大学生重性抑郁症状与情绪表达矛盾心理的相互关系:性别差异的网络视角

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-09-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1658159
Xiangxiang Chen
{"title":"大学生重性抑郁症状与情绪表达矛盾心理的相互关系:性别差异的网络视角","authors":"Xiangxiang Chen","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1658159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Major depressive disorder is a common and severe mental disorder among college students. Meanwhile, depressive symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression are closely related, while little research explores their bidirectional relationship. To address this gap, the current study employed a network approach to identify the interrelation between depressive symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression among college students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initially, 2,103 college students were recruited and completed the patient health questionnaire (PHQ) -9 and the ambivalence over emotional expression questionnaire (AEQ). In the final analysis, 1,362 college students passed the attention check and were included (674 females; age: <i>Mean</i> = 18.61, <i>SD</i> = 0.84). The symptom network approach was employed to explore the interrelation between depressive symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression, as well as to explore the gender difference between symptom networks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest edges between depression and ambivalence over emotional expression were observed between \"concentration difficulties\" (PHQ7) and \"emotional rumination\" (AEQ1), as well as between \"guilt\" (PHQ6) and \"regret expressing\" (AEQ5) in the overall sample. The edge between \"inhibit positive emotion expression\" (AEQ3) and \"inhibit negative emotion expression\" (AEQ4) was the strongest edge weight in male and female networks. For bridging symptoms, \"concentration difficulties\" (PHQ7), \"emotional rumination\" (AEQ1), \"guilt\" (PHQ6), and \"regret expressing\" (AEQ5) were the biggest bridging symptoms (<i>Z</i> score above 1) that linked depression symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression. Between gender networks, \"guilt\" (PHQ6) was the common and strongest bridging symptom (<i>Z</i> score above 1) in both male and female networks. Network robustness and stability were also estimated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study provides a new perspective on the interrelation between depressive symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression, as well as examines the gender difference. In light of the findings, further intervention, such as cognitive control training or mindfulness-based interventions that focus on bridging symptoms, may disassociate the interrelation between depression and ambivalence over emotional expression.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"16 ","pages":"1658159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The interrelation between major depressive symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression among college students: a network perspective on gender differences.\",\"authors\":\"Xiangxiang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1658159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Major depressive disorder is a common and severe mental disorder among college students. Meanwhile, depressive symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression are closely related, while little research explores their bidirectional relationship. To address this gap, the current study employed a network approach to identify the interrelation between depressive symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression among college students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initially, 2,103 college students were recruited and completed the patient health questionnaire (PHQ) -9 and the ambivalence over emotional expression questionnaire (AEQ). In the final analysis, 1,362 college students passed the attention check and were included (674 females; age: <i>Mean</i> = 18.61, <i>SD</i> = 0.84). The symptom network approach was employed to explore the interrelation between depressive symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression, as well as to explore the gender difference between symptom networks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest edges between depression and ambivalence over emotional expression were observed between \\\"concentration difficulties\\\" (PHQ7) and \\\"emotional rumination\\\" (AEQ1), as well as between \\\"guilt\\\" (PHQ6) and \\\"regret expressing\\\" (AEQ5) in the overall sample. The edge between \\\"inhibit positive emotion expression\\\" (AEQ3) and \\\"inhibit negative emotion expression\\\" (AEQ4) was the strongest edge weight in male and female networks. For bridging symptoms, \\\"concentration difficulties\\\" (PHQ7), \\\"emotional rumination\\\" (AEQ1), \\\"guilt\\\" (PHQ6), and \\\"regret expressing\\\" (AEQ5) were the biggest bridging symptoms (<i>Z</i> score above 1) that linked depression symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression. Between gender networks, \\\"guilt\\\" (PHQ6) was the common and strongest bridging symptom (<i>Z</i> score above 1) in both male and female networks. Network robustness and stability were also estimated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study provides a new perspective on the interrelation between depressive symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression, as well as examines the gender difference. In light of the findings, further intervention, such as cognitive control training or mindfulness-based interventions that focus on bridging symptoms, may disassociate the interrelation between depression and ambivalence over emotional expression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1658159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484036/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1658159\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1658159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重度抑郁症是大学生中常见的严重的精神障碍。同时,抑郁症状与情绪表达的矛盾心理密切相关,但对其双向关系的研究较少。为了解决这一差距,本研究采用网络方法来确定大学生抑郁症状与情绪表达矛盾心理之间的相互关系。方法:先招募2103名大学生,填写患者健康问卷(PHQ) -9和情绪表达矛盾心理问卷(AEQ)。最终通过注意力检查的1362名大学生被纳入研究,其中女性674名,年龄:Mean = 18.61, SD = 0.84。采用症状网络方法探讨抑郁症状与情绪表达矛盾心理的相互关系,并探讨症状网络的性别差异。结果:在整体样本中,“注意力集中困难”(PHQ7)与“情绪反思性”(AEQ1)、“内疚”(PHQ6)与“后悔表达”(AEQ5)之间的抑郁与矛盾情绪表达之间的边界最为明显。“抑制积极情绪表达”(AEQ3)和“抑制消极情绪表达”(AEQ4)之间的边权是男女网络中最强的边权权重。在桥接症状方面,“注意力集中困难”(PHQ7)、“情绪反刍”(AEQ1)、“内疚”(PHQ6)和“后悔表达”(AEQ5)是将抑郁症状与情绪表达矛盾心理联系起来的最大桥接症状(Z分大于1)。在性别网络之间,“内疚”(PHQ6)是男性和女性网络中最常见和最强的桥接症状(Z分大于1)。同时对网络的鲁棒性和稳定性进行了估计。结论:本研究为抑郁症状与情绪表达矛盾心理的相互关系提供了新的视角,并探讨了性别差异。根据研究结果,进一步的干预,如认知控制训练或专注于桥接症状的基于正念的干预,可能会将抑郁与情绪表达的矛盾心理之间的相互关系分离开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The interrelation between major depressive symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression among college students: a network perspective on gender differences.

