二次益生菌混合物对绵羊瘤胃发酵、营养物质降解率和甲烷排放的影响

IF 3.7 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Ali S A Saleem, Khaled M Al-Marakby, Mohamed Y Elaref, Sabry M Bassiony, Amera A Helal, Usama M Abdel-Monem, Sameh A Abdelnour
{"title":"二次益生菌混合物对绵羊瘤胃发酵、营养物质降解率和甲烷排放的影响","authors":"Ali S A Saleem, Khaled M Al-Marakby, Mohamed Y Elaref, Sabry M Bassiony, Amera A Helal, Usama M Abdel-Monem, Sameh A Abdelnour","doi":"10.1186/s13568-025-01955-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The considerable contribution of ruminant livestock to methane emissions has become a major global concern in recent years. Although dietary approaches for reducing ruminant methane emissions have been explored, the sustainable potential of probiotics to influence rumen function and lower methane production has increasingly attracted research attention. While previous studies have focused on single or dual-strain probiotics, this study is among the first to evaluate the synergistic effects of quadric-strain formulations. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of multi-strain probiotic blends, each at two distinct concentrations on rumen fermentation, nutrient degradability, and methane emission in sheep using an in vitro gas production technique following a completely randomized design. The basal diet with no probiotic supplements served as a control, while the supplemented bacterial combinations were Bacillus licheniformis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. bulgaricus, and Bifidobacterium bifidum (ABLB; at a ratio of 1:1:1:1) at levels of 2 × 10<sup>9</sup> (ABLB2) and 4 × 10<sup>9</sup> (ABLB4) CFU/g of feed, and Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus plantarum, Bacillus subtilis plus Bifidobacterium bifidum (CPSB; at a ratio of 1:1:1:1) at levels of 2 × 10<sup>9</sup> (CPSB2) and 4 × 10<sup>9</sup> (CPSB4) CFU/g of feed. Probiotic supplementation significantly improved in vitro dry matter and fiber degradability (IVDMD and IVCFD), with the most effective results observed in ABLB treatments. These blends also reduced methane production and ammonia-N concentrations, while increasing total volatile fatty acids (TVFA), indicating more efficient fermentation. Protozoa counts were notably lower in treated groups, supporting the role of probiotics in mitigating methane via microbial modulation (P < 0.01). Probiotic supplementation did not affect the values of pH (P > 0.05). Predictive values for metabolizable energy (ME), net energy for lactation (NEL), and organic matter digestibility (OMD) were improved across treatments. These findings highlight the potential of targeted probiotic formulations to enhance rumen efficiency and reduce environmental emissions in ruminant systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":7537,"journal":{"name":"AMB Express","volume":"15 1","pages":"144"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of quadric probiotic blends on rumen fermentation, nutrient degradability, and methane emission in sheep: an in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Ali S A Saleem, Khaled M Al-Marakby, Mohamed Y Elaref, Sabry M Bassiony, Amera A Helal, Usama M Abdel-Monem, Sameh A Abdelnour\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13568-025-01955-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The considerable contribution of ruminant livestock to methane emissions has become a major global concern in recent years. Although dietary approaches for reducing ruminant methane emissions have been explored, the sustainable potential of probiotics to influence rumen function and lower methane production has increasingly attracted research attention. While previous studies have focused on single or dual-strain probiotics, this study is among the first to evaluate the synergistic effects of quadric-strain formulations. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of multi-strain probiotic blends, each at two distinct concentrations on rumen fermentation, nutrient degradability, and methane emission in sheep using an in vitro gas production technique following a completely randomized design. The basal diet with no probiotic supplements served as a control, while the supplemented bacterial combinations were Bacillus licheniformis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. bulgaricus, and Bifidobacterium bifidum (ABLB; at a ratio of 1:1:1:1) at levels of 2 × 10<sup>9</sup> (ABLB2) and 4 × 10<sup>9</sup> (ABLB4) CFU/g of feed, and Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus plantarum, Bacillus subtilis plus Bifidobacterium bifidum (CPSB; at a ratio of 1:1:1:1) at levels of 2 × 10<sup>9</sup> (CPSB2) and 4 × 10<sup>9</sup> (CPSB4) CFU/g of feed. Probiotic supplementation significantly improved in vitro dry matter and fiber degradability (IVDMD and IVCFD), with the most effective results observed in ABLB