膜过滤法直接鉴定阳性血培养瓶微生物及药敏试验。

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Tsui-Ping Liu, Hui-Fang Wu, Pai-Ling Chang
{"title":"膜过滤法直接鉴定阳性血培养瓶微生物及药敏试验。","authors":"Tsui-Ping Liu, Hui-Fang Wu, Pai-Ling Chang","doi":"10.1186/s12866-025-04337-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Rapid and accurate pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) are crucial for timely and effective treatment. Conventional blood culture (BC) workflows are time-consuming, typically requiring 18-48 h. Although integrating matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) with direct AST protocols is promising, certain limitations remain. Therefore, we aimed to establish a faster and more reliable method for the direct identification and AST of microorganisms from positive BC bottles using a membrane filtration-based protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The membrane filtration-based method achieved an overall identification success rate of 76.5%. Rates were highest for Gram-negative bacteria (88.1%), followed by anaerobes (80.0%), Gram-positive cocci (70.2%), and Gram-positive bacilli (43.8%). Yeast identification was unsuccessful. AST results showed strong concordance with those from the conventional method, with essential agreement (EA) exceeding 95% across all groups. For Gram-negative bacteria, EA was 98% and categorical agreement (CA) was 95.4%, with 3.6%, 0.5%, and 0.5% minor, major, and very major errors, respectively. EA and CA were 96.1% and 94.2% for Gram-positive cocci, and 95.5% and 93.4% for Streptococcus spp.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The membrane filtration-based method, effective for Gram-negative bacteria, reduced turnaround time by 10-12 h compared to conventional workflows. Further optimization can improve accuracy for Gram-positive bacteria and yeast, offering a promising, streamlined workflow to enhance BSI diagnostics and guide targeted antimicrobial therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9233,"journal":{"name":"BMC Microbiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"606"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of microorganisms from positive blood culture bottles using a membrane filtration method.\",\"authors\":\"Tsui-Ping Liu, Hui-Fang Wu, Pai-Ling Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12866-025-04337-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Rapid and accurate pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) are crucial for timely and effective treatment. Conventional blood culture (BC) workflows are time-consuming, typically requiring 18-48 h. Although integrating matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) with direct AST protocols is promising, certain limitations remain. Therefore, we aimed to establish a faster and more reliable method for the direct identification and AST of microorganisms from positive BC bottles using a membrane filtration-based protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The membrane filtration-based method achieved an overall identification success rate of 76.5%. Rates were highest for Gram-negative bacteria (88.1%), followed by anaerobes (80.0%), Gram-positive cocci (70.2%), and Gram-positive bacilli (43.8%). Yeast identification was unsuccessful. AST results showed strong concordance with those from the conventional method, with essential agreement (EA) exceeding 95% across all groups. For Gram-negative bacteria, EA was 98% and categorical agreement (CA) was 95.4%, with 3.6%, 0.5%, and 0.5% minor, major, and very major errors, respectively. EA and CA were 96.1% and 94.2% for Gram-positive cocci, and 95.5% and 93.4% for Streptococcus spp.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The membrane filtration-based method, effective for Gram-negative bacteria, reduced turnaround time by 10-12 h compared to conventional workflows. Further optimization can improve accuracy for Gram-positive bacteria and yeast, offering a promising, streamlined workflow to enhance BSI diagnostics and guide targeted antimicrobial therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492815/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-04337-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-04337-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血流感染(bsi)是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因。快速准确的病原菌鉴定和药敏试验是及时有效治疗的关键。传统的血培养(BC)工作流程非常耗时,通常需要18-48小时。尽管将基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)与直接AST协议相结合很有希望,但仍存在一定的局限性。因此,我们的目的是建立一种更快、更可靠的方法,使用基于膜过滤的方法直接鉴定和AST从阳性BC瓶中提取微生物。结果:基于膜过滤的方法总体鉴定成功率为76.5%。革兰氏阴性菌感染率最高(88.1%),其次为厌氧菌(80.0%)、革兰氏阳性球菌(70.2%)和革兰氏阳性杆菌(43.8%)。酵母鉴定不成功。AST结果与常规方法的结果有很强的一致性,基本一致性(EA)在所有组中都超过95%。革兰氏阴性菌的EA为98%,CA为95.4%,分别有3.6%、0.5%和0.5%的轻微、严重和非常严重的错误。革兰氏阳性球菌的EA和CA分别为96.1%和94.2%,链球菌的EA和CA分别为95.5%和93.4%。结论:基于膜过滤的方法对革兰氏阴性菌有效,比常规工作流程缩短了10 ~ 12 h的周转时间。进一步的优化可以提高革兰氏阳性细菌和酵母的准确性,提供一个有前途的、简化的工作流程,以增强BSI诊断和指导靶向抗菌治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Direct identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of microorganisms from positive blood culture bottles using a membrane filtration method.

Background: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Rapid and accurate pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) are crucial for timely and effective treatment. Conventional blood culture (BC) workflows are time-consuming, typically requiring 18-48 h. Although integrating matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) with direct AST protocols is promising, certain limitations remain. Therefore, we aimed to establish a faster and more reliable method for the direct identification and AST of microorganisms from positive BC bottles using a membrane filtration-based protocol.

Results: The membrane filtration-based method achieved an overall identification success rate of 76.5%. Rates were highest for Gram-negative bacteria (88.1%), followed by anaerobes (80.0%), Gram-positive cocci (70.2%), and Gram-positive bacilli (43.8%). Yeast identification was unsuccessful. AST results showed strong concordance with those from the conventional method, with essential agreement (EA) exceeding 95% across all groups. For Gram-negative bacteria, EA was 98% and categorical agreement (CA) was 95.4%, with 3.6%, 0.5%, and 0.5% minor, major, and very major errors, respectively. EA and CA were 96.1% and 94.2% for Gram-positive cocci, and 95.5% and 93.4% for Streptococcus spp.

Conclusions: The membrane filtration-based method, effective for Gram-negative bacteria, reduced turnaround time by 10-12 h compared to conventional workflows. Further optimization can improve accuracy for Gram-positive bacteria and yeast, offering a promising, streamlined workflow to enhance BSI diagnostics and guide targeted antimicrobial therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Microbiology
BMC Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Microbiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on analytical and functional studies of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and small parasites, as well as host and therapeutic responses to them and their interaction with the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信