偶发性便秘:罗马iv全球流行病学研究的患病率和影响。

IF 12 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annelies Verheyden, Jóhann P Hreinsson, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, Douglas Drossman, Magnus Simrén, Ami D Sperber, Olafur S Palsson, Jan Tack
{"title":"偶发性便秘:罗马iv全球流行病学研究的患病率和影响。","authors":"Annelies Verheyden, Jóhann P Hreinsson, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, Douglas Drossman, Magnus Simrén, Ami D Sperber, Olafur S Palsson, Jan Tack","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2025.09.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Recently, a Rome working group defined individuals with occasional constipation (OC). We used the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study database to study the global prevalence of OC, its co-morbidities, quality of life (QoL) impact, and healthcare utilization, compared to subjects without constipation symptoms (No Constipation), or with functional constipation (FC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>54127 adults (26578 females; mean age 43.7) from 26 countries completed an internet survey including Rome IV diagnoses, demographics, psychosocial data, QoL, and medical history. OC was defined as ≥1/5 constipation symptoms without meeting FC criteria, associated with concerns about bowel function. Respondents with other Rome IV bowel disorders or relevant organic disease were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The global prevalence of Rome-defined OC was 7.4%, ranging from 4.3% in the Middle East to 15.8% in Eastern Europe. OC was predominant in females (46.1%) compared to No Constipation (40.2%), but not compared to FC (63.9%). Compared to No Constipation, OC subjects had higher odds of fulfilling Rome IV criteria for upper gastrointestinal disorders, but lower odds in comparison to those with FC. OC was associated with significantly lower QoL (physical 14.5 vs. 16.1 and mental 13.5 vs. 15.3), and a higher prevalence of anxiety (12.3% vs. 5.6%) and depression (12.0% vs. 5.6%) compared to No Constipation. Compared to subjects with FC, OC subjects were more concerned about their bowel function. Healthcare consumption (doctor visits and medication usage) was higher in OC versus No Constipation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rome-defined OC is common on a global scale, associated with psychological distress, reduced QoL, other Rome IV diagnoses, and high healthcare utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OCCASIONAL CONSTIPATION: PREVALENCE AND IMPACT IN THE ROME IV GLOBAL EPIDEMIOLOGY STUDY.\",\"authors\":\"Annelies Verheyden, Jóhann P Hreinsson, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, Douglas Drossman, Magnus Simrén, Ami D Sperber, Olafur S Palsson, Jan Tack\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cgh.2025.09.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Recently, a Rome working group defined individuals with occasional constipation (OC). We used the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study database to study the global prevalence of OC, its co-morbidities, quality of life (QoL) impact, and healthcare utilization, compared to subjects without constipation symptoms (No Constipation), or with functional constipation (FC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>54127 adults (26578 females; mean age 43.7) from 26 countries completed an internet survey including Rome IV diagnoses, demographics, psychosocial data, QoL, and medical history. OC was defined as ≥1/5 constipation symptoms without meeting FC criteria, associated with concerns about bowel function. Respondents with other Rome IV bowel disorders or relevant organic disease were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The global prevalence of Rome-defined OC was 7.4%, ranging from 4.3% in the Middle East to 15.8% in Eastern Europe. OC was predominant in females (46.1%) compared to No Constipation (40.2%), but not compared to FC (63.9%). Compared to No Constipation, OC subjects had higher odds of fulfilling Rome IV criteria for upper gastrointestinal disorders, but lower odds in comparison to those with FC. OC was associated with significantly lower QoL (physical 14.5 vs. 16.1 and mental 13.5 vs. 15.3), and a higher prevalence of anxiety (12.3% vs. 5.6%) and depression (12.0% vs. 5.6%) compared to No Constipation. Compared to subjects with FC, OC subjects were more concerned about their bowel function. Healthcare consumption (doctor visits and medication usage) was higher in OC versus No Constipation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rome-defined OC is common on a global scale, associated with psychological distress, reduced QoL, other Rome IV diagnoses, and high healthcare utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.09.027\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.09.027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:最近,一个罗马工作组定义了偶尔便秘(OC)的个体。我们使用罗马基金会全球流行病学研究数据库来研究与没有便秘症状(No便秘)或功能性便秘(FC)的受试者相比,全球OC患病率、其合并症、生活质量(QoL)影响和医疗保健利用。方法:来自26个国家的54127名成年人(26578名女性,平均年龄43.7岁)完成了一项网络调查,包括罗马IV诊断、人口统计学、社会心理数据、生活质量和病史。OC定义为便秘症状≥1/5,但不符合FC标准,并伴有肠功能担忧。患有其他罗马IV型肠道疾病或相关器质性疾病的应答者被排除在外。结果:罗马定义的OC的全球患病率为7.4%,从中东的4.3%到东欧的15.8%不等。与未便秘(40.2%)相比,OC在女性中占主导地位(46.1%),但与FC(63.9%)相比则不然。与无便秘患者相比,OC患者满足上消化道疾病Rome IV标准的几率更高,但与FC患者相比,发生率较低。与无便秘患者相比,慢性便秘患者的生活质量显著降低(身体14.5比16.1,精神13.5比15.3),焦虑(12.3%比5.6%)和抑郁(12.0%比5.6%)的患病率更高。与FC患者相比,OC患者更关心他们的肠道功能。与没有便秘的人相比,便秘组的医疗保健消费(医生就诊和药物使用)更高。结论:罗马定义的OC在全球范围内很常见,与心理困扰、生活质量降低、其他罗马IV诊断和高医疗利用率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OCCASIONAL CONSTIPATION: PREVALENCE AND IMPACT IN THE ROME IV GLOBAL EPIDEMIOLOGY STUDY.

Background & aims: Recently, a Rome working group defined individuals with occasional constipation (OC). We used the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study database to study the global prevalence of OC, its co-morbidities, quality of life (QoL) impact, and healthcare utilization, compared to subjects without constipation symptoms (No Constipation), or with functional constipation (FC).

Methods: 54127 adults (26578 females; mean age 43.7) from 26 countries completed an internet survey including Rome IV diagnoses, demographics, psychosocial data, QoL, and medical history. OC was defined as ≥1/5 constipation symptoms without meeting FC criteria, associated with concerns about bowel function. Respondents with other Rome IV bowel disorders or relevant organic disease were excluded.

Results: The global prevalence of Rome-defined OC was 7.4%, ranging from 4.3% in the Middle East to 15.8% in Eastern Europe. OC was predominant in females (46.1%) compared to No Constipation (40.2%), but not compared to FC (63.9%). Compared to No Constipation, OC subjects had higher odds of fulfilling Rome IV criteria for upper gastrointestinal disorders, but lower odds in comparison to those with FC. OC was associated with significantly lower QoL (physical 14.5 vs. 16.1 and mental 13.5 vs. 15.3), and a higher prevalence of anxiety (12.3% vs. 5.6%) and depression (12.0% vs. 5.6%) compared to No Constipation. Compared to subjects with FC, OC subjects were more concerned about their bowel function. Healthcare consumption (doctor visits and medication usage) was higher in OC versus No Constipation.

Conclusion: Rome-defined OC is common on a global scale, associated with psychological distress, reduced QoL, other Rome IV diagnoses, and high healthcare utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信