treatments. These blends also reduced methane production and ammonia-N concentrations, while increasing total volatile fatty acids (TVFA), indicating more efficient fermentation. Protozoa counts were notably lower in treated groups, supporting the role of probiotics in mitigating methane via microbial modulation (P < 0.01). Probiotic supplementation did not affect the values of pH (P > 0.05). Predictive values for metabolizable energy (ME), net energy for lactation (NEL), and organic matter digestibility (OMD) were improved across treatments. These findings highlight the potential of targeted probiotic formulations to enhance rumen efficiency and reduce environmental emissions in ruminant systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMB Express\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494527/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMB Express\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-025-01955-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMB Express","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-025-01955-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,反刍牲畜对甲烷排放的巨大贡献已成为全球关注的主要问题。虽然已经探索了减少反刍动物甲烷排放的饮食方法,但益生菌影响瘤胃功能和降低甲烷产量的可持续潜力越来越受到研究的关注。虽然以前的研究主要集中在单菌株或双菌株益生菌上,但这项研究是首次评估二次菌株制剂的协同效应。因此,本研究旨在通过完全随机设计的体外产气技术,评估两种不同浓度的多菌株益生菌混合物对绵羊瘤胃发酵、营养物质降解率和甲烷排放的影响。基底饮食没有益生菌补充剂作为控制,而补充细菌组合地衣芽孢杆菌,嗜酸乳杆菌,l .发酵剂,保加利亚和双歧杆菌bifidum (ABLB; 1:1:1:1的比率)水平的2×109 (ABLB2)和4×109 (ABLB4) CFU / g的饲料,干酪乳杆菌,乳杆菌,枯草芽孢杆菌+双歧杆菌bifidum (CPSB; 1:1:1:1的比率)水平的2×109 (CPSB2)和4×109 (CPSB4) CFU / g的饲料。添加益生菌显著提高了体外干物质和纤维降解率(IVDMD和IVCFD),其中ABLB处理效果最显著。这些混合物还减少了甲烷产量和氨氮浓度,同时增加了总挥发性脂肪酸(TVFA),表明发酵效率更高。处理组的原生动物数量显著降低,支持益生菌通过微生物调节减少甲烷的作用(p0.05)。代谢能(ME)、泌乳净能(NEL)和有机物消化率(OMD)的预测值在不同处理期间均有提高。这些发现强调了靶向益生菌制剂在反刍动物系统中提高瘤胃效率和减少环境排放方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of quadric probiotic blends on rumen fermentation, nutrient degradability, and methane emission in sheep: an in vitro study.

The considerable contribution of ruminant livestock to methane emissions has become a major global concern in recent years. Although dietary approaches for reducing ruminant methane emissions have been explored, the sustainable potential of probiotics to influence rumen function and lower methane production has increasingly attracted research attention. While previous studies have focused on single or dual-strain probiotics, this study is among the first to evaluate the synergistic effects of quadric-strain formulations. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of multi-strain probiotic blends, each at two distinct concentrations on rumen fermentation, nutrient degradability, and methane emission in sheep using an in vitro gas production technique following a completely randomized design. The basal diet with no probiotic supplements served as a control, while the supplemented bacterial combinations were Bacillus licheniformis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. bulgaricus, and Bifidobacterium bifidum (ABLB; at a ratio of 1:1:1:1) at levels of 2 × 109 (ABLB2) and 4 × 109 (ABLB4) CFU/g of feed, and Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus plantarum, Bacillus subtilis plus Bifidobacterium bifidum (CPSB; at a ratio of 1:1:1:1) at levels of 2 × 109 (CPSB2) and 4 × 109 (CPSB4) CFU/g of feed. Probiotic supplementation significantly improved in vitro dry matter and fiber degradability (IVDMD and IVCFD), with the most effective results observed in ABLB treatments. These blends also reduced methane production and ammonia-N concentrations, while increasing total volatile fatty acids (TVFA), indicating more efficient fermentation. Protozoa counts were notably lower in treated groups, supporting the role of probiotics in mitigating methane via microbial modulation (P < 0.01). Probiotic supplementation did not affect the values of pH (P > 0.05). Predictive values for metabolizable energy (ME), net energy for lactation (NEL), and organic matter digestibility (OMD) were improved across treatments. These findings highlight the potential of targeted probiotic formulations to enhance rumen efficiency and reduce environmental emissions in ruminant systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AMB Express
AMB Express BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: AMB Express is a high quality journal that brings together research in the area of Applied and Industrial Microbiology with a particular interest in ''White Biotechnology'' and ''Red Biotechnology''. The emphasis is on processes employing microorganisms, eukaryotic cell cultures or enzymes for the biosynthesis, transformation and degradation of compounds. This includes fine and bulk chemicals, polymeric compounds and enzymes or other proteins. Downstream processes are also considered. Integrated processes combining biochemical and chemical processes are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信