Introduction: Major depressive disorder is a common and severe mental disorder among college students. Meanwhile, depressive symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression are closely related, while little research explores their bidirectional relationship. To address this gap, the current study employed a network approach to identify the interrelation between depressive symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression among college students.

Methods: Initially, 2,103 college students were recruited and completed the patient health questionnaire (PHQ) -9 and the ambivalence over emotional expression questionnaire (AEQ). In the final analysis, 1,362 college students passed the attention check and were included (674 females; age: Mean = 18.61, SD = 0.84). The symptom network approach was employed to explore the interrelation between depressive symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression, as well as to explore the gender difference between symptom networks.

Results: The strongest edges between depression and ambivalence over emotional expression were observed between "concentration difficulties" (PHQ7) and "emotional rumination" (AEQ1), as well as between "guilt" (PHQ6) and "regret expressing" (AEQ5) in the overall sample. The edge between "inhibit positive emotion expression" (AEQ3) and "inhibit negative emotion expression" (AEQ4) was the strongest edge weight in male and female networks. For bridging symptoms, "concentration difficulties" (PHQ7), "emotional rumination" (AEQ1), "guilt" (PHQ6), and "regret expressing" (AEQ5) were the biggest bridging symptoms (Z score above 1) that linked depression symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression. Between gender networks, "guilt" (PHQ6) was the common and strongest bridging symptom (Z score above 1) in both male and female networks. Network robustness and stability were also estimated.

Conclusion: The current study provides a new perspective on the interrelation between depressive symptoms and ambivalence over emotional expression, as well as examines the gender difference. In light of the findings, further intervention, such as cognitive control training or mindfulness-based interventions that focus on bridging symptoms, may disassociate the interrelation between depression and ambivalence over emotional expression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信