眼动脱敏和再加工对物质使用障碍的治疗效果:成瘾相关症状和情绪症状的荟萃分析

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-09-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1660046
Ji-Woo Seok, Kahye Kim, Jaeuk U Kim
{"title":"眼动脱敏和再加工对物质使用障碍的治疗效果:成瘾相关症状和情绪症状的荟萃分析","authors":"Ji-Woo Seok, Kahye Kim, Jaeuk U Kim","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1660046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis identified the effects of EMDR on both addiction-related symptoms (e.g., craving, addiction severity) and comorbid emotional symptoms (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety), and the influence of moderator variables across these symptom domains in substance use disorders (SUDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched the literature published up to June 2025 through major databases including Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO. A total of 14 studies were included in the final analysis, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), randomized crossover studies, and quasi-experimental studies. The effect size was calculated using Hedges' g based on pre-to-post treatment changes, and a meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. In addition, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed, focusing on moderator variables such as study design, intervention type, total session number, and participant characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis results showed that EMDR produced a significant treatment effect with moderate or higher effect sizes for craving (g = 0.55), PTSD (g = 0.69), depression (g = 0.64), and anxiety (g = 0.72) symptoms, and heterogeneity ranged from low to moderate. On the other hand, the effect on addiction severity was not significant (g = 0.14). The effect on craving showed significant differences depending on the diagnostic group of the participants (Alcohol/Drug Use Group vs. Nicotine Use Group) and the study design (RCT vs. non-RCT). Some studies observed a short-term effect of reducing craving, but the evidence supporting long-term treatment effects was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that EMDR may be an effective intervention not only for emotional comorbid symptoms in individuals with SUD, but also for certain addiction-related symptoms, particularly in reducing craving. However, the quality of the included studies was generally low, and there was a lack of evidence regarding long-term effects. Future studies should employ more rigorous research designs, include sufficient sample sizes and long-term follow-up assessments, and perform detailed analyses that take into account intervention types and participant characteristics. Such research will help to clarify the therapeutic utility of EMDR and promote its practical application in addiction treatment settings.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251070837, identifier CRD420251070837.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"16 ","pages":"1660046"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic effects of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for substance use disorders: a meta-analysis of addiction-related and emotional symptoms.\",\"authors\":\"Ji-Woo Seok, Kahye Kim, Jaeuk U Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1660046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis identified the effects of EMDR on both addiction-related symptoms (e.g., craving, addiction severity) and comorbid emotional symptoms (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety), and the influence of moderator variables across these symptom domains in substance use disorders (SUDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched the literature published up to June 2025 through major databases including Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO. A total of 14 studies were included in the final analysis, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), randomized crossover studies, and quasi-experimental studies. The effect size was calculated using Hedges' g based on pre-to-post treatment changes, and a meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. In addition, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed, focusing on moderator variables such as study design, intervention type, total session number, and participant characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis results showed that EMDR produced a significant treatment effect with moderate or higher effect sizes for craving (g = 0.55), PTSD (g = 0.69), depression (g = 0.64), and anxiety (g = 0.72) symptoms, and heterogeneity ranged from low to moderate. On the other hand, the effect on addiction severity was not significant (g = 0.14). The effect on craving showed significant differences depending on the diagnostic group of the participants (Alcohol/Drug Use Group vs. Nicotine Use Group) and the study design (RCT vs. non-RCT). Some studies observed a short-term effect of reducing craving, but the evidence supporting long-term treatment effects was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that EMDR may be an effective intervention not only for emotional comorbid symptoms in individuals with SUD, but also for certain addiction-related symptoms, particularly in reducing craving. However, the quality of the included studies was generally low, and there was a lack of evidence regarding long-term effects. Future studies should employ more rigorous research designs, include sufficient sample sizes and long-term follow-up assessments, and perform detailed analyses that take into account intervention types and participant characteristics. Such research will help to clarify the therapeutic utility of EMDR and promote its practical application in addiction treatment settings.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251070837, identifier CRD420251070837.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1660046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484161/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1660046\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1660046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本荟萃分析确定了EMDR对成瘾相关症状(如渴望、成瘾严重程度)和共病情绪症状(如创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、抑郁、焦虑)的影响,以及物质使用障碍(sud)中这些症状域的调节变量的影响。方法:通过Cochrane、PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO等主要数据库系统检索截至2025年6月发表的文献。最终分析共纳入14项研究,包括随机对照试验(rct)、随机交叉研究和准实验研究。效应量采用基于治疗前后变化的Hedges’g计算,并采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。此外,还进行了元回归和亚组分析,重点关注研究设计、干预类型、总会话数和参与者特征等调节变量。结果:荟萃分析结果显示,EMDR对渴望(g = 0.55)、创伤后应激障碍(g = 0.69)、抑郁(g = 0.64)和焦虑(g = 0.72)症状具有中等或更高的效果,且异质性从低到中不等。另一方面,对成瘾严重程度的影响不显著(g = 0.14)。对渴望的影响根据参与者的诊断组(酒精/药物使用组vs尼古丁使用组)和研究设计(随机对照试验vs非随机对照试验)显示出显著差异。一些研究观察到减少渴望的短期效果,但支持长期治疗效果的证据有限。结论:这些发现表明,EMDR可能不仅对SUD患者的情绪共病症状有效,而且对某些成瘾相关症状也有效,特别是在减少渴望方面。然而,纳入研究的质量普遍较低,并且缺乏关于长期影响的证据。未来的研究应采用更严格的研究设计,包括足够的样本量和长期随访评估,并进行考虑干预类型和参与者特征的详细分析。这样的研究将有助于阐明EMDR的治疗效用,并促进其在成瘾治疗环境中的实际应用。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251070837,标识符CRD420251070837。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Therapeutic effects of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for substance use disorders: a meta-analysis of addiction-related and emotional symptoms.

