Igor Petrušić, Roberta Messina, Lanfranco Pellesi, David Garcia Azorin, Chia-Chun Chiang, Adriana Della Pietra, Woo-Seok Ha, Alejandro Labastida-Ramirez, Dilara Onan, Raffaele Ornello, Bianca Raffaelli, Eloisa Rubio-Beltran, Ruth Ruscheweyh, Claudio Tana, Doga Vuralli, Marta Waliszewska-Prosół, Wei Wang, William David Wells-Gatnik, Paolo Martelletti, Alberto Raggi
{"title":"机器学习在偏头痛分类中的应用:对研究设计标准化和全球合作的呼吁。","authors":"Igor Petrušić, Roberta Messina, Lanfranco Pellesi, David Garcia Azorin, Chia-Chun Chiang, Adriana Della Pietra, Woo-Seok Ha, Alejandro Labastida-Ramirez, Dilara Onan, Raffaele Ornello, Bianca Raffaelli, Eloisa Rubio-Beltran, Ruth Ruscheweyh, Claudio Tana, Doga Vuralli, Marta Waliszewska-Prosół, Wei Wang, William David Wells-Gatnik, Paolo Martelletti, Alberto Raggi","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-02134-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Migraine is a complex neurological disorder with diverse clinical phenotypes and a multifaceted pathophysiology, which poses substantial challenges for accurate diagnosis, subtype differentiation, and biomarker discovery. Machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as promising tools for classifying migraine patients and uncovering the underlying neurobiological mechanisms that differentiate migraine types and subtypes. This systematic review identifies current ML classification models for migraine types and subtypes, evaluating the quality, reproducibility, and clinical utility of published studies. The findings demonstrate that current ML models, particularly support vector machines and linear discriminant analysis, can accurately classify migraine patients based on structural and functional neuroimaging features with accuracies ranging from 75 to 98%. However, quality assessment revealed significant methodological heterogeneity across studies, including inconsistent reporting of model performance, insufficient patient phenotyping, small and imbalanced datasets, and limited external validation. These limitations hinder the global generalizability and reproducibility of these studies. We propose a roadmap for future research emphasizing well-characterized clinical subgrouping, standardized data acquisition and feature engineering protocols, transparency in model development and reporting, and collaborative multicentric designs to enable large-scale validation. Furthermore, this review stresses the importance of incorporating real-world phenotypic data, such as treatment response, comorbidities, and digital phenotyping metrics, to enrich ML models and support the transition toward precision medicine in migraine care. Ultimately, this review highlights the urgent need for methodological rigor in migraine ML classification studies to bridge the gap between experimental success and clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"200"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of machine learning in migraine classification: a call for study design standardization and global collaboration.\",\"authors\":\"Igor Petrušić, Roberta Messina, Lanfranco Pellesi, David Garcia Azorin, Chia-Chun Chiang, Adriana Della Pietra, Woo-Seok Ha, Alejandro Labastida-Ramirez, Dilara Onan, Raffaele Ornello, Bianca Raffaelli, Eloisa Rubio-Beltran, Ruth Ruscheweyh, Claudio Tana, Doga Vuralli, Marta Waliszewska-Prosół, Wei Wang, William David Wells-Gatnik, Paolo Martelletti, Alberto Raggi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10194-025-02134-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Migraine is a complex neurological disorder with diverse clinical phenotypes and a multifaceted pathophysiology, which poses substantial challenges for accurate diagnosis, subtype differentiation, and biomarker discovery. Machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as promising tools for classifying migraine patients and uncovering the underlying neurobiological mechanisms that differentiate migraine types and subtypes. This systematic review identifies current ML classification models for migraine types and subtypes, evaluating the quality, reproducibility, and clinical utility of published studies. The findings demonstrate that current ML models, particularly support vector machines and linear discriminant analysis, can accurately classify migraine patients based on structural and functional neuroimaging features with accuracies ranging from 75 to 98%. However, quality assessment revealed significant methodological heterogeneity across studies, including inconsistent reporting of model performance, insufficient patient phenotyping, small and imbalanced datasets, and limited external validation. These limitations hinder the global generalizability and reproducibility of these studies. We propose a roadmap for future research emphasizing well-characterized clinical subgrouping, standardized data acquisition and feature engineering protocols, transparency in model development and reporting, and collaborative multicentric designs to enable large-scale validation. Furthermore, this review stresses the importance of incorporating real-world phenotypic data, such as treatment response, comorbidities, and digital phenotyping metrics, to enrich ML models and support the transition toward precision medicine in migraine care. Ultimately, this review highlights the urgent need for methodological rigor in migraine ML classification studies to bridge the gap between experimental success and clinical applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492770/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02134-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02134-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Application of machine learning in migraine classification: a call for study design standardization and global collaboration.
Migraine is a complex neurological disorder with diverse clinical phenotypes and a multifaceted pathophysiology, which poses substantial challenges for accurate diagnosis, subtype differentiation, and biomarker discovery. Machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as promising tools for classifying migraine patients and uncovering the underlying neurobiological mechanisms that differentiate migraine types and subtypes. This systematic review identifies current ML classification models for migraine types and subtypes, evaluating the quality, reproducibility, and clinical utility of published studies. The findings demonstrate that current ML models, particularly support vector machines and linear discriminant analysis, can accurately classify migraine patients based on structural and functional neuroimaging features with accuracies ranging from 75 to 98%. However, quality assessment revealed significant methodological heterogeneity across studies, including inconsistent reporting of model performance, insufficient patient phenotyping, small and imbalanced datasets, and limited external validation. These limitations hinder the global generalizability and reproducibility of these studies. We propose a roadmap for future research emphasizing well-characterized clinical subgrouping, standardized data acquisition and feature engineering protocols, transparency in model development and reporting, and collaborative multicentric designs to enable large-scale validation. Furthermore, this review stresses the importance of incorporating real-world phenotypic data, such as treatment response, comorbidities, and digital phenotyping metrics, to enrich ML models and support the transition toward precision medicine in migraine care. Ultimately, this review highlights the urgent need for methodological rigor in migraine ML classification studies to bridge the gap between experimental success and clinical applicability.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data.
With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.