Pengfei Li, Jihao Mu, Zhao Wang, Xiaochong Zhang, Yingze Zhang, Dengxiang Liu, Ao Li
{"title":"骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折u型有限元模型的建立与验证。","authors":"Pengfei Li, Jihao Mu, Zhao Wang, Xiaochong Zhang, Yingze Zhang, Dengxiang Liu, Ao Li","doi":"10.3389/fbioe.2025.1617208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is recognized as a common complication of osteoporosis. Biomechanical alterations in the affected and adjacent vertebrae have a significant influence on patient symptoms, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, establishing an accurate model of OVCF remains a highly challenging task. In this study, a novel finite-element model of OVCF was developed and validated, and a comprehensive biomechanical analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Computed tomography data of the thoracolumbar spine (T12-L2) were collected from an OVCF patient and a healthy volunteer to establish the OVCF and normal models, respectively. Based on the normal model, U-type, V-type, and double-V-type finite element models were constructed. Intervertebral disks and articular cartilage were generated through a combination of appropriate materials and assemblies, followed by the development of three-dimensional finite-element biomechanical models. The magnitude and distribution of stress and displacement in these three models were evaluated and compared with those of the OVCF model under various directions of motion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the force distribution contour diagrams, the U-type model at the T12 vertebra most closely resembled the OVCF model, particularly in the directions of forward flexion, backward extension, left lateral bending, and left rotation. Force distribution patterns and stress concentration areas in all six directions were generally consistent between the U-type and OVCF models. At the L2 vertebra, the U-type model demonstrated the greatest similarity to the OVCF model in the direction of left lateral bending. At the T12/L1 intervertebral disk, no significant differences in the force distribution were observed among the four models. At the L1/2 intervertebral disk, the U-type and OVCF models showed the closest correspondence in the direction of forward flexion. In the displacement contour diagrams, the maximum displacements of the U-type model were found to be 1.7876 mm (forward flexion), 6.1564 mm (posterior extension), 4.6520 mm (left lateral bending), 6.2224 mm (right lateral bending), 3.4119 mm (left rotation), and 3.1601 mm (right rotation). Notably, in the direction of left lateral bending, the U-type model most closely approximated the displacement distribution of the OVCF model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The U-type finite-element model more accurately reproduces the biomechanical characteristics of OVCF and demonstrates high applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12444,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1617208"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construction and validation of a U-type finite element model of an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.\",\"authors\":\"Pengfei Li, Jihao Mu, Zhao Wang, Xiaochong Zhang, Yingze Zhang, Dengxiang Liu, Ao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fbioe.2025.1617208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is recognized as a common complication of osteoporosis. Biomechanical alterations in the affected and adjacent vertebrae have a significant influence on patient symptoms, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, establishing an accurate model of OVCF remains a highly challenging task. In this study, a novel finite-element model of OVCF was developed and validated, and a comprehensive biomechanical analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Computed tomography data of the thoracolumbar spine (T12-L2) were collected from an OVCF patient and a healthy volunteer to establish the OVCF and normal models, respectively. Based on the normal model, U-type, V-type, and double-V-type finite element models were constructed. Intervertebral disks and articular cartilage were generated through a combination of appropriate materials and assemblies, followed by the development of three-dimensional finite-element biomechanical models. The magnitude and distribution of stress and displacement in these three models were evaluated and compared with those of the OVCF model under various directions of motion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the force distribution contour diagrams, the U-type model at the T12 vertebra most closely resembled the OVCF model, particularly in the directions of forward flexion, backward extension, left lateral bending, and left rotation. Force distribution patterns and stress concentration areas in all six directions were generally consistent between the U-type and OVCF models. At the L2 vertebra, the U-type model demonstrated the greatest similarity to the OVCF model in the direction of left lateral bending. At the T12/L1 intervertebral disk, no significant differences in the force distribution were observed among the four models. At the L1/2 intervertebral disk, the U-type and OVCF models showed the closest correspondence in the direction of forward flexion. In the displacement contour diagrams, the maximum displacements of the U-type model were found to be 1.7876 mm (forward flexion), 6.1564 mm (posterior extension), 4.6520 mm (left lateral bending), 6.2224 mm (right lateral bending), 3.4119 mm (left rotation), and 3.1601 mm (right rotation). Notably, in the direction of left lateral bending, the U-type model most closely approximated the displacement distribution of the OVCF model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The U-type finite-element model more accurately reproduces the biomechanical characteristics of OVCF and demonstrates high applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1617208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485499/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1617208\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1617208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Construction and validation of a U-type finite element model of an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.
