Alia Alawneh, Sakhr Alshwayyat, Ayman Shatnawi, Abdalwahab Alenezy, Karam Maraqa
{"title":"迈向全面的姑息治疗培训:解决医学教育中的性别和培训阶段差异。","authors":"Alia Alawneh, Sakhr Alshwayyat, Ayman Shatnawi, Abdalwahab Alenezy, Karam Maraqa","doi":"10.1080/20565623.2025.2553474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care (PC) education is globally recommended; however, many regions lack sufficient training. This study aimed to evaluate medical students' confidence in PC and pain management and to compare confidence levels according to year of training and both male and female genders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study was conducted at a medical school in northern Jordan. A convenience sample of medical students were asked to fill a survey comprising the Self-Efficacy in Palliative Care Scale (SEPC) and Thanatophobia Scale (TS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 289 students were enrolled in this study. In their first year of clinical training, 137 were female and 130 were students. In the SEPC, discussing the patient's death with the patient was the domain in which the students were least confident. Confidence in working on a multi-professional PC team was recognized as the highest skill area among the participants. Confidence in students' ability to assess patients' pain needs was identified as the most confident skill, whereas their ability to prescribe appropriate pain control medications was the lowest. There was a significant difference in TS between the female and male medical students.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An integrated pain and PC curriculum in medical schools is essential to help students achieve confidence in pain management and palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12568,"journal":{"name":"Future Science OA","volume":"11 1","pages":"2553474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12498538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward comprehensive palliative care training: addressing gender and training stage differences in medical education.\",\"authors\":\"Alia Alawneh, Sakhr Alshwayyat, Ayman Shatnawi, Abdalwahab Alenezy, Karam Maraqa\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20565623.2025.2553474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care (PC) education is globally recommended; however, many regions lack sufficient training. This study aimed to evaluate medical students' confidence in PC and pain management and to compare confidence levels according to year of training and both male and female genders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study was conducted at a medical school in northern Jordan. A convenience sample of medical students were asked to fill a survey comprising the Self-Efficacy in Palliative Care Scale (SEPC) and Thanatophobia Scale (TS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 289 students were enrolled in this study. In their first year of clinical training, 137 were female and 130 were students. In the SEPC, discussing the patient's death with the patient was the domain in which the students were least confident. Confidence in working on a multi-professional PC team was recognized as the highest skill area among the participants. Confidence in students' ability to assess patients' pain needs was identified as the most confident skill, whereas their ability to prescribe appropriate pain control medications was the lowest. There was a significant difference in TS between the female and male medical students.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An integrated pain and PC curriculum in medical schools is essential to help students achieve confidence in pain management and palliative care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Science OA\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"2553474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12498538/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Science OA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20565623.2025.2553474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Science OA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20565623.2025.2553474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toward comprehensive palliative care training: addressing gender and training stage differences in medical education.
Background: Palliative care (PC) education is globally recommended; however, many regions lack sufficient training. This study aimed to evaluate medical students' confidence in PC and pain management and to compare confidence levels according to year of training and both male and female genders.
Methods: This observational study was conducted at a medical school in northern Jordan. A convenience sample of medical students were asked to fill a survey comprising the Self-Efficacy in Palliative Care Scale (SEPC) and Thanatophobia Scale (TS).
Results: In total, 289 students were enrolled in this study. In their first year of clinical training, 137 were female and 130 were students. In the SEPC, discussing the patient's death with the patient was the domain in which the students were least confident. Confidence in working on a multi-professional PC team was recognized as the highest skill area among the participants. Confidence in students' ability to assess patients' pain needs was identified as the most confident skill, whereas their ability to prescribe appropriate pain control medications was the lowest. There was a significant difference in TS between the female and male medical students.
Conclusion: An integrated pain and PC curriculum in medical schools is essential to help students achieve confidence in pain management and palliative care.
期刊介绍:
Future Science OA is an online, open access, peer-reviewed title from the Future Science Group. The journal covers research and discussion related to advances in biotechnology, medicine and health. The journal embraces the importance of publishing all good-quality research with the potential to further the progress of research in these fields. All original research articles will be considered that are within the journal''s scope, and have been conducted with scientific rigour and research integrity. The journal also features review articles, editorials and perspectives, providing readers with a leading source of commentary and analysis. Submissions of the following article types will be considered: -Research articles -Preliminary communications -Short communications -Methodologies -Trial design articles -Trial results (including early-phase and negative studies) -Reviews -Perspectives -Commentaries