2020年重症监护病房治疗COVID-19、流感和呼吸道败血症后的长期结果——一项基于人群的比较队列研究

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Franka E A Joost, Norman Rose, Aurelia Kimmig, Thomas Ruhnke, Patrik Dröge, Antje Freytag, Christian Günster, Mathias W Pletz, Martin Roesler, Philipp A Reuken, Peter Schlattmann, Konrad F R Schmidt, Andreas Stallmach, Josephine Storch, Konrad Reinhart, Lisa Wedekind, Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek
{"title":"2020年重症监护病房治疗COVID-19、流感和呼吸道败血症后的长期结果——一项基于人群的比较队列研究","authors":"Franka E A Joost, Norman Rose, Aurelia Kimmig, Thomas Ruhnke, Patrik Dröge, Antje Freytag, Christian Günster, Mathias W Pletz, Martin Roesler, Philipp A Reuken, Peter Schlattmann, Konrad F R Schmidt, Andreas Stallmach, Josephine Storch, Konrad Reinhart, Lisa Wedekind, Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek","doi":"10.1007/s15010-025-02644-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis survivors are affected by a broad spectrum of long-term impairments, which overlap with Long-Covid and sequelae after influenza in their clinical presentation. However, we lack comparative assessments on the burden of long-term outcomes, particularly with patients being recruited from the same, contemporary patient population. Therefore we compared long-term outcomes after respiratory sepsis (RS), SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis (SS) and influenza-associated sepsis (IS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, population-based cohort study. We included patients > 15 years hospitalized with RS, SS and IS between 01/2020 and 12/2020 in Germany, who received intensive care unit treatment. We compared mortality, readmissions, prevalence of diagnoses in the cognitive, psychological or medical domain, and the number of impaired domains in the 12 months post-discharge between the three survivor cohorts, adjusting for between-group differences in relevant covariates by inverse propensity score weighting based on generalized propensity scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 12,854 patients, of which 8,201 were RS, 3,964 SS and 689 IS survivors. RS survivors had a considerably higher risk for 12-month mortality compared to SS and IS survivors (relative risk, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.54-2.03]; P < 0.001 and relative risk, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.14-1.65]; P = 0.001, respectively). They were more often rehospitalized, affected by multiple domain impairments, cognitive decline and impairments related to the severity of acute disease, e.g. complications of the tracheostoma, compared to survivors after SS and IS. RS survivors had a lower risk for being affected by medical diagnoses compared to SS. Risks for psychological diagnoses did not differ between RS and the other survivor groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although respiratory sepsis survivors seem to be affected by more severe long-term impairments, the overall burden of post-acute sequelae among all survivor groups is high. This warrants efforts to provide targeted aftercare for all survivor populations after life-threatening infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term outcomes after intensive care unit-treated COVID-19, influenza and respiratory sepsis in 2020 - a comparative, population-based cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Franka E A Joost, Norman Rose, Aurelia Kimmig, Thomas Ruhnke, Patrik Dröge, Antje Freytag, Christian Günster, Mathias W Pletz, Martin Roesler, Philipp A Reuken, Peter Schlattmann, Konrad F R Schmidt, Andreas Stallmach, Josephine Storch, Konrad Reinhart, Lisa Wedekind, Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s15010-025-02644-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis survivors are affected by a broad spectrum of long-term impairments, which overlap with Long-Covid and sequelae after influenza in their clinical presentation. However, we lack comparative assessments on the burden of long-term outcomes, particularly with patients being recruited from the same, contemporary patient population. Therefore we compared long-term outcomes after respiratory sepsis (RS), SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis (SS) and influenza-associated sepsis (IS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, population-based cohort study. We included patients > 15 years hospitalized with RS, SS and IS between 01/2020 and 12/2020 in Germany, who received intensive care unit treatment. We compared mortality, readmissions, prevalence of diagnoses in the cognitive, psychological or medical domain, and the number of impaired domains in the 12 months post-discharge between the three survivor cohorts, adjusting for between-group differences in relevant covariates by inverse propensity score weighting based on generalized propensity scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 12,854 patients, of which 8,201 were RS, 3,964 SS and 689 IS survivors. RS survivors had a considerably higher risk for 12-month mortality compared to SS and IS survivors (relative risk, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.54-2.03]; P < 0.001 and relative risk, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.14-1.65]; P = 0.001, respectively). They were more often rehospitalized, affected by multiple domain impairments, cognitive decline and impairments related to the severity of acute disease, e.g. complications of the tracheostoma, compared to survivors after SS and IS. RS survivors had a lower risk for being affected by medical diagnoses compared to SS. Risks for psychological diagnoses did not differ between RS and the other survivor groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although respiratory sepsis survivors seem to be affected by more severe long-term impairments, the overall burden of post-acute sequelae among all survivor groups is high. This warrants efforts to provide targeted aftercare for all survivor populations after life-threatening infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02644-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02644-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脓毒症幸存者受到广泛的长期损伤的影响,其临床表现与流感后的长covid和后遗症重叠。然而,我们缺乏对长期结果负担的比较评估,特别是从相同的当代患者人群中招募的患者。因此,我们比较了呼吸道败血症(RS)、sars - cov -2相关败血症(SS)和流感相关败血症(IS)后的长期结局。方法:回顾性、基于人群的队列研究。我们纳入了2020年1月1日至2020年12月期间在德国因RS、SS和IS住院15年的患者,这些患者接受了重症监护病房治疗。我们比较了三个幸存者队列在出院后12个月内的死亡率、再入院率、认知、心理或医学领域诊断的患病率以及受损领域的数量,并通过基于广义倾向评分的逆倾向评分加权来调整相关共变量的组间差异。结果:我们的研究纳入了12,854例患者,其中8,201例RS, 3,964例SS和689例IS幸存者。与SS和IS患者相比,RS患者的12个月死亡率明显更高(相对危险度为1.77 [95% CI, 1.54-2.03]; P结论:尽管呼吸道败血症患者似乎受到更严重的长期损伤的影响,但所有患者组急性后后遗症的总体负担都很高。因此,有必要努力为危及生命的感染后的所有幸存者提供有针对性的善后护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term outcomes after intensive care unit-treated COVID-19, influenza and respiratory sepsis in 2020 - a comparative, population-based cohort study.

