{"title":"脑年龄作为临床前认知能力下降的准确生物标志物:来自12年纵向研究的证据。","authors":"Odelia Elkana, Iman Beheshti","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13414-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive decline in older adults, particularly during the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD), presents a critical opportunity for early detection and intervention. While T1-weighted MRI is widely used in AD research, its capacity to identify early vulnerability and monitor longitudinal progression remains incompletely characterized. We analyzed longitudinal T1-weighted MRI data from 224 cognitively unimpaired older adults followed for up to 12 years. Participants were stratified by clinical outcome into converters to mild cognitive impairment (HC-converters, n = 112) and stable controls (HC-stable, n = 112). Groups were matched at baseline for age (mean ~ 74-75 years), education (~ 16.4 years), and cognitive scores (MMSE ≈ 29; CDR-SB ≈ 0.04). Four MRI-derived biomarkers were examined: brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD), mean cortical thickness, AD-cortical signature, and hippocampal volume. Brain-PAD showed the strongest baseline association with future conversion (β = 1.25, t = 3.52, p = 0.0009) and highest classification accuracy (AUC = 0.66; sensitivity = 62%, and specificity = 67%). Longitudinal mixed-effects models focusing on the group × time interaction revealed a significant positive slope in brain-PAD for converters (β = 0.0079, p = 0.003) and a non-significant trend in stable controls (β = 0.0047, p = 0.075), indicating incipient divergence in brain aging trajectories during the preclinical window. Hippocampal volume and AD-cortical signature declined similarly in both groups. The mean cortical thickness had limited discriminative or dynamic utility. These findings support brain-PAD, derived from routine T1-weighted MRI using machine learning, as a sensitive, performance-independent biomarker for early risk stratification and monitoring of cognitive aging trajectories.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 10","pages":"672"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain age as an accurate biomarker of preclinical cognitive decline: evidence from a 12-year longitudinal study.\",\"authors\":\"Odelia Elkana, Iman Beheshti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-025-13414-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cognitive decline in older adults, particularly during the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD), presents a critical opportunity for early detection and intervention. While T1-weighted MRI is widely used in AD research, its capacity to identify early vulnerability and monitor longitudinal progression remains incompletely characterized. We analyzed longitudinal T1-weighted MRI data from 224 cognitively unimpaired older adults followed for up to 12 years. Participants were stratified by clinical outcome into converters to mild cognitive impairment (HC-converters, n = 112) and stable controls (HC-stable, n = 112). Groups were matched at baseline for age (mean ~ 74-75 years), education (~ 16.4 years), and cognitive scores (MMSE ≈ 29; CDR-SB ≈ 0.04). Four MRI-derived biomarkers were examined: brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD), mean cortical thickness, AD-cortical signature, and hippocampal volume. Brain-PAD showed the strongest baseline association with future conversion (β = 1.25, t = 3.52, p = 0.0009) and highest classification accuracy (AUC = 0.66; sensitivity = 62%, and specificity = 67%). Longitudinal mixed-effects models focusing on the group × time interaction revealed a significant positive slope in brain-PAD for converters (β = 0.0079, p = 0.003) and a non-significant trend in stable controls (β = 0.0047, p = 0.075), indicating incipient divergence in brain aging trajectories during the preclinical window. Hippocampal volume and AD-cortical signature declined similarly in both groups. The mean cortical thickness had limited discriminative or dynamic utility. These findings support brain-PAD, derived from routine T1-weighted MRI using machine learning, as a sensitive, performance-independent biomarker for early risk stratification and monitoring of cognitive aging trajectories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 10\",\"pages\":\"672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13414-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13414-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
老年人的认知能力下降,特别是在阿尔茨海默病(AD)的临床前阶段,为早期发现和干预提供了一个关键的机会。虽然t1加权MRI广泛用于阿尔茨海默病研究,但其识别早期易感性和监测纵向进展的能力仍不完全明确。我们分析了224名认知功能正常的老年人长达12年的纵向t1加权MRI数据。根据临床结果将参与者分为轻度认知障碍转换者(hc -转换者,n = 112)和稳定对照组(hc -稳定者,n = 112)。各组在基线年龄(平均~ 74 ~ 75岁)、受教育程度(~ 16.4年)和认知评分(MMSE≈29;CDR-SB≈0.04)进行匹配。研究人员检测了四种mri衍生的生物标志物:脑预测年龄差异(脑- pad)、平均皮质厚度、ad -皮质特征和海马体积。脑- pad与未来转归的基线相关性最强(β = 1.25, t = 3.52, p = 0.0009),分类准确率最高(AUC = 0.66,敏感性= 62%,特异性= 67%)。关注组与时间相互作用的纵向混合效应模型显示,转换者的脑- pad呈显著正斜率(β = 0.0079, p = 0.003),而稳定对照组的趋势不显著(β = 0.0047, p = 0.075),表明在临床前窗口期,大脑衰老轨迹开始出现分化。两组海马体积和ad -皮质特征下降相似。平均皮质厚度具有有限的判别或动态效用。这些发现支持脑外pad作为一种敏感的、性能独立的生物标志物,用于早期风险分层和监测认知衰老轨迹。
Brain age as an accurate biomarker of preclinical cognitive decline: evidence from a 12-year longitudinal study.
Cognitive decline in older adults, particularly during the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD), presents a critical opportunity for early detection and intervention. While T1-weighted MRI is widely used in AD research, its capacity to identify early vulnerability and monitor longitudinal progression remains incompletely characterized. We analyzed longitudinal T1-weighted MRI data from 224 cognitively unimpaired older adults followed for up to 12 years. Participants were stratified by clinical outcome into converters to mild cognitive impairment (HC-converters, n = 112) and stable controls (HC-stable, n = 112). Groups were matched at baseline for age (mean ~ 74-75 years), education (~ 16.4 years), and cognitive scores (MMSE ≈ 29; CDR-SB ≈ 0.04). Four MRI-derived biomarkers were examined: brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD), mean cortical thickness, AD-cortical signature, and hippocampal volume. Brain-PAD showed the strongest baseline association with future conversion (β = 1.25, t = 3.52, p = 0.0009) and highest classification accuracy (AUC = 0.66; sensitivity = 62%, and specificity = 67%). Longitudinal mixed-effects models focusing on the group × time interaction revealed a significant positive slope in brain-PAD for converters (β = 0.0079, p = 0.003) and a non-significant trend in stable controls (β = 0.0047, p = 0.075), indicating incipient divergence in brain aging trajectories during the preclinical window. Hippocampal volume and AD-cortical signature declined similarly in both groups. The mean cortical thickness had limited discriminative or dynamic utility. These findings support brain-PAD, derived from routine T1-weighted MRI using machine learning, as a sensitive, performance-independent biomarker for early risk stratification and monitoring of cognitive aging trajectories.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.