犬单侧双门静脉内窥镜腰骶背侧减压的可行性和安全性:一项尸体研究。

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Byongwook Lee, Haebeom Lee, Jaemin Jeong, Hojung Choi, Daehyun Kim, YoungJin Jeon
{"title":"犬单侧双门静脉内窥镜腰骶背侧减压的可行性和安全性:一项尸体研究。","authors":"Byongwook Lee, Haebeom Lee, Jaemin Jeong, Hojung Choi, Daehyun Kim, YoungJin Jeon","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.25.07.0244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic dorsal lumbosacral decompression in dogs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>13 canine cadavers were acquired. Three dogs were used in a pilot study to refine the technique. The remaining 10 were randomly assigned to left- or right-sided procedures. The main study was conducted from November 27 to November 30, 2024, following a pilot study performed 1 month earlier. Preoperative CT aided anatomical assessment and planning. Portal sites were based on the medial pedicle line, connecting the medial borders of the seventh lumbar vertebra and first sacral vertebra pedicles, as identified on dorsoventral radiographs. Unilateral biportal endoscopic dorsal lumbosacral decompression, including dorsal laminectomy, discectomy, and nerve root exploration, was performed. Portal sites, procedural times, and intraoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative CT assessed decompression and facet preservation. A 4-point scoring system (Excellent, Good, Fair, and Poor) was used to evaluate visualization and facet joint preservation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 10 cadavers were Beagles. All procedures were completed successfully through planned portals. Mean surgery time was 56.3 ± 11.4 minutes. Visualization and facet joint preservation were all rated Excellent. Laminectomy and nerve root exploration times were longer ipsilaterally (17.4 ± 7.2 minutes) than contralaterally (9.6 ± 4.2 minutes), with a mean difference of 7.8 minutes. The mean laminectomy area was significantly larger ipsilaterally (17.6 ± 6.7 mm2) versus contralaterally (10.5 ± 7.3 mm2), with a mean difference of 7.1 mm2. No intraoperative complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unilateral biportal endoscopic dorsal lumbosacral decompression was feasible, safe, and provided excellent visualization in canine cadavers.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Unilateral biportal endoscopic dorsal lumbosacral decompression may represent a viable minimally invasive technique for degenerative lumbosacral stenosis in dogs and warrants further clinical investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic dorsal lumbosacral decompression in dogs: a cadaveric study.\",\"authors\":\"Byongwook Lee, Haebeom Lee, Jaemin Jeong, Hojung Choi, Daehyun Kim, YoungJin Jeon\",\"doi\":\"10.2460/ajvr.25.07.0244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic dorsal lumbosacral decompression in dogs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>13 canine cadavers were acquired. Three dogs were used in a pilot study to refine the technique. The remaining 10 were randomly assigned to left- or right-sided procedures. The main study was conducted from November 27 to November 30, 2024, following a pilot study performed 1 month earlier. Preoperative CT aided anatomical assessment and planning. Portal sites were based on the medial pedicle line, connecting the medial borders of the seventh lumbar vertebra and first sacral vertebra pedicles, as identified on dorsoventral radiographs. Unilateral biportal endoscopic dorsal lumbosacral decompression, including dorsal laminectomy, discectomy, and nerve root exploration, was performed. Portal sites, procedural times, and intraoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative CT assessed decompression and facet preservation. A 4-point scoring system (Excellent, Good, Fair, and Poor) was used to evaluate visualization and facet joint preservation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 10 cadavers were Beagles. All procedures were completed successfully through planned portals. Mean surgery time was 56.3 ± 11.4 minutes. Visualization and facet joint preservation were all rated Excellent. Laminectomy and nerve root exploration times were longer ipsilaterally (17.4 ± 7.2 minutes) than contralaterally (9.6 ± 4.2 minutes), with a mean difference of 7.8 minutes. The mean laminectomy area was significantly larger ipsilaterally (17.6 ± 6.7 mm2) versus contralaterally (10.5 ± 7.3 mm2), with a mean difference of 7.1 mm2. No intraoperative complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unilateral biportal endoscopic dorsal lumbosacral decompression was feasible, safe, and provided excellent visualization in canine cadavers.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Unilateral biportal endoscopic dorsal lumbosacral decompression may represent a viable minimally invasive technique for degenerative lumbosacral stenosis in dogs and warrants further clinical investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of veterinary research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of veterinary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.07.0244\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.07.0244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价犬单侧双门静脉内镜腰骶背减压术的可行性和安全性。方法:采集犬类尸体13具。为了改进这项技术,在一项初步研究中使用了三只狗。剩下的10人被随机分配到左侧或右侧手术。主要研究于2024年11月27日至11月30日进行,一个月前进行了一项试点研究。术前CT辅助解剖评估和规划。门静脉位置基于内侧椎弓根线,连接第七腰椎和第一骶椎椎弓根的内侧边界,如背腹侧x线片所示。行单侧双门静脉内镜腰骶背部减压术,包括腰骶背部椎板切除术、椎间盘切除术和神经根探查。记录门静脉位置、手术时间及术中并发症。术后CT评估减压和关节突保存情况。采用4点评分系统(优秀、良好、一般和差)评估可视化和小关节保护。结果:10具尸体均为小猎犬。所有程序都通过计划的门户成功完成。平均手术时间56.3±11.4分钟。可视化和小关节保留均被评为优秀。椎板切除术和神经根探查时间同侧(17.4±7.2分钟)比对侧(9.6±4.2分钟)长,平均差7.8分钟。同侧平均椎板切除面积(17.6±6.7 mm2)明显大于对侧(10.5±7.3 mm2),平均差值为7.1 mm2。无术中并发症发生。结论:单侧双门静脉内窥镜腰骶背侧减压术是可行的,安全的,并且在犬尸体上提供了良好的视觉效果。临床意义:单侧双门静脉内窥镜腰骶背侧减压可能是治疗犬退行性腰骶管狭窄的一种可行的微创技术,值得进一步的临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic dorsal lumbosacral decompression in dogs: a cadaveric study.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic dorsal lumbosacral decompression in dogs.