Background: An osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is recognized as a common complication of osteoporosis. Biomechanical alterations in the affected and adjacent vertebrae have a significant influence on patient symptoms, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, establishing an accurate model of OVCF remains a highly challenging task. In this study, a novel finite-element model of OVCF was developed and validated, and a comprehensive biomechanical analysis was conducted.
Methods: Computed tomography data of the thoracolumbar spine (T12-L2) were collected from an OVCF patient and a healthy volunteer to establish the OVCF and normal models, respectively. Based on the normal model, U-type, V-type, and double-V-type finite element models were constructed. Intervertebral disks and articular cartilage were generated through a combination of appropriate materials and assemblies, followed by the development of three-dimensional finite-element biomechanical models. The magnitude and distribution of stress and displacement in these three models were evaluated and compared with those of the OVCF model under various directions of motion.
Results: In the force distribution contour diagrams, the U-type model at the T12 vertebra most closely resembled the OVCF model, particularly in the directions of forward flexion, backward extension, left lateral bending, and left rotation. Force distribution patterns and stress concentration areas in all six directions were generally consistent between the U-type and OVCF models. At the L2 vertebra, the U-type model demonstrated the greatest similarity to the OVCF model in the direction of left lateral bending. At the T12/L1 intervertebral disk, no significant differences in the force distribution were observed among the four models. At the L1/2 intervertebral disk, the U-type and OVCF models showed the closest correspondence in the direction of forward flexion. In the displacement contour diagrams, the maximum displacements of the U-type model were found to be 1.7876 mm (forward flexion), 6.1564 mm (posterior extension), 4.6520 mm (left lateral bending), 6.2224 mm (right lateral bending), 3.4119 mm (left rotation), and 3.1601 mm (right rotation). Notably, in the direction of left lateral bending, the U-type model most closely approximated the displacement distribution of the OVCF model.
Conclusion: The U-type finite-element model more accurately reproduces the biomechanical characteristics of OVCF and demonstrates high applicability.
期刊介绍:
The translation of new discoveries in medicine to clinical routine has never been easy. During the second half of the last century, thanks to the progress in chemistry, biochemistry and pharmacology, we have seen the development and the application of a large number of drugs and devices aimed at the treatment of symptoms, blocking unwanted pathways and, in the case of infectious diseases, fighting the micro-organisms responsible. However, we are facing, today, a dramatic change in the therapeutic approach to pathologies and diseases. Indeed, the challenge of the present and the next decade is to fully restore the physiological status of the diseased organism and to completely regenerate tissue and organs when they are so seriously affected that treatments cannot be limited to the repression of symptoms or to the repair of damage. This is being made possible thanks to the major developments made in basic cell and molecular biology, including stem cell science, growth factor delivery, gene isolation and transfection, the advances in bioengineering and nanotechnology, including development of new biomaterials, biofabrication technologies and use of bioreactors, and the big improvements in diagnostic tools and imaging of cells, tissues and organs.
In today`s world, an enhancement of communication between multidisciplinary experts, together with the promotion of joint projects and close collaborations among scientists, engineers, industry people, regulatory agencies and physicians are absolute requirements for the success of any attempt to develop and clinically apply a new biological therapy or an innovative device involving the collective use of biomaterials, cells and/or bioactive molecules. “Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology” aspires to be a forum for all people involved in the process by bridging the gap too often existing between a discovery in the basic sciences and its clinical application.