2020年3月至2022年5月,德国COVID-19发病率和病死率方面不断变化的社会经济不平等:一项生态学研究。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sarah C Kramer, Laura Andrea Barrero Guevara, Matthias An der Heiden, Benjamin Wachtler, Matthieu Domenech de Cellès
{"title":"2020年3月至2022年5月,德国COVID-19发病率和病死率方面不断变化的社会经济不平等:一项生态学研究。","authors":"Sarah C Kramer, Laura Andrea Barrero Guevara, Matthias An der Heiden, Benjamin Wachtler, Matthieu Domenech de Cellès","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-24625-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomic disparities in COVID-19 burden were widely observed during the pandemic's early waves, including in Germany, but studies on whether these inequalities have persisted or changed as the pandemic progressed are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an ecological study design to assess the relationship between a range of demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare-related predictors and COVID-19 impact in Germany. Specifically, we fit generalized additive models to cumulative, district-level (n = 400) COVID-19 incidence and case fatality rates (CFRs) for each of the first five pandemic waves, which covered the period from March 2020 through May 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find that associations between socioeconomic deprivation and COVID-19 impact evolved over time. Specifically, districts with higher levels of deprivation experienced lower incidence initially, but higher incidence beginning in the second half of wave 1 and persisting through wave 3. Meanwhile, more deprived districts experienced higher CFRs initially as well as during waves 3 through 5, but lower CFRs during the second half of wave 1. Finally, during the first four waves, we find that district-level CFRs scaled superlinearly with incidence, suggesting that the risk of death increased with incidence. This relationship was particularly strong during the first pandemic wave.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The association between socioeconomic position and COVID-19 impact in Germany has been complex, with patterns changing in intensity and direction over time. Continued monitoring of socioeconomic inequalities in COVID-19 impact, in particular at the individual level, is needed to better understand if and how inequalities continue to persist. Such monitoring will be instrumental in informing more equitable control strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"3289"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence and case fatality rates of COVID-19 in Germany, March 2020 through May 2022: an ecological study.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah C Kramer, Laura Andrea Barrero Guevara, Matthias An der Heiden, Benjamin Wachtler, Matthieu Domenech de Cellès\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12889-025-24625-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomic disparities in COVID-19 burden were widely observed during the pandemic's early waves, including in Germany, but studies on whether these inequalities have persisted or changed as the pandemic progressed are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an ecological study design to assess the relationship between a range of demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare-related predictors and COVID-19 impact in Germany. Specifically, we fit generalized additive models to cumulative, district-level (n = 400) COVID-19 incidence and case fatality rates (CFRs) for each of the first five pandemic waves, which covered the period from March 2020 through May 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find that associations between socioeconomic deprivation and COVID-19 impact evolved over time. Specifically, districts with higher levels of deprivation experienced lower incidence initially, but higher incidence beginning in the second half of wave 1 and persisting through wave 3. Meanwhile, more deprived districts experienced higher CFRs initially as well as during waves 3 through 5, but lower CFRs during the second half of wave 1. Finally, during the first four waves, we find that district-level CFRs scaled superlinearly with incidence, suggesting that the risk of death increased with incidence. This relationship was particularly strong during the first pandemic wave.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The association between socioeconomic position and COVID-19 impact in Germany has been complex, with patterns changing in intensity and direction over time. Continued monitoring of socioeconomic inequalities in COVID-19 impact, in particular at the individual level, is needed to better understand if and how inequalities continue to persist. Such monitoring will be instrumental in informing more equitable control strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"3289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24625-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24625-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在大流行的早期阶段,包括在德国,人们广泛观察到COVID-19负担中的社会经济差异,但缺乏关于这些不平等是否随着大流行的发展而持续存在或发生变化的研究。方法:我们采用生态学研究设计来评估德国一系列人口、社会经济和卫生保健相关预测因素与COVID-19影响之间的关系。具体而言,我们将广义相加模型拟合到前五次大流行浪潮(涵盖2020年3月至2022年5月)中每一次累积的区级(n = 400) COVID-19发病率和病死率(CFRs)。结果:我们发现社会经济剥夺与COVID-19影响之间的关联随着时间的推移而演变。具体来说,贫困程度较高的地区最初的发病率较低,但从第一波的后半段开始发病率较高,并持续到第三波。与此同时,更贫困的地区在最初以及第3波到第5波期间经历了更高的cfr,但在第1波后半段经历了更低的cfr。最后,在前4波中,我们发现区级CFRs与发病率呈超线性关系,表明死亡风险随着发病率的增加而增加。这种关系在第一波大流行期间尤为强烈。结论:在德国,社会经济地位与COVID-19影响之间的关系是复杂的,随着时间的推移,其模式在强度和方向上都在变化。需要继续监测2019冠状病毒病对社会经济不平等的影响,特别是在个人层面,以更好地了解不平等是否以及如何继续存在。这种监测将有助于为更公平的控制战略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changing socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence and case fatality rates of COVID-19 in Germany, March 2020 through May 2022: an ecological study.

Background: Socioeconomic disparities in COVID-19 burden were widely observed during the pandemic's early waves, including in Germany, but studies on whether these inequalities have persisted or changed as the pandemic progressed are lacking.

Methods: We used an ecological study design to assess the relationship between a range of demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare-related predictors and COVID-19 impact in Germany. Specifically, we fit generalized additive models to cumulative, district-level (n = 400) COVID-19 incidence and case fatality rates (CFRs) for each of the first five pandemic waves, which covered the period from March 2020 through May 2022.

Results: We find that associations between socioeconomic deprivation and COVID-19 impact evolved over time. Specifically, districts with higher levels of deprivation experienced lower incidence initially, but higher incidence beginning in the second half of wave 1 and persisting through wave 3. Meanwhile, more deprived districts experienced higher CFRs initially as well as during waves 3 through 5, but lower CFRs during the second half of wave 1. Finally, during the first four waves, we find that district-level CFRs scaled superlinearly with incidence, suggesting that the risk of death increased with incidence. This relationship was particularly strong during the first pandemic wave.

Conclusions: The association between socioeconomic position and COVID-19 impact in Germany has been complex, with patterns changing in intensity and direction over time. Continued monitoring of socioeconomic inequalities in COVID-19 impact, in particular at the individual level, is needed to better understand if and how inequalities continue to persist. Such monitoring will be instrumental in informing more equitable control strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信