在2023年马德里室内世界花式巡回赛中,由同一对选手完成的最后两枪序列:射击类型和效果的性别差异。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Iván Martín-Miguel, Diego Muñoz, Bernardino Javier Sánchez-Alcaraz, Rafael Conde-Ripoll, Adrián Escudero-Tena
{"title":"在2023年马德里室内世界花式巡回赛中,由同一对选手完成的最后两枪序列:射击类型和效果的性别差异。","authors":"Iván Martín-Miguel, Diego Muñoz, Bernardino Javier Sánchez-Alcaraz, Rafael Conde-Ripoll, Adrián Escudero-Tena","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2025-0191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recalling game patterns is crucial for achieving expert performance in padel; however, the sequence of the last 2 shots played by the same pair remains underexplored. Therefore, this study analyzed these sequences in professional padel, distinguishing between points ending in a winner or an error and examining potential sex differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 878 points (men 504, women 374) from 10 matches (men 5, women 5) of the 2023 Madrid Indoor Master of the World Padel Tour circuit were analyzed using systematic observation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effectiveness of the final 2-shot sequence in men's and women's padel significantly differed in terms of winners and errors (men P < .001, Cramer V coefficient [Vc] = 0.724; women P < .001, Vc = 0.559). The most effective sequences in men's padel were volley-smash, volley-volley, and lob-recovery smash, whereas in women's padel, these were volley-smash, volley-volley, and bandeja-smash. Conversely, the sequences leading to the highest number of errors in men's padel were volley-volley, lob-forehand/backhand, and forehand/backhand-forehand/backhand, whereas in women's padel, they were lob-forehand/backhand, lob-volley, and forehand/backhand-volley. No significant sex-based differences were found in errors (P > .05, Vc = 0.063), although the volley-volley sequence resulted in more errors than expected (adjusted standardized residual [ASR] = 3.1). However, significant sex-based differences were found in winners (P < .001, Vc = 0.464). In men's padel, volley-smash (ASR = 4.1) and lob-recovery smash (ASR = 2.3) sequences produced more winners than expected, whereas in women's padel, it was smash-forehand/backhand (ASR = 2.3), forehand/backhand-volley (ASR = 2.1), forehand/backhand-forehand/backhand (ASR = 2.9), lob-bajada (ASR = 2.6), and lob-forehand/backhand (ASR = 3.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight key shot sequences' effectiveness and provide insights for optimizing professional padel performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Final 2-Shot Sequence Performed by the Same Pair During the World Padel Tour Madrid Indoor 2023 Master: Sex Differences in Shot Type and Effectiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Iván Martín-Miguel, Diego Muñoz, Bernardino Javier Sánchez-Alcaraz, Rafael Conde-Ripoll, Adrián Escudero-Tena\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/ijspp.2025-0191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recalling game patterns is crucial for achieving expert performance in padel; however, the sequence of the last 2 shots played by the same pair remains underexplored. Therefore, this study analyzed these sequences in professional padel, distinguishing between points ending in a winner or an error and examining potential sex differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 878 points (men 504, women 374) from 10 matches (men 5, women 5) of the 2023 Madrid Indoor Master of the World Padel Tour circuit were analyzed using systematic observation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effectiveness of the final 2-shot sequence in men's and women's padel significantly differed in terms of winners and errors (men P < .001, Cramer V coefficient [Vc] = 0.724; women P < .001, Vc = 0.559). The most effective sequences in men's padel were volley-smash, volley-volley, and lob-recovery smash, whereas in women's padel, these were volley-smash, volley-volley, and bandeja-smash. Conversely, the sequences leading to the highest number of errors in men's padel were volley-volley, lob-forehand/backhand, and forehand/backhand-forehand/backhand, whereas in women's padel, they were lob-forehand/backhand, lob-volley, and forehand/backhand-volley. No significant sex-based differences were found in errors (P > .05, Vc = 0.063), although the volley-volley sequence resulted in more errors than expected (adjusted standardized residual [ASR] = 3.1). However, significant sex-based differences were found in winners (P < .001, Vc = 0.464). In men's padel, volley-smash (ASR = 4.1) and lob-recovery smash (ASR = 2.3) sequences produced more winners than expected, whereas in women's padel, it was smash-forehand/backhand (ASR = 2.3), forehand/backhand-volley (ASR = 2.1), forehand/backhand-forehand/backhand (ASR = 2.9), lob-bajada (ASR = 2.6), and lob-forehand/backhand (ASR = 3.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight key shot sequences' effectiveness and provide insights for optimizing professional padel performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of sports physiology and performance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of sports physiology and performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2025-0191\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2025-0191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:回忆游戏模式是达到游戏专家水平的关键;然而,最后两个镜头的顺序仍然没有得到充分的研究。因此,本研究在专业模式下分析了这些序列,区分了以赢家或错误结尾的点,并研究了潜在的性别差异。方法:采用系统观察的方法,对2023年马德里室内大师世界帕德尔巡回赛10场比赛(男5场,女5场)的878分(男504分,女374分)进行分析。结果:男式和女式最后2发序列在优胜率和失误率上的有效性差异有统计学意义(男性P < 0.001,克莱默V系数[Vc] = 0.724;女性P < 0.001, Vc = 0.559)。男子组最有效的动作顺序是截击、截击、高球扣杀,而女组最有效的动作顺序是截击、截击、扣杀。相反,在男子乒乓比赛中,导致失误最多的顺序是截击-截击、高球-正手/反手、正手/反手、正手/反手,而在女子乒乓比赛中,导致失误最多的顺序是高球-正手/反手、高球-截击、正手/反手。尽管排球-排球序列导致的误差比预期的要多(调整后的标准化残差[ASR] = 3.1),但在误差方面没有发现显著的性别差异(P < 0.05, Vc = 0.063)。然而,获胜者存在显著的性别差异(P < 0.001, Vc = 0.464)。在男子组中,截击-扣球(ASR = 4.1)和高球-回传扣球(ASR = 2.3)序列产生的赢家多于预期,而在女子组中,扣球-正手/反手(ASR = 2.1)、正手/反手-正手/反手(ASR = 2.9)、高球-倒打(ASR = 2.6)和高球-正手/反手(ASR = 3.0)序列产生的赢家多于预期。结论:这些发现突出了关键镜头序列的有效性,并为优化专业模特的表现提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Final 2-Shot Sequence Performed by the Same Pair During the World Padel Tour Madrid Indoor 2023 Master: Sex Differences in Shot Type and Effectiveness.