Therapeutic effects of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for substance use disorders: a meta-analysis of addiction-related and emotional symptoms.

Therapeutic effects of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for substance use disorders: a meta-analysis of addiction-related and emotional symptoms.

Therapeutic effects of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for substance use disorders: a meta-analysis of addiction-related and emotional symptoms.

Objective: This meta-analysis identified the effects of EMDR on both addiction-related symptoms (e.g., craving, addiction severity) and comorbid emotional symptoms (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety), and the influence of moderator variables across these symptom domains in substance use disorders (SUDs).

Methods: We systematically searched the literature published up to June 2025 through major databases including Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO. A total of 14 studies were included in the final analysis, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), randomized crossover studies, and quasi-experimental studies. The effect size was calculated using Hedges' g based on pre-to-post treatment changes, and a meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. In addition, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed, focusing on moderator variables such as study design, intervention type, total session number, and participant characteristics.

Results: The meta-analysis results showed that EMDR produced a significant treatment effect with moderate or higher effect sizes for craving (g = 0.55), PTSD (g = 0.69), depression (g = 0.64), and anxiety (g = 0.72) symptoms, and heterogeneity ranged from low to moderate. On the other hand, the effect on addiction severity was not significant (g = 0.14). The effect on craving showed significant differences depending on the diagnostic group of the participants (Alcohol/Drug Use Group vs. Nicotine Use Group) and the study design (RCT vs. non-RCT). Some studies observed a short-term effect of reducing craving, but the evidence supporting long-term treatment effects was limited.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that EMDR may be an effective intervention not only for emotional comorbid symptoms in individuals with SUD, but also for certain addiction-related symptoms, particularly in reducing craving. However, the quality of the included studies was generally low, and there was a lack of evidence regarding long-term effects. Future studies should employ more rigorous research designs, include sufficient sample sizes and long-term follow-up assessments, and perform detailed analyses that take into account intervention types and participant characteristics. Such research will help to clarify the therapeutic utility of EMDR and promote its practical application in addiction treatment settings.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251070837, identifier CRD420251070837.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信