Jill Marie Ferry, Joaquin Escribano, Mariona Gispert-LLauradó, Berthold Koletzko, Veit Grote
{"title":"切点法对幼儿身体活动分类和久坐行为的影响。","authors":"Jill Marie Ferry, Joaquin Escribano, Mariona Gispert-LLauradó, Berthold Koletzko, Veit Grote","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-24636-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Classification of physical activity (PA) depends on the cut-point method used to allocate PA counts from accelerometer measurements. This study investigates how three validated cut-point methods affect the time spent in various levels of PA and sedentary behaviour (SB), and how they impact toddlers estimated adherence to PA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PA was assessed using an ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer in a cohort of 653 two-year-old children participating in the Toddler Milk Intervention study. Children wearing the ActiGraph for at least four days, with a minimum of six hours wear-time per day, were included. Time spent in SB and different activity levels were estimated according to three cut-point methods and were standardized to individual mean wear-time. We used one cut-point method based on the vertical axis (VA) (Trost VA), with an epoch length of 15 s and two cut-point methods based on either the VA (Costa VA) or on the vector magnitude (VM) (Costa VM) with an epoch length of five seconds. Estimates of SB and PA for each method were compared with repeated measures ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time toddlers spent in PA was significantly different depending on the cut-point methods. Costa VM classified on average 62 min (95% CI 61, 64] more per day as SB and 57 min (95% CI -58, -56] less per day as LPA compared to Trost VA (both p < 0.0001). For MVPA, the mean difference between Costa VA and Trost VA was 6.8 min (95% CI -7, -6; p < 0.0001). Concurrently, the proportion of children meeting the WHO recommendation of 180 min of total PA differed between cut-point methods, with 86% according to Costa VM and 97% according to Trost VA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The time toddlers engage in different intensities of PA is significantly determined by the selection of cut-point method. Notably, the use of a different cut-point method leads up to a 10% difference in the estimated time spent in LPA and SB, but only a 1% difference of moderate-vigorous PA. These differences change the estimated adherence to recommendations. Future research is needed to standardize the data processing methods for better comparability between studies analysing toddlers' PA.</p><p><strong>Registry: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, TRN: NCT02907502, Registration Date: 31 August 2016.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"3290"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of cut-point methods on classification of physical activity and sedentary behaviour of toddlers.\",\"authors\":\"Jill Marie Ferry, Joaquin Escribano, Mariona Gispert-LLauradó, Berthold Koletzko, Veit Grote\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12889-025-24636-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Classification of physical activity (PA) depends on the cut-point method used to allocate PA counts from accelerometer measurements. This study investigates how three validated cut-point methods affect the time spent in various levels of PA and sedentary behaviour (SB), and how they impact toddlers estimated adherence to PA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PA was assessed using an ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer in a cohort of 653 two-year-old children participating in the Toddler Milk Intervention study. Children wearing the ActiGraph for at least four days, with a minimum of six hours wear-time per day, were included. Time spent in SB and different activity levels were estimated according to three cut-point methods and were standardized to individual mean wear-time. We used one cut-point method based on the vertical axis (VA) (Trost VA), with an epoch length of 15 s and two cut-point methods based on either the VA (Costa VA) or on the vector magnitude (VM) (Costa VM) with an epoch length of five seconds. Estimates of SB and PA for each method were compared with repeated measures ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time toddlers spent in PA was significantly different depending on the cut-point methods. Costa VM classified