尿样中噬菌体PAA和PAM的鉴定及其对铜绿假单胞菌PAZMYU的抗菌协同作用评价。

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Aneela Nawaz, Nauman Ahmed Khalid, Alina Majid, Muqaddas Shahzadi, Sabeena Zafar, Muhammad Ismail Khan, Nasir Khan, Ali Khalid, Aamer Ali Shah, Malik Badshah, Samiullah Khan
{"title":"尿样中噬菌体PAA和PAM的鉴定及其对铜绿假单胞菌PAZMYU的抗菌协同作用评价。","authors":"Aneela Nawaz, Nauman Ahmed Khalid, Alina Majid, Muqaddas Shahzadi, Sabeena Zafar, Muhammad Ismail Khan, Nasir Khan, Ali Khalid, Aamer Ali Shah, Malik Badshah, Samiullah Khan","doi":"10.1186/s12866-025-04195-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotic resistance has been attributed to both the overuse of current drugs and the lack of availability of newer drugs due to stringent regulatory requirements and reduced commercial incentives. Novel alternative therapies, such as phage treatments, have demonstrated promising outcomes in clinical trials, indicating their potential for treating recalcitrant infections in the future. The objective of this study was to isolate and characterize bacteriophages against a uropathogenic strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of combining sub-inhibitory concentrations of cefepime and meropenem with the isolated bacteriophages. The isolated phages were designated PAA and PAM, both exhibiting icosahedral heads and long non-contractile tails. Both phages maintained stability within Limited pH and temperature ranges. The optimal adsorption times for PAA and PAM were 10 and 20 min, respectively, with PAA demonstrating a short latent time and burst size of 47, while PAM exhibited a burst size of 83. The optimal multiplicity of infection for PAA was 1, and for PAM was 0.1. PAA demonstrated efficacy against 40% of the tested strains of P. aeruginosa, while PAM was effective against 64%. Both phages remained stable at subinhibitory concentrations of cefepime and meropenem and when employed with sub-inhibitory concentrations of cefepime and meropenem, exhibited synergistic effects against planktonic bacterial cells and demonstrated efficacy in both biofilm inhibition and eradication.</p>","PeriodicalId":9233,"journal":{"name":"BMC Microbiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"605"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of bacteriophages PAA and PAM and evaluation of their antibiotic synergy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAZMYU isolated from urine sample.\",\"authors\":\"Aneela Nawaz, Nauman Ahmed Khalid, Alina Majid, Muqaddas Shahzadi, Sabeena Zafar, Muhammad Ismail Khan, Nasir Khan, Ali Khalid, Aamer Ali Shah, Malik Badshah, Samiullah Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12866-025-04195-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antibiotic resistance has been attributed to both the overuse of current drugs and the lack of availability of newer drugs due to stringent regulatory requirements and reduced commercial incentives. Novel alternative therapies, such as phage treatments, have demonstrated promising outcomes in clinical trials, indicating their potential for treating recalcitrant infections in the future. The objective of this study was to isolate and characterize bacteriophages against a uropathogenic strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of combining sub-inhibitory concentrations of cefepime and meropenem with the isolated bacteriophages. The isolated phages were designated PAA and PAM, both exhibiting icosahedral heads and long non-contractile tails. Both phages maintained stability within Limited pH and temperature ranges. The optimal adsorption times for PAA and PAM were 10 and 20 min, respectively, with PAA demonstrating a short latent time and burst size of 47, while PAM exhibited a burst size of 83. The optimal multiplicity of infection for PAA was 1, and for PAM was 0.1. PAA demonstrated efficacy against 40% of the tested strains of P. aeruginosa, while PAM was effective against 64%. Both phages remained stable at subinhibitory concentrations of cefepime and meropenem and when employed with sub-inhibitory concentrations of cefepime and meropenem, exhibited synergistic effects against planktonic bacterial cells and demonstrated efficacy in both biofilm inhibition and eradication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492957/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-04195-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-04195-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗生素耐药性归因于现有药物的过度使用以及由于严格的监管要求和商业激励减少而缺乏新药。新的替代疗法,如噬菌体治疗,已经在临床试验中显示出有希望的结果,表明它们在未来治疗顽固性感染的潜力。本研究的目的是分离并鉴定抗尿路病原菌铜绿假单胞菌的噬菌体,并评价亚抑制浓度的头孢吡肟和美罗培南与分离的噬菌体联合使用的抗菌效果。分离得到的噬菌体分别被命名为PAA和PAM,均呈二十面体头部和长而不收缩的尾部。两种噬菌体在有限的pH和温度范围内保持稳定。PAA和PAM的最佳吸附时间分别为10 min和20 min,其中PAA的潜伏时间较短,爆发大小为47,PAM的爆发大小为83。PAA的最佳感染次数为1,PAM的最佳感染次数为0.1。PAA对40%的铜绿假单胞菌有效,而PAM对64%的菌株有效。两种噬菌体在头孢吡肟和美罗培南的亚抑制浓度下保持稳定,当与头孢吡肟和美罗培南的亚抑制浓度一起使用时,表现出对浮游细菌细胞的协同作用,并显示出抑制和根除生物膜的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of bacteriophages PAA and PAM and evaluation of their antibiotic synergy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAZMYU isolated from urine sample.

Antibiotic resistance has been attributed to both the overuse of current drugs and the lack of availability of newer drugs due to stringent regulatory requirements and reduced commercial incentives. Novel alternative therapies, such as phage treatments, have demonstrated promising outcomes in clinical trials, indicating their potential for treating recalcitrant infections in the future. The objective of this study was to isolate and characterize bacteriophages against a uropathogenic strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of combining sub-inhibitory concentrations of cefepime and meropenem with the isolated bacteriophages. The isolated phages were designated PAA and PAM, both exhibiting icosahedral heads and long non-contractile tails. Both phages maintained stability within Limited pH and temperature ranges. The optimal adsorption times for PAA and PAM were 10 and 20 min, respectively, with PAA demonstrating a short latent time and burst size of 47, while PAM exhibited a burst size of 83. The optimal multiplicity of infection for PAA was 1, and for PAM was 0.1. PAA demonstrated efficacy against 40% of the tested strains of P. aeruginosa, while PAM was effective against 64%. Both phages remained stable at subinhibitory concentrations of cefepime and meropenem and when employed with sub-inhibitory concentrations of cefepime and meropenem, exhibited synergistic effects against planktonic bacterial cells and demonstrated efficacy in both biofilm inhibition and eradication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Microbiology
BMC Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Microbiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on analytical and functional studies of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and small parasites, as well as host and therapeutic responses to them and their interaction with the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信