Background: Sepsis survivors are affected by a broad spectrum of long-term impairments, which overlap with Long-Covid and sequelae after influenza in their clinical presentation. However, we lack comparative assessments on the burden of long-term outcomes, particularly with patients being recruited from the same, contemporary patient population. Therefore we compared long-term outcomes after respiratory sepsis (RS), SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis (SS) and influenza-associated sepsis (IS).

Methods: Retrospective, population-based cohort study. We included patients > 15 years hospitalized with RS, SS and IS between 01/2020 and 12/2020 in Germany, who received intensive care unit treatment. We compared mortality, readmissions, prevalence of diagnoses in the cognitive, psychological or medical domain, and the number of impaired domains in the 12 months post-discharge between the three survivor cohorts, adjusting for between-group differences in relevant covariates by inverse propensity score weighting based on generalized propensity scores.

Results: Our study included 12,854 patients, of which 8,201 were RS, 3,964 SS and 689 IS survivors. RS survivors had a considerably higher risk for 12-month mortality compared to SS and IS survivors (relative risk, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.54-2.03]; P < 0.001 and relative risk, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.14-1.65]; P = 0.001, respectively). They were more often rehospitalized, affected by multiple domain impairments, cognitive decline and impairments related to the severity of acute disease, e.g. complications of the tracheostoma, compared to survivors after SS and IS. RS survivors had a lower risk for being affected by medical diagnoses compared to SS. Risks for psychological diagnoses did not differ between RS and the other survivor groups.

Conclusions: Although respiratory sepsis survivors seem to be affected by more severe long-term impairments, the overall burden of post-acute sequelae among all survivor groups is high. This warrants efforts to provide targeted aftercare for all survivor populations after life-threatening infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信