ESG披露不确定性下的企业战略漂绿:融资激励与非线性效应。

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shun Li, Chenglong Liu
{"title":"ESG披露不确定性下的企业战略漂绿:融资激励与非线性效应。","authors":"Shun Li, Chenglong Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As ESG investing becomes increasingly normalized, there is heightened scrutiny on whether companies partake in strategic greenwashing by capitalizing on the ambiguity of ESG disclosures. Drawing on signaling theory and the financing pricing behavior of risk-averse creditors, this study develops a micro-level theoretical model within a game-theoretic framework to explain the incentives for firms to adopt greenwashing behavior (GW) under ambiguous ESG signals. The theoretical analysis suggests that moderate information asymmetry may help reduce financing costs and generate implicit financing dividends, whereas excessive GW may result in regulatory penalties and reputational risks. Based on this framework, the study constructs a firm-level ESG disclosure uncertainty (ESGU) index and conducts an empirical analysis using data from A-share listed companies in China (from 2009 to 2022). The results show that greater ESGU increases the likelihood of firms engaging in GW-emphasizing green narratives while obscuring actual environmental performance. Further analyses reveal that firms with higher debt financing costs, greater information asymmetry, and stronger resource dependence are more likely to leverage ESG signal ambiguity to \"appear green.\" Heterogeneity signifies that audit quality and financial pressure substantially influence the intensity of ESGU on GW. Moreover, GW is found to significantly alleviate firms' financing constraints. A nonlinear relationship is also identified between ESGU and financing constraints, indicating the existence of a marginal \"fuzzy arbitrage\" window. This work offers theoretical and empirical evidence for the economic rationale linking ESG disclosure ambiguity to GW, thereby enhancing the literature on green signaling, strategic compliance, and sustainable finance. The results provide actionable insights for enhancing ESG governance in financial markets and promoting high-quality, sustainable development.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"394 ","pages":"127473"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate strategic greenwashing under ESG disclosure uncertainty: Financing incentives and nonlinear effects.\",\"authors\":\"Shun Li, Chenglong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As ESG investing becomes increasingly normalized, there is heightened scrutiny on whether companies partake in strategic greenwashing by capitalizing on the ambiguity of ESG disclosures. Drawing on signaling theory and the financing pricing behavior of risk-averse creditors, this study develops a micro-level theoretical model within a game-theoretic framework to explain the incentives for firms to adopt greenwashing behavior (GW) under ambiguous ESG signals. The theoretical analysis suggests that moderate information asymmetry may help reduce financing costs and generate implicit financing dividends, whereas excessive GW may result in regulatory penalties and reputational risks. Based on this framework, the study constructs a firm-level ESG disclosure uncertainty (ESGU) index and conducts an empirical analysis using data from A-share listed companies in China (from 2009 to 2022). The results show that greater ESGU increases the likelihood of firms engaging in GW-emphasizing green narratives while obscuring actual environmental performance. Further analyses reveal that firms with higher debt financing costs, greater information asymmetry, and stronger resource dependence are more likely to leverage ESG signal ambiguity to \\\"appear green.\\\" Heterogeneity signifies that audit quality and financial pressure substantially influence the intensity of ESGU on GW. Moreover, GW is found to significantly alleviate firms' financing constraints. A nonlinear relationship is also identified between ESGU and financing constraints, indicating the existence of a marginal \\\"fuzzy arbitrage\\\" window. This work offers theoretical and empirical evidence for the economic rationale linking ESG disclosure ambiguity to GW, thereby enhancing the literature on green signaling, strategic compliance, and sustainable finance. The results provide actionable insights for enhancing ESG governance in financial markets and promoting high-quality, sustainable development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"394 \",\"pages\":\"127473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127473\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着ESG投资日益正常化,企业是否利用ESG披露的模糊性参与了“战略性漂绿”的审查也越来越严格。本研究利用信号理论和风险规避债权人的融资定价行为,在博弈论框架下建立了微观层面的理论模型,解释了模糊ESG信号下企业采取“漂绿”行为的动机。理论分析表明,适度的信息不对称有助于降低融资成本并产生隐性融资红利,而过度的信息不对称则可能导致监管处罚和声誉风险。在此框架下,本研究构建了企业层面ESG披露不确定性(ESGU)指数,并利用2009 - 2022年中国a股上市公司数据进行实证分析。结果表明,更高的ESGU增加了企业参与强调gw的绿色叙事的可能性,同时模糊了实际的环境绩效。进一步分析表明,债务融资成本较高、信息不对称程度较高、资源依赖程度较高的企业更有可能利用ESG信号模糊来“显得环保”。异质性表明审计质量和财务压力在很大程度上影响ESGU对GW的影响强度。此外,研究发现,GW显著缓解了企业的融资约束。ESGU与融资约束之间存在非线性关系,表明存在边际“模糊套利”窗口。本研究为将ESG披露模糊性与GW联系起来的经济原理提供了理论和实证证据,从而加强了关于绿色信号、战略合规和可持续金融的文献。研究结果为加强金融市场ESG治理和促进高质量可持续发展提供了可操作的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corporate strategic greenwashing under ESG disclosure uncertainty: Financing incentives and nonlinear effects.

As ESG investing becomes increasingly normalized, there is heightened scrutiny on whether companies partake in strategic greenwashing by capitalizing on the ambiguity of ESG disclosures. Drawing on signaling theory and the financing pricing behavior of risk-averse creditors, this study develops a micro-level theoretical model within a game-theoretic framework to explain the incentives for firms to adopt greenwashing behavior (GW) under ambiguous ESG signals. The theoretical analysis suggests that moderate information asymmetry may help reduce financing costs and generate implicit financing dividends, whereas excessive GW may result in regulatory penalties and reputational risks. Based on this framework, the study constructs a firm-level ESG disclosure uncertainty (ESGU) index and conducts an empirical analysis using data from A-share listed companies in China (from 2009 to 2022). The results show that greater ESGU increases the likelihood of firms engaging in GW-emphasizing green narratives while obscuring actual environmental performance. Further analyses reveal that firms with higher debt financing costs, greater information asymmetry, and stronger resource dependence are more likely to leverage ESG signal ambiguity to "appear green." Heterogeneity signifies that audit quality and financial pressure substantially influence the intensity of ESGU on GW. Moreover, GW is found to significantly alleviate firms' financing constraints. A nonlinear relationship is also identified between ESGU and financing constraints, indicating the existence of a marginal "fuzzy arbitrage" window. This work offers theoretical and empirical evidence for the economic rationale linking ESG disclosure ambiguity to GW, thereby enhancing the literature on green signaling, strategic compliance, and sustainable finance. The results provide actionable insights for enhancing ESG governance in financial markets and promoting high-quality, sustainable development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信