{"title":"贝伐单抗生物仿制药(Stivant®)与参考产品(Avastin®)治疗早产儿阈前I型视网膜病变的疗效和安全性比较","authors":"Mojtaba Abrishami, Zohreh Golmohammadi, Nasser Shoeibi, Mohammad-Reza Ansari-Astaneh, Mehdi Sakhayi, Majid Abrishami, Seyedeh Maryam Hosseini, Elham Bakhtiari, Mehrdad Motamed Shariati","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_178_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of Stivant<sup>®</sup> (biosimilar bevacizumab, CinnaGen, Iran) to Avastin<sup>®</sup> (innovator bevacizumab, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) in premature infants with prethreshold type I retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preterm infants with bilateral prethreshold type 1 ROP were enrolled in this nonrandomized contralateral clinical trial. Bilateral intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) was administered, with Stivant<sup>®</sup> injected in one eye and Avastin<sup>®</sup> in the other. Patients were followed up weekly for 4 weeks, then biweekly until complete retinal vascularization. Efficacy was evaluated based on disease activity regression (plus disease regression) and complete retinal vascularization. Safety was assessed through the monitoring of adverse events such as uveitis and endophthalmitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four infants were included in the study. The mean age at IVB injection was 34.5 weeks. Complete retinal vascularization occurred at a mean age of 60.02 weeks for Stivant<sup>®</sup> and 59.93 weeks for Avastin<sup>®</sup> (<i>P</i> = 0.59). Five patients (11.3%) underwent bilateral laser photocoagulation as rescue treatment. Our results showed that Stivant<sup>®</sup> was noninferior to Avastin<sup>®</sup> in retinal vascularization progress. However, this study cannot make definitive noninferiority claims due to the sample size and its design as a pilot investigation. No cases of endophthalmitis or uveitis were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stivant<sup>®</sup> exhibited noninferiority to Avastin<sup>®</sup> in efficacy and demonstrated a comparable safety profile in treating prethreshold type I ROP. A definite conclusion requires more extended studies with a larger sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":"36 4","pages":"407-412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Bevacizumab (Stivant<sup>®</sup>) versus Reference Product (Avastin<sup>®</sup>) in Prethreshold Type I Retinopathy of Prematurity.\",\"authors\":\"Mojtaba Abrishami, Zohreh Golmohammadi, Nasser Shoeibi, Mohammad-Reza Ansari-Astaneh, Mehdi Sakhayi, Majid Abrishami, Seyedeh Maryam Hosseini, Elham Bakhtiari, Mehrdad Motamed Shariati\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joco.joco_178_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of Stivant<sup>®</sup> (biosimilar bevacizumab, CinnaGen, Iran) to Avastin<sup>®</sup> (innovator bevacizumab, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) in premature infants with prethreshold type I retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preterm infants with bilateral prethreshold type 1 ROP were enrolled in this nonrandomized contralateral clinical trial. Bilateral intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) was administered, with Stivant<sup>®</sup> injected in one eye and Avastin<sup>®</sup> in the other. Patients were followed up weekly for 4 weeks, then biweekly until complete retinal vascularization. Efficacy was evaluated based on disease activity regression (plus disease regression) and complete retinal vascularization. Safety was assessed through the monitoring of adverse events such as uveitis and endophthalmitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four infants were included in the study. The mean age at IVB injection was 34.5 weeks. Complete retinal vascularization occurred at a mean age of 60.02 weeks for Stivant<sup>®</sup> and 59.93 weeks for Avastin<sup>®</sup> (<i>P</i> = 0.59). Five patients (11.3%) underwent bilateral laser photocoagulation as rescue treatment. Our results showed that Stivant<sup>®</sup> was noninferior to Avastin<sup>®</sup> in retinal vascularization progress. However, this study cannot make definitive noninferiority claims due to the sample size and its design as a pilot investigation. No cases of endophthalmitis or uveitis were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stivant<sup>®</sup> exhibited noninferiority to Avastin<sup>®</sup> in efficacy and demonstrated a comparable safety profile in treating prethreshold type I ROP. A definite conclusion requires more extended studies with a larger sample size.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"407-412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487802/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_178_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_178_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较Stivant®(生物仿制药贝伐单抗,CinnaGen,伊朗)和Avastin®(创新贝伐单抗,Genentech, South San Francisco, CA)在早产儿阈前I型早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)中的疗效和安全性。方法:双侧阈前1型ROP早产儿被纳入这项非随机对侧临床试验。给予双侧玻璃体内贝伐单抗(IVB),一只眼睛注射Stivant®,另一只眼睛注射Avastin®。患者每周随访4周,然后每两周随访一次,直到视网膜血管完全形成。疗效评估基于疾病活动性消退(加上疾病消退)和完全视网膜血管化。通过监测诸如葡萄膜炎和眼内炎等不良事件来评估安全性。结果:44名婴儿被纳入研究。静脉注射时的平均年龄为34.5周。Stivant的平均年龄为60.02周,Avastin的平均年龄为59.93周(P = 0.59)。5例(11.3%)患者行双侧激光光凝抢救治疗。我们的结果显示,Stivant®在视网膜血管化进展方面不逊于Avastin®。然而,由于样本量和作为试点调查的设计,本研究不能做出明确的非劣效性声明。无眼内炎或葡萄膜炎病例报告。结论:Stivant®在疗效上与Avastin®具有非劣效性,并且在治疗阈前I型ROP方面具有相当的安全性。一个明确的结论需要更广泛的研究和更大的样本量。
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Bevacizumab (Stivant®) versus Reference Product (Avastin®) in Prethreshold Type I Retinopathy of Prematurity.
Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of Stivant® (biosimilar bevacizumab, CinnaGen, Iran) to Avastin® (innovator bevacizumab, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) in premature infants with prethreshold type I retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
Methods: Preterm infants with bilateral prethreshold type 1 ROP were enrolled in this nonrandomized contralateral clinical trial. Bilateral intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) was administered, with Stivant® injected in one eye and Avastin® in the other. Patients were followed up weekly for 4 weeks, then biweekly until complete retinal vascularization. Efficacy was evaluated based on disease activity regression (plus disease regression) and complete retinal vascularization. Safety was assessed through the monitoring of adverse events such as uveitis and endophthalmitis.
Results: Forty-four infants were included in the study. The mean age at IVB injection was 34.5 weeks. Complete retinal vascularization occurred at a mean age of 60.02 weeks for Stivant® and 59.93 weeks for Avastin® (P = 0.59). Five patients (11.3%) underwent bilateral laser photocoagulation as rescue treatment. Our results showed that Stivant® was noninferior to Avastin® in retinal vascularization progress. However, this study cannot make definitive noninferiority claims due to the sample size and its design as a pilot investigation. No cases of endophthalmitis or uveitis were reported.
Conclusions: Stivant® exhibited noninferiority to Avastin® in efficacy and demonstrated a comparable safety profile in treating prethreshold type I ROP. A definite conclusion requires more extended studies with a larger sample size.
期刊介绍:
Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.