Siddique Motala, Tlotliso Mokomane, David A. Wallace
{"title":"反调查南非种族隔离时代的强制拆迁:档案社会正义的空间方法","authors":"Siddique Motala, Tlotliso Mokomane, David A. Wallace","doi":"10.1007/s10502-025-09517-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper describes and reports on applications of the counter-surveying methodology that reads together geomatics (surveying and mapping) and archival social justice (activation of archives to serve social justice outcomes and counter injustice) in relation to two sites of forced removal: one in District Six in Cape Town and the other in Die Vlakte in Stellenbosch, South Africa. Archives from multiple sources are activated to supplement the recording of the stories of ex-residents who experienced forced removal. Ex-residents further engage through a process of annotating maps from their neighbourhood. In combination this documentation enriches and deepens knowledge about these forced removals. Counter-surveying works to ensure that these demolitions and their ongoing impacts on lives are documented so that their histories and existence are not rendered invisible for future generations. Ex-residents, most of whom are facing their final decades, hold the last remnants of living memory connected to these sites. Counter-surveying provides the opportunity for ex-residents to revisit and recall in the wake of community demolition. This work is motivated by an activist approach and memory for justice ethic that focuses explicitly on land and memory. We close this paper with key findings and invitation to others to take counter-surveying as a praxis and methodology that can be meaningfully applied to other sites of forced removal, working with both