Methods: 13 canine cadavers were acquired. Three dogs were used in a pilot study to refine the technique. The remaining 10 were randomly assigned to left- or right-sided procedures. The main study was conducted from November 27 to November 30, 2024, following a pilot study performed 1 month earlier. Preoperative CT aided anatomical assessment and planning. Portal sites were based on the medial pedicle line, connecting the medial borders of the seventh lumbar vertebra and first sacral vertebra pedicles, as identified on dorsoventral radiographs. Unilateral biportal endoscopic dorsal lumbosacral decompression, including dorsal laminectomy, discectomy, and nerve root exploration, was performed. Portal sites, procedural times, and intraoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative CT assessed decompression and facet preservation. A 4-point scoring system (Excellent, Good, Fair, and Poor) was used to evaluate visualization and facet joint preservation.

Results: All 10 cadavers were Beagles. All procedures were completed successfully through planned portals. Mean surgery time was 56.3 ± 11.4 minutes. Visualization and facet joint preservation were all rated Excellent. Laminectomy and nerve root exploration times were longer ipsilaterally (17.4 ± 7.2 minutes) than contralaterally (9.6 ± 4.2 minutes), with a mean difference of 7.8 minutes. The mean laminectomy area was significantly larger ipsilaterally (17.6 ± 6.7 mm2) versus contralaterally (10.5 ± 7.3 mm2), with a mean difference of 7.1 mm2. No intraoperative complications occurred.

Conclusions: Unilateral biportal endoscopic dorsal lumbosacral decompression was feasible, safe, and provided excellent visualization in canine cadavers.

Clinical relevance: Unilateral biportal endoscopic dorsal lumbosacral decompression may represent a viable minimally invasive technique for degenerative lumbosacral stenosis in dogs and warrants further clinical investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信