,尽管两组中显示炎症的hsCRP水平相似。结论:格列美脲-二甲双胍联合用药对血管功能障碍、交感迷走神经平衡、代谢应激和炎症有较好的治疗效果。二甲双胍-胰岛素治疗的患者心血管风险的心血管代谢介质更高,尽管达到了相似的血糖目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reappraisal of cardiometabolic stress in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients receiving glimepiride versus insulin under bitherapy.

Background: Metformin and glimepiride are the most common oral antidiabetic drugs in India, and are used with other oral hypoglycaemic agents either separately or in combination with insulin. The objective of the present study was to compare the differences in cardiometabolic markers between metformin-glimepiride therapy versus metformin-insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).

Materials and methods: We divided T2D patients into two groups. Group 1 patients were treated with metformin-glimepiride and group 2 patients were treated with metformin-insulin combination. We estimated serum insulin, hs CRP, asymmetric dimethyl arginine (ADMA), Endoglin, 8OHdG, and sEndoglin levels. Cardiac autonomic function was assessed using ECG tracings to record heart rate variability (HRV) and blood pressure variability (BPV).

Results: The most important BPV parameter, baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) was significantly lower in Group 2. A significant decrease in time-domain indices of HRV was observed in group 2, suggesting sympathovagal imbalance in metformin-insulin-treated patients. Serum NO and TAS levels were low, while sEndoglin, 8OHdG, and PSS were high in group 2, suggesting higher oxidative stress, although the level of hsCRP, indicating inflammation, was similar in both groups.

Conclusion: The glimepiride-metformin combination was more effective against vascular dysfunction, sympathovagal balance, metabolic stress, and inflammation. Cardiometabolic mediators of cardiovascular risk were higher in metformin-insulin-treated patients, despite achieving similar glycemic targets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信