Purpose: Recalling game patterns is crucial for achieving expert performance in padel; however, the sequence of the last 2 shots played by the same pair remains underexplored. Therefore, this study analyzed these sequences in professional padel, distinguishing between points ending in a winner or an error and examining potential sex differences.

Methods: A total of 878 points (men 504, women 374) from 10 matches (men 5, women 5) of the 2023 Madrid Indoor Master of the World Padel Tour circuit were analyzed using systematic observation.

Results: The effectiveness of the final 2-shot sequence in men's and women's padel significantly differed in terms of winners and errors (men P < .001, Cramer V coefficient [Vc] = 0.724; women P < .001, Vc = 0.559). The most effective sequences in men's padel were volley-smash, volley-volley, and lob-recovery smash, whereas in women's padel, these were volley-smash, volley-volley, and bandeja-smash. Conversely, the sequences leading to the highest number of errors in men's padel were volley-volley, lob-forehand/backhand, and forehand/backhand-forehand/backhand, whereas in women's padel, they were lob-forehand/backhand, lob-volley, and forehand/backhand-volley. No significant sex-based differences were found in errors (P > .05, Vc = 0.063), although the volley-volley sequence resulted in more errors than expected (adjusted standardized residual [ASR] = 3.1). However, significant sex-based differences were found in winners (P < .001, Vc = 0.464). In men's padel, volley-smash (ASR = 4.1) and lob-recovery smash (ASR = 2.3) sequences produced more winners than expected, whereas in women's padel, it was smash-forehand/backhand (ASR = 2.3), forehand/backhand-volley (ASR = 2.1), forehand/backhand-forehand/backhand (ASR = 2.9), lob-bajada (ASR = 2.6), and lob-forehand/backhand (ASR = 3.0).

Conclusions: These findings highlight key shot sequences' effectiveness and provide insights for optimizing professional padel performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
199
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信