可切除的老年非小细胞肺癌患者围手术期免疫检查点抑制剂:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1589846
Yue Cao, Yumeng Tian, Lin Li
{"title":"可切除的老年非小细胞肺癌患者围手术期免疫检查点抑制剂:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yue Cao, Yumeng Tian, Lin Li","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1589846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative immunotherapy has shown promising results in patients with resectable stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its benefits for the specific subgroup of elderly patients remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative immunotherapy in elderly NSCLC patients aged 65 and above, focusing on key metrics such as pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that reported subgroup data on elderly patients regarding pCR rates and hazard ratios (HRs) for EFS and OS. Data were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and proceedings of oncology conferences from January 2020 to June 2025.A fixed effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Aggregated pooled HRs for time-to-event outcomes (EFS and OS), odds ratios (OR) and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes (pCR) were calculated specifically for patients aged ≥65 years who received perioperative immunotherapy or placebo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 randomized controlled trials involving 1561 patients aged ≥65 years with resectable NSCLC were included. A significant benefit was observed in terms of pCR (risk ratio, 5.26; 95% CI, 3.54 - 7.82; I² = 0%) and EFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55 - 0.74; I² = 7%) for patients aged ≥65 years who received perioperative immunotherapy compared with placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that perioperative immunotherapy was superior to placebo in terms of pathological and event-free survival for patients aged ≥65 years. These findings provide age-specific evidence to inform precision decision-making for treating the elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420250654072.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1589846"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients with resectable NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yue Cao, Yumeng Tian, Lin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fonc.2025.1589846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative immunotherapy has shown promising results in patients with resectable stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its benefits for the specific subgroup of elderly patients remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative immunotherapy in elderly NSCLC patients aged 65 and above, focusing on key metrics such as pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that reported subgroup data on elderly patients regarding pCR rates and hazard ratios (HRs) for EFS and OS. Data were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and proceedings of oncology conferences from January 2020 to June 2025.A fixed effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Aggregated pooled HRs for time-to-event outcomes (EFS and OS), odds ratios (OR) and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes (pCR) were calculated specifically for patients aged ≥65 years who received perioperative immunotherapy or placebo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 randomized controlled trials involving 1561 patients aged ≥65 years with resectable NSCLC were included. A significant benefit was observed in terms of pCR (risk ratio, 5.26; 95% CI, 3.54 - 7.82; I² = 0%) and EFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55 - 0.74; I² = 7%) for patients aged ≥65 years who received perioperative immunotherapy compared with placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that perioperative immunotherapy was superior to placebo in terms of pathological and event-free survival for patients aged ≥65 years. These findings provide age-specific evidence to inform precision decision-making for treating the elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420250654072.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Oncology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1589846\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483896/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1589846\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1589846","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:围手术期免疫治疗在可切除的II-III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中显示出良好的效果。然而,它对老年患者这一特定亚群的益处尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估65岁及以上老年NSCLC患者围手术期免疫治疗的疗效,重点关注病理完全缓解(pCR)、无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)等关键指标。方法:我们对随机临床试验进行了全面的荟萃分析,报告了老年患者关于EFS和OS的pCR率和风险比(hr)的亚组数据。数据从PubMed、EMBASE和2020年1月至2025年6月的肿瘤学会议论文集中检索。meta分析采用固定效应模型。针对年龄≥65岁接受围手术期免疫治疗或安慰剂治疗的患者,计算了事件发生时间结局(EFS和OS)的汇总hr、二分类结局(pCR)的优势比(OR)和风险比(rr)。结果:共纳入8项随机对照试验,涉及1561例年龄≥65岁的可切除NSCLC患者。与安慰剂相比,年龄≥65岁接受围手术期免疫治疗的患者在pCR(风险比,5.26;95% CI, 3.54 - 7.82; I²= 0%)和EFS(风险比,0.64;95% CI, 0.55 - 0.74; I²= 7%)方面有显著的获益。结论:我们的系统回顾和荟萃分析表明,对于年龄≥65岁的患者,围手术期免疫治疗在病理和无事件生存方面优于安慰剂。这些发现为治疗老年患者的精确决策提供了特定年龄的证据。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/,标识符CRD420250654072。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients with resectable NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Perioperative immunotherapy has shown promising results in patients with resectable stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its benefits for the specific subgroup of elderly patients remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative immunotherapy in elderly NSCLC patients aged 65 and above, focusing on key metrics such as pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS).

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that reported subgroup data on elderly patients regarding pCR rates and hazard ratios (HRs) for EFS and OS. Data were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and proceedings of oncology conferences from January 2020 to June 2025.A fixed effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Aggregated pooled HRs for time-to-event outcomes (EFS and OS), odds ratios (OR) and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes (pCR) were calculated specifically for patients aged ≥65 years who received perioperative immunotherapy or placebo.

Results: A total of 8 randomized controlled trials involving 1561 patients aged ≥65 years with resectable NSCLC were included. A significant benefit was observed in terms of pCR (risk ratio, 5.26; 95% CI, 3.54 - 7.82; I² = 0%) and EFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55 - 0.74; I² = 7%) for patients aged ≥65 years who received perioperative immunotherapy compared with placebo.

Conclusion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that perioperative immunotherapy was superior to placebo in terms of pathological and event-free survival for patients aged ≥65 years. These findings provide age-specific evidence to inform precision decision-making for treating the elderly patients.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420250654072.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信