Annelies Verheyden, Jóhann P Hreinsson, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, Douglas Drossman, Magnus Simrén, Ami D Sperber, Olafur S Palsson, Jan Tack
{"title":"偶发性便秘:罗马iv全球流行病学研究的患病率和影响。","authors":"Annelies Verheyden, Jóhann P Hreinsson, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, Douglas Drossman, Magnus Simrén, Ami D Sperber, Olafur S Palsson, Jan Tack","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2025.09.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Recently, a Rome working group defined individuals with occasional constipation (OC). We used the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study database to study the global prevalence of OC, its co-morbidities, quality of life (QoL) impact, and healthcare utilization, compared to subjects without constipation symptoms (No Constipation), or with functional constipation (FC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>54127 adults (26578 females; mean age 43.7) from 26 countries completed an internet survey including Rome IV diagnoses, demographics, psychosocial data, QoL, and medical history. OC was defined as ≥1/5 constipation symptoms without meeting FC criteria, associated with concerns about bowel function. Respondents with other Rome IV bowel disorders or relevant organic disease were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The global prevalence of Rome-defined OC was 7.4%, ranging from 4.3% in the Middle East to 15.8% in Eastern Europe. OC was predominant in females (46.1%) compared to No Constipation (40.2%), but not compared to FC (63.9%). Compared to No Constipation, OC subjects had higher odds of fulfilling Rome IV criteria for upper gastrointestinal disorders, but lower odds in comparison to those with FC. OC was associated with significantly lower QoL (physical 14.5 vs. 16.1 and mental 13.5 vs. 15.3), and a higher prevalence of anxiety (12.3% vs. 5.6%) and depression (12.0% vs. 5.6%) compared to No Constipation. Compared to subjects with FC, OC subjects were more concerned about their bowel function. Healthcare consumption (doctor visits and medication usage) was higher in OC versus No Constipation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rome-defined OC is common on a global scale, associated with psychological distress, reduced QoL, other Rome IV diagnoses, and high healthcare utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OCCASIONAL CONSTIPATION: PREVALENCE AND IMPACT IN THE ROME IV GLOBAL EPIDEMIOLOGY STUDY.\",\"authors\":\"Annelies Verheyden, Jóhann P Hreinsson, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, Douglas Drossman, Magnus Simrén, Ami D Sperber, Olafur S Palsson, Jan Tack\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cgh.2025.09.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Recently, a Rome working group defined individuals with occasional constipation (OC). We used the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study database to study the global prevalence of OC, its co-morbidities, quality of life (QoL) impact, and healthcare utilization, compared to subjects without constipation symptoms (No Constipation), or with functional constipation (FC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>54127 adults (26578 females; mean age 43.7) from 26 countries completed an internet survey including Rome IV diagnoses, demographics, psychosocial data, QoL, and medical history. OC was defined as ≥1/5 constipation symptoms without meeting FC criteria, associated with concerns about bowel function. Respondents with other Rome IV bowel disorders or relevant organic disease were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The global prevalence of Rome-defined OC was 7.4%, ranging from 4.3% in the Middle East to 15.8% in Eastern Europe. OC was predominant in females (46.1%) compared to No Constipation (40.2%), but not compared to FC (63.9%). Compared to No Constipation, OC subjects had higher odds of fulfilling Rome IV criteria for upper gastrointestinal disorders, but lower odds in comparison to those with FC. OC was associated with significantly lower QoL (physical 14.5 vs. 16.1 and mental 13.5 vs. 15.3), and a higher prevalence of anxiety (12.3% vs. 5.6%) and depression (12.0% vs. 5.6%) compared to No Constipation. Compared to subjects with FC, OC subjects were more concerned about their bowel function. Healthcare consumption (doctor visits and medication usage) was higher in OC versus No Constipation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rome-defined OC is common on a global scale, associated with psychological distress, reduced QoL, other Rome IV diagnoses, and high healthcare utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.09.027\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.09.027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
OCCASIONAL CONSTIPATION: PREVALENCE AND IMPACT IN THE ROME IV GLOBAL EPIDEMIOLOGY STUDY.
Background & aims: Recently, a Rome working group defined individuals with occasional constipation (OC). We used the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study database to study the global prevalence of OC, its co-morbidities, quality of life (QoL) impact, and healthcare utilization, compared to subjects without constipation symptoms (No Constipation), or with functional constipation (FC).
Methods: 54127 adults (26578 females; mean age 43.7) from 26 countries completed an internet survey including Rome IV diagnoses, demographics, psychosocial data, QoL, and medical history. OC was defined as ≥1/5 constipation symptoms without meeting FC criteria, associated with concerns about bowel function. Respondents with other Rome IV bowel disorders or relevant organic disease were excluded.
Results: The global prevalence of Rome-defined OC was 7.4%, ranging from 4.3% in the Middle East to 15.8% in Eastern Europe. OC was predominant in females (46.1%) compared to No Constipation (40.2%), but not compared to FC (63.9%). Compared to No Constipation, OC subjects had higher odds of fulfilling Rome IV criteria for upper gastrointestinal disorders, but lower odds in comparison to those with FC. OC was associated with significantly lower QoL (physical 14.5 vs. 16.1 and mental 13.5 vs. 15.3), and a higher prevalence of anxiety (12.3% vs. 5.6%) and depression (12.0% vs. 5.6%) compared to No Constipation. Compared to subjects with FC, OC subjects were more concerned about their bowel function. Healthcare consumption (doctor visits and medication usage) was higher in OC versus No Constipation.
Conclusion: Rome-defined OC is common on a global scale, associated with psychological distress, reduced QoL, other Rome IV diagnoses, and high healthcare utilization.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion.
As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.