欧洲规范对低层建筑风荷载规定的评估

IF 2.9 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Taofiq Omoniyi Amoloye, Olalekan Adebayo Olayemi, Kamoru O. Oladosu, Kabiru Mustapha
{"title":"欧洲规范对低层建筑风荷载规定的评估","authors":"Taofiq Omoniyi Amoloye,&nbsp;Olalekan Adebayo Olayemi,&nbsp;Kamoru O. Oladosu,&nbsp;Kabiru Mustapha","doi":"10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06861-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Eurocode provisions are cheaper alternatives to wind tunnel studies in the consideration of wind loading on a structure. Very tall buildings and large structures have enough economic justification for expensive wind tunnel studies in their design stage. Such wind tunnel studies feature simultaneous scanning and acquisition of loading data from hundreds of pressure tappings with subsequent high-speed computer data processing and analysis. This is not the case for low-rise buildings which do not find their way into the wind tunnel except in the case where they are unusual edifices. However, low-rise buildings are the most damaged in wind storms. In addition, their shapes are increasingly different from the traditional and generic forms considered in the Eurocode. Additionally, the current data acquisition techniques are more advanced than were used for the wind tunnel studies in the 80s from which the Eurocode provisions were collated. Pressures are now sampled simultaneously at all taps rather than sequentially, and tubing response is now corrected numerically rather than by optimized tubing methods. Thus, it is of interest to assess the performance of the Eurocode on present building shapes. This defined the aim of the study and its focus on low-rise buildings. In addition, the limit on the required number of pressure tapping to obtain adequate and reliable wind loading information from wind tunnel studies is investigated. The study is based on models of a simple cuboidal building, a quasi-rectangular building with inset faces in its plan, and a building plan featuring a re-entrant corner possessing curved surfaces at the internal and external junctions of its wings. It is concluded that adapting the Eurocode wind loading provisions to irregular building plans characteristic of modern times may give unsafe solutions. The variations of pressure with wind direction on the internal walls of the wings and the curved surface at the internal junction of the re-entrant corner follow coherent wave forms that are mutually similar. These can be further investigated for codification purposes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":792,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal Plus","volume":"140 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of the Eurocode provisions for the wind loading on low-rise buildings\",\"authors\":\"Taofiq Omoniyi Amoloye,&nbsp;Olalekan Adebayo Olayemi,&nbsp;Kamoru O. Oladosu,&nbsp;Kabiru Mustapha\",\"doi\":\"10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06861-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Eurocode provisions are cheaper alternatives to wind tunnel studies in the consideration of wind loading on a structure. Very tall buildings and large structures have enough economic justification for expensive wind tunnel studies in their design stage. Such wind tunnel studies feature simultaneous scanning and acquisition of loading data from hundreds of pressure tappings with subsequent high-speed computer data processing and analysis. This is not the case for low-rise buildings which do not find their way into the wind tunnel except in the case where they are unusual edifices. However, low-rise buildings are the most damaged in wind storms. In addition, their shapes are increasingly different from the traditional and generic forms considered in the Eurocode. Additionally, the current data acquisition techniques are more advanced than were used for the wind tunnel studies in the 80s from which the Eurocode provisions were collated. Pressures are now sampled simultaneously at all taps rather than sequentially, and tubing response is now corrected numerically rather than by optimized tubing methods. Thus, it is of interest to assess the performance of the Eurocode on present building shapes. This defined the aim of the study and its focus on low-rise buildings. In addition, the limit on the required number of pressure tapping to obtain adequate and reliable wind loading information from wind tunnel studies is investigated. The study is based on models of a simple cuboidal building, a quasi-rectangular building with inset faces in its plan, and a building plan featuring a re-entrant corner possessing curved surfaces at the internal