on average 62 min (95% CI 61, 64] more per day as SB and 57 min (95% CI -58, -56] less per day as LPA compared to Trost VA (both p < 0.0001). For MVPA, the mean difference between Costa VA and Trost VA was 6.8 min (95% CI -7, -6; p < 0.0001). Concurrently, the proportion of children meeting the WHO recommendation of 180 min of total PA differed between cut-point methods, with 86% according to Costa VM and 97% according to Trost VA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The time toddlers engage in different intensities of PA is significantly determined by the selection of cut-point method. Notably, the use of a different cut-point method leads up to a 10% difference in the estimated time spent in LPA and SB, but only a 1% difference of moderate-vigorous PA. These differences change the estimated adherence to recommendations. Future research is needed to standardize the data processing methods for better comparability between studies analysing toddlers' PA.</p><p><strong>Registry: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, TRN: NCT02907502, Registration Date: 31 August 2016.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"3290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24636-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24636-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:体力活动(PA)的分类取决于用于分配加速度计测量的PA计数的切点方法。本研究调查了三种有效的切割点方法如何影响在不同水平的PA和久坐行为(SB)中花费的时间,以及它们如何影响幼儿对PA指导方针的估计依从性。方法:采用ActiGraph wGT3X-BT加速计对653名参加幼儿母乳干预研究的两岁儿童进行PA评估。儿童佩戴ActiGraph至少4天,每天至少佩戴6小时。根据三种切点方法估计在SB中花费的时间和不同的活动水平,并标准化为个人平均磨损时间。我们使用了一种基于垂直轴(VA) (Trost VA)的切点方法,其历元长度为15 s,以及两种基于垂直轴(Costa VA)或矢量幅度(VM) (Costa VM)的切点方法,其历元长度为5秒。用重复测量方差分析比较每种方法的SB和PA估计值。结果:不同切割点的幼儿在PA上花费的时间有显著差异。与Trost VA相比,Costa VM每天将SB分类平均多62分钟(95% CI 61,64),将LPA分类平均少57分钟(95% CI -58, -56)(两者均为p)结论:幼儿参与不同强度PA的时间显著取决于切割点法的选择。值得注意的是,使用不同的切点方法导致LPA和SB的估计时间相差10%,但中等强度PA的估计时间仅相差1%。这些差异改变了对建议依从性的估计。未来的研究需要标准化数据处理方法,以便更好地在分析幼儿PA的研究之间进行比较。注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, TRN: NCT02907502,注册日期:2016年8月31日。
Impact of cut-point methods on classification of physical activity and sedentary behaviour of toddlers.
Background: Classification of physical activity (PA) depends on the cut-point method used to allocate PA counts from accelerometer measurements. This study investigates how three validated cut-point methods affect the time spent in various levels of PA and sedentary behaviour (SB), and how they impact toddlers estimated adherence to PA guidelines.
Methods: PA was assessed using an ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer in a cohort of 653 two-year-old children participating in the Toddler Milk Intervention study. Children wearing the ActiGraph for at least four days, with a minimum of six hours wear-time per day, were included. Time spent in SB and different activity levels were estimated according to three cut-point methods and were standardized to individual mean wear-time. We used one cut-point method based on the vertical axis (VA) (Trost VA), with an epoch length of 15 s and two cut-point methods based on either the VA (Costa VA) or on the vector magnitude (VM) (Costa VM) with an epoch length of five seconds. Estimates of SB and PA for each method were compared with repeated measures ANOVA.
Results: The time toddlers spent in PA was significantly different depending on the cut-point methods. Costa VM classified on average 62 min (95% CI 61, 64] more per day as SB and 57 min (95% CI -58, -56] less per day as LPA compared to Trost VA (both p < 0.0001). For MVPA, the mean difference between Costa VA and Trost VA was 6.8 min (95% CI -7, -6; p < 0.0001). Concurrently, the proportion of children meeting the WHO recommendation of 180 min of total PA differed between cut-point methods, with 86% according to Costa VM and 97% according to Trost VA.
Conclusions: The time toddlers engage in different intensities of PA is significantly determined by the selection of cut-point method. Notably, the use of a different cut-point method leads up to a 10% difference in the estimated time spent in LPA and SB, but only a 1% difference of moderate-vigorous PA. These differences change the estimated adherence to recommendations. Future research is needed to standardize the data processing methods for better comparability between studies analysing toddlers' PA.
Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, TRN: NCT02907502, Registration Date: 31 August 2016.
期刊介绍:
BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.