ChatGPT作为治疗:对Reddit上的共享经历、态度和信仰进行定性和基于网络的主题分析。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Amanda C. Collins , Damien Lekkas , Michael V. Heinz , Janelle Annor , Franklin Ruan , Nicholas C. Jacobson
{"title":"ChatGPT作为治疗:对Reddit上的共享经历、态度和信仰进行定性和基于网络的主题分析。","authors":"Amanda C. Collins ,&nbsp;Damien Lekkas ,&nbsp;Michael V. Heinz ,&nbsp;Janelle Annor ,&nbsp;Franklin Ruan ,&nbsp;Nicholas C. Jacobson","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.09.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, large language models (LLMs), including ChatGPT, have exponentially grown in application. Given existing barriers to mental health services, alongside the capability of LLMs to generate therapeutic responses, LLMs have potential to serve as accessible precursors, adjuncts, or alternatives to traditional therapy. However, little is known about the opinions of persons who have used LLMs for mental health-related problems. Thus, the current work investigated the positive and negative experiences of those who have interacted with ChatGPT for their mental health using posts from relevant Reddit threads (<em>N</em> = 1594). A 33-item coding scheme was applied to code the presence/absence of each item, and coded posts were modeled using an Ising network graph to explore pairwise and groupwise thematic associations of items. Results from the qualitative coding indicated that the codes representing positive sentiment, experiencing affect/emotion, and attaining personal benefit from using ChatGPT for therapy were among the most frequently coded. Moreover, the Ising network model revealed the most important associations were between items representing positive experiences with ChatGPT (e.g., it performs better than a human therapist in some way and is empathetic), negative experiences (e.g., restrictions worsened their mental health), and specific pathologies (e.g., used it for both anxiety and stress). In addition, the node representing ChatGPT as functioning well as a therapist was the most central node in the network Taken together, the current study indicates that, while users endorse several benefits from using ChatGPT for their mental health, they also report significant drawbacks, including restrictions by ChatGPT that can harm them or exacerbate their symptoms. Thus, ChatGPT may be a useful tool for persons not able to receive standard care, but it may not be as beneficial for persons with more severe pathologies or mental health concerns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"191 ","pages":"Pages 277-284"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ChatGPT as therapy: A qualitative and network-based thematic profiling of shared experiences, attitudes, and beliefs on Reddit\",\"authors\":\"Amanda C. Collins ,&nbsp;Damien Lekkas ,&nbsp;Michael V. Heinz ,&nbsp;Janelle Annor ,&nbsp;Franklin Ruan ,&nbsp;Nicholas C. Jacobson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.09.057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In recent years, large language models (LLMs), including ChatGPT, have exponentially grown in application. Given existing barriers to mental health services, alongside the capability of LLMs to generate therapeutic responses, LLMs have potential to serve as accessible precursors, adjuncts, or alternatives to traditional therapy. However, little is known about the opinions of persons who have used LLMs for mental health-related problems. Thus, the current work investigated the positive and negative experiences of those who have interacted with ChatGPT for their mental health using posts from relevant Reddit threads (<em>N</em> = 1594). A 33-item coding scheme was applied to code the presence/absence of each item, and coded posts were modeled using an Ising network graph to explore pairwise and groupwise thematic associations of items. Results from the qualitative coding indicated that the codes representing positive sentiment, experiencing affect/emotion, and attaining personal benefit from using ChatGPT for therapy were among the most frequently coded. Moreover, the Ising network model revealed the most important associations were between items representing positive experiences with ChatGPT (e.g., it performs better than a human therapist in some way and is empathetic), negative experiences (e.g., restrictions worsened their mental health), and specific pathologies (e.g., used it for both anxiety and stress). In addition, the node representing ChatGPT as functioning well as a therapist was the most central node in the network Taken together, the current study indicates that, while users endorse several benefits from using ChatGPT for their mental health, they also report significant drawbacks, including restrictions by ChatGPT that can harm them or exacerbate their symptoms. Thus, ChatGPT may be a useful tool for persons not able to receive standard care, but it may not be as beneficial for persons with more severe pathologies or mental health concerns.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 277-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625005801\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625005801","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,包括ChatGPT在内的大型语言模型(llm)的应用呈指数级增长。考虑到心理健康服务的现有障碍,以及法学硕士产生治疗反应的能力,法学硕士有可能作为传统疗法的可获得的前体、辅助或替代疗法。然而,对于使用法学硕士治疗心理健康问题的人的意见知之甚少。因此,目前的工作调查了那些与ChatGPT进行心理健康互动的人的积极和消极经历,使用相关Reddit线程的帖子(N = 1594)。采用33项编码方案对每个条目的存在/缺失进行编码,并使用Ising网络图对编码后的帖子进行建模,以探索条目的成对和分组主题关联。定性编码结果表明,代表积极情绪、体验情感/情感和通过使用ChatGPT进行治疗获得个人利益的编码频率最高。此外,伊辛网络模型显示,最重要的关联是在代表ChatGPT积极体验的项目之间(例如,它在某些方面比人类治疗师表现得更好,并且具有同理心),消极体验(例如,限制使他们的心理健康恶化)和特定病理(例如,将其用于焦虑和压力)。此外,代表ChatGPT作为治疗师功能良好的节点是网络中最中心的节点,综合来看,目前的研究表明,尽管用户认可使用ChatGPT对他们的心理健康有几个好处,但他们也报告了显著的缺点,包括ChatGPT可能伤害他们或加剧他们的症状的限制。因此,ChatGPT对于那些不能接受标准治疗的人来说可能是一个有用的工具,但对于那些有更严重的病理或精神健康问题的人来说可能不是很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ChatGPT as therapy: A qualitative and network-based thematic profiling of shared experiences, attitudes, and beliefs on Reddit
In recent years, large language models (LLMs), including ChatGPT, have exponentially grown in application. Given existing barriers to mental health services, alongside the capability of LLMs to generate therapeutic responses, LLMs have potential to serve as accessible precursors, adjuncts, or alternatives to traditional therapy. However, little is known about the opinions of persons who have used LLMs for mental health-related problems. Thus, the current work investigated the positive and negative experiences of those who have interacted with ChatGPT for their mental health using posts from relevant Reddit threads (N = 1594). A 33-item coding scheme was applied to code the presence/absence of each item, and coded posts were modeled using an Ising network graph to explore pairwise and groupwise thematic associations of items. Results from the qualitative coding indicated that the codes representing positive sentiment, experiencing affect/emotion, and attaining personal benefit from using ChatGPT for therapy were among the most frequently coded. Moreover, the Ising network model revealed the most important associations were between items representing positive experiences with ChatGPT (e.g., it performs better than a human therapist in some way and is empathetic), negative experiences (e.g., restrictions worsened their mental health), and specific pathologies (e.g., used it for both anxiety and stress). In addition, the node representing ChatGPT as functioning well as a therapist was the most central node in the network Taken together, the current study indicates that, while users endorse several benefits from using ChatGPT for their mental health, they also report significant drawbacks, including restrictions by ChatGPT that can harm them or exacerbate their symptoms. Thus, ChatGPT may be a useful tool for persons not able to receive standard care, but it may not be as beneficial for persons with more severe pathologies or mental health concerns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信