and external junctions of its wings. It is concluded that adapting the Eurocode wind loading provisions to irregular building plans characteristic of modern times may give unsafe solutions. The variations of pressure with wind direction on the internal walls of the wings and the curved surface at the internal junction of the re-entrant corner follow coherent wave forms that are mutually similar. These can be further investigated for codification purposes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Physical Journal Plus\",\"volume\":\"140 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Physical Journal Plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"4\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06861-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal Plus","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06861-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在考虑结构上的风荷载时,欧洲规范的规定是比风洞研究更便宜的选择。非常高的建筑和大型结构在设计阶段有足够的经济理由进行昂贵的风洞研究。这种风洞研究的特点是同时扫描和获取来自数百个压力抽头的加载数据,随后进行高速计算机数据处理和分析。这不是低层建筑的情况,除非它们是不寻常的大厦,否则它们不会找到进入风洞的方法。然而,低层建筑在风暴中受损最严重。此外,它们的形状与欧洲法规中考虑的传统和通用形式越来越不同。此外,目前的数据采集技术比80年代用于风洞研究的技术更先进,当时欧洲法规的规定是根据风洞研究整理的。现在在所有水龙头上同时采样压力,而不是依次采样,油管响应现在是数值校正,而不是通过优化油管方法。因此,评估欧洲规范对现有建筑形状的性能是很有意义的。这确定了研究的目的,并将重点放在低层建筑上。此外,还研究了从风洞研究中获得充分和可靠的风荷载信息所需的压力敲击次数的限制。这项研究是基于一个简单的立方体建筑模型,一个在其平面上插入面的准矩形建筑模型,以及一个在其机翼内外连接处具有曲面的可进入角的建筑模型。结论是,将欧洲规范的风荷载规定适用于现代不规则建筑平面可能会产生不安全的解决方案。机翼内壁和返入角内部连接处曲面上的压力随风向的变化遵循相互相似的相干波形。为了编纂的目的,这些可以进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An assessment of the Eurocode provisions for the wind loading on low-rise buildings

The Eurocode provisions are cheaper alternatives to wind tunnel studies in the consideration of wind loading on a structure. Very tall buildings and large structures have enough economic justification for expensive wind tunnel studies in their design stage. Such wind tunnel studies feature simultaneous scanning and acquisition of loading data from hundreds of pressure tappings with subsequent high-speed computer data processing and analysis. This is not the case for low-rise buildings which do not find their way into the wind tunnel except in the case where they are unusual edifices. However, low-rise buildings are the most damaged in wind storms. In addition, their shapes are increasingly different from the traditional and generic forms considered in the Eurocode. Additionally, the current data acquisition techniques are more advanced than were used for the wind tunnel studies in the 80s from which the Eurocode provisions were collated. Pressures are now sampled simultaneously at all taps rather than sequentially, and tubing response is now corrected numerically rather than by optimized tubing methods. Thus, it is of interest to assess the performance of the Eurocode on present building shapes. This defined the aim of the study and its focus on low-rise buildings. In addition, the limit on the required number of pressure tapping to obtain adequate and reliable wind loading information from wind tunnel studies is investigated. The study is based on models of a simple cuboidal building, a quasi-rectangular building with inset faces in its plan, and a building plan featuring a re-entrant corner possessing curved surfaces at the internal and external junctions of its wings. It is concluded that adapting the Eurocode wind loading provisions to irregular building plans characteristic of modern times may give unsafe solutions. The variations of pressure with wind direction on the internal walls of the wings and the curved surface at the internal junction of the re-entrant corner follow coherent wave forms that are mutually similar. These can be further investigated for codification purposes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The European Physical Journal Plus
The European Physical Journal Plus PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.80%
发文量
1150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aims of this peer-reviewed online journal are to distribute and archive all relevant material required to document, assess, validate and reconstruct in detail the body of knowledge in the physical and related sciences. The scope of EPJ Plus encompasses a broad landscape of fields and disciplines in the physical and related sciences - such as covered by the topical EPJ journals and with the explicit addition of geophysics, astrophysics, general relativity and cosmology, mathematical and quantum physics, classical and fluid mechanics, accelerator and medical physics, as well as physics techniques applied to any other topics, including energy, environment and cultural heritage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信