结直肠癌化疗患者胱抑素S的临床价值。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1640646
Tingting Han, Shijie Deng, Dongmei Xia, Kun Jin, Chao Mei
{"title":"结直肠癌化疗患者胱抑素S的临床价值。","authors":"Tingting Han, Shijie Deng, Dongmei Xia, Kun Jin, Chao Mei","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1640646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic utility of serum cystatin S (CST4) in chemotherapy-treated colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and establish its complementary value to conventional tumor markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 81 CRC patients receiving chemotherapy and 83 colorectal polyp controls. Serum CST4 levels were quantified by ELISA alongside six conventional tumor markers (CEA, CA125, CA153, CA199, AFP, CA724). Diagnostic performance was assessed through ROC analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Additionally, <i>in vitro</i> experiments with HCT116 CRC cells were conducted to validate the regulatory relationship between CST4 and PDGFRB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CRC patients exhibited significantly elevated CST4 levels compared to polyp controls (median [IQR]: 54.07 [32.18-91.49] vs 37.48 [24.18-49.28] U/mL, P<0.05). CST4 demonstrated superior diagnostic performance with AUC = 0.689 (95%CI:0.607-0.771), outperforming individual conventional markers. Notably, CST4 maintained diagnostic independence across tumor stages (P>0.05) and age groups. A multimodal diagnostic model combining CST4 with CEA, CA724, and CA125 significantly enhanced detection capability (AUC = 0.828, sensitivity 74.1%, specificity 81.9%), representing a 28.4% sensitivity improvement over CST4 alone. <i>In vitro</i>, CST4 knockdown in HCT116 cells led to a 68.3% reduction in PDGFRB expression (P<0.0001), validating a regulatory axis between CST4 and PDGFRB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CST4 emerges as a stable post-chemotherapy biomarker that effectively discriminates malignant colorectal lesions. Its integration with conventional markers creates a robust diagnostic algorithm, while functional validation supports a mechanistic role via PDGFRB-mediated pathways. These findings position CST4 as a promising candidate for therapeutic monitoring and recurrence detection in CRC management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1640646"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical value of cystatin S in patients with colorectal cancer chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Tingting Han, Shijie Deng, Dongmei Xia, Kun Jin, Chao Mei\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fonc.2025.1640646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic utility of serum cystatin S (CST4) in chemotherapy-treated colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and establish its complementary value to conventional tumor markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 81 CRC patients receiving chemotherapy and 83 colorectal polyp controls. Serum CST4 levels were quantified by ELISA alongside six conventional tumor markers (CEA, CA125, CA153, CA199, AFP, CA724). Diagnostic performance was assessed through ROC analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Additionally, <i>in vitro</i> experiments with HCT116 CRC cells were conducted to validate the regulatory relationship between CST4 and PDGFRB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CRC patients exhibited significantly elevated CST4 levels compared to polyp controls (median [IQR]: 54.07 [32.18-91.49] vs 37.48 [24.18-49.28] U/mL, P<0.05). CST4 demonstrated superior diagnostic performance with AUC = 0.689 (95%CI:0.607-0.771), outperforming individual conventional markers. Notably, CST4 maintained diagnostic independence across tumor stages (P>0.05) and age groups. A multimodal diagnostic model combining CST4 with CEA, CA724, and CA125 significantly enhanced detection capability (AUC = 0.828, sensitivity 74.1%, specificity 81.9%), representing a 28.4% sensitivity improvement over CST4 alone. <i>In vitro</i>, CST4 knockdown in HCT116 cells led to a 68.3% reduction in PDGFRB expression (P<0.0001), validating a regulatory axis between CST4 and PDGFRB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CST4 emerges as a stable post-chemotherapy biomarker that effectively discriminates malignant colorectal lesions. Its integration with conventional markers creates a robust diagnostic algorithm, while functional validation supports a mechanistic role via PDGFRB-mediated pathways. These findings position CST4 as a promising candidate for therapeutic monitoring and recurrence detection in CRC management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Oncology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1640646\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1640646\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1640646","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价血清胱抑素S (CST4)在结直肠癌(CRC)化疗患者中的诊断价值,并确定其与常规肿瘤标志物的互补价值。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了81例接受化疗的结直肠癌患者和83例结直肠息肉对照组。ELISA检测血清CST4水平,同时检测6种常规肿瘤标志物(CEA、CA125、CA153、CA199、AFP、CA724)。通过ROC分析和多变量logistic回归评估诊断效果。此外,我们还对HCT116 CRC细胞进行了体外实验,以验证CST4与PDGFRB之间的调控关系。结果:与息肉对照组相比,结直肠癌患者CST4水平明显升高(中位[IQR]: 54.07[32.18-91.49]对37.48 [24.18-49.28]U/mL, P0.05)。CST4联合CEA、CA724和CA125的多模态诊断模型显著提高了检测能力(AUC = 0.828,灵敏度74.1%,特异性81.9%),比CST4单独诊断提高了28.4%的灵敏度。在体外,HCT116细胞中CST4敲低导致PDGFRB表达降低68.3% (p结论:CST4是一种稳定的化疗后生物标志物,可有效鉴别结直肠恶性病变。它与传统标记物的集成创建了一个强大的诊断算法,而功能验证支持通过pdgfrb介导的途径发挥机制作用。这些发现将CST4定位为CRC治疗监测和复发检测的有希望的候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical value of cystatin S in patients with colorectal cancer chemotherapy.

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of serum cystatin S (CST4) in chemotherapy-treated colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and establish its complementary value to conventional tumor markers.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 81 CRC patients receiving chemotherapy and 83 colorectal polyp controls. Serum CST4 levels were quantified by ELISA alongside six conventional tumor markers (CEA, CA125, CA153, CA199, AFP, CA724). Diagnostic performance was assessed through ROC analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Additionally, in vitro experiments with HCT116 CRC cells were conducted to validate the regulatory relationship between CST4 and PDGFRB.

Results: CRC patients exhibited significantly elevated CST4 levels compared to polyp controls (median [IQR]: 54.07 [32.18-91.49] vs 37.48 [24.18-49.28] U/mL, P<0.05). CST4 demonstrated superior diagnostic performance with AUC = 0.689 (95%CI:0.607-0.771), outperforming individual conventional markers. Notably, CST4 maintained diagnostic independence across tumor stages (P>0.05) and age groups. A multimodal diagnostic model combining CST4 with CEA, CA724, and CA125 significantly enhanced detection capability (AUC = 0.828, sensitivity 74.1%, specificity 81.9%), representing a 28.4% sensitivity improvement over CST4 alone. In vitro, CST4 knockdown in HCT116 cells led to a 68.3% reduction in PDGFRB expression (P<0.0001), validating a regulatory axis between CST4 and PDGFRB.

Conclusion: CST4 emerges as a stable post-chemotherapy biomarker that effectively discriminates malignant colorectal lesions. Its integration with conventional markers creates a robust diagnostic algorithm, while functional validation supports a mechanistic role via PDGFRB-mediated pathways. These findings position CST4 as a promising candidate for therapeutic monitoring and recurrence detection in CRC management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信