{"title":"生化甲烷电位测试在预测农场规模沼气池在精神营养条件下的性能方面的局限性。","authors":"Glen Madrigal, Liz Quispe, Diyane Mango, Jaime Jaimes-Estévez, Oscar Mendieta, Liliana Castro-Molano, Humberto Escalante, Jaime Martí-Herrero","doi":"10.1080/09593330.2025.2567079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the extent to which laboratory-scale biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays predict actual methane production in a full-scale tubular anaerobic digester operating under psychrotrophic conditions. The 8 m³ farm-scale digester, situated in a cold, high-altitude climate, was retrofitted with passive solar heating, resulting in an average sludge temperature of 21.5 ± 1.2°C. In contrast, the mean ambient temperature was kept at 10.6 ± 1.4°C. BMP tests were conducted using the digester influent and effluent as substrate and inoculum, respectively, at mesophilic (35 ± 2°C) and psychrotrophic (23 ± 2°C) temperatures. The methane yield in the full-scale system (0.36 Nm³ CH₄ kg<sup>-</sup>¹ VS), operated at an average temperature of 21.5°C, significantly exceeded the values obtained in the batch BMP tests (0.19 Nm³ CH₄ kg<sup>-</sup>¹ VS at 35°C and 0.18 Nm³ CH₄ kg<sup>-</sup>¹ VS at 23°C). No statistically significant correlation was found between laboratory and field data. These findings show the limited predictive power of BMP testing for farm-scale digester performance in decentralized, low-temperature environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12009,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limitations of biochemical methane potential testing in forecasting farm-scale digester performance under psychrotrophic conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Glen Madrigal, Liz Quispe, Diyane Mango, Jaime Jaimes-Estévez, Oscar Mendieta, Liliana Castro-Molano, Humberto Escalante, Jaime Martí-Herrero\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593330.2025.2567079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated the extent to which laboratory-scale biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays predict actual methane production in a full-scale tubular anaerobic digester operating under psychrotrophic conditions. The 8 m³ farm-scale digester, situated in a cold, high-altitude climate, was retrofitted with passive solar heating, resulting in an average sludge temperature of 21.5 ± 1.2°C. In contrast, the mean ambient temperature was kept at 10.6 ± 1.4°C. BMP tests were conducted using the digester influent and effluent as substrate and inoculum, respectively, at mesophilic (35 ± 2°C) and psychrotrophic (23 ± 2°C) temperatures. The methane yield in the full-scale system (0.36 Nm³ CH₄ kg<sup>-</sup>¹ VS), operated at an average temperature of 21.5°C, significantly exceeded the values obtained in the batch BMP tests (0.19 Nm³ CH₄ kg<sup>-</sup>¹ VS at 35°C and 0.18 Nm³ CH₄ kg<sup>-</sup>¹ VS at 23°C). No statistically significant correlation was found between laboratory and field data. These findings show the limited predictive power of BMP testing for farm-scale digester performance in decentralized, low-temperature environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2025.2567079\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2025.2567079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Limitations of biochemical methane potential testing in forecasting farm-scale digester performance under psychrotrophic conditions.
This study evaluated the extent to which laboratory-scale biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays predict actual methane production in a full-scale tubular anaerobic digester operating under psychrotrophic conditions. The 8 m³ farm-scale digester, situated in a cold, high-altitude climate, was retrofitted with passive solar heating, resulting in an average sludge temperature of 21.5 ± 1.2°C. In contrast, the mean ambient temperature was kept at 10.6 ± 1.4°C. BMP tests were conducted using the digester influent and effluent as substrate and inoculum, respectively, at mesophilic (35 ± 2°C) and psychrotrophic (23 ± 2°C) temperatures. The methane yield in the full-scale system (0.36 Nm³ CH₄ kg-¹ VS), operated at an average temperature of 21.5°C, significantly exceeded the values obtained in the batch BMP tests (0.19 Nm³ CH₄ kg-¹ VS at 35°C and 0.18 Nm³ CH₄ kg-¹ VS at 23°C). No statistically significant correlation was found between laboratory and field data. These findings show the limited predictive power of BMP testing for farm-scale digester performance in decentralized, low-temperature environments.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Technology is a leading journal for the rapid publication of science and technology papers on a wide range of topics in applied environmental studies, from environmental engineering to environmental biotechnology, the circular economy, municipal and industrial wastewater management, drinking-water treatment, air- and water-pollution control, solid-waste management, industrial hygiene and associated technologies.
Environmental Technology is intended to provide rapid publication of new developments in environmental technology. The journal has an international readership with a broad scientific base. Contributions will be accepted from scientists and engineers in industry, government and universities. Accepted manuscripts are generally published within four months.
Please note that Environmental Technology does not publish any review papers unless for a specified special issue which is decided by the Editor. Please do submit your review papers to our sister journal Environmental Technology Reviews at http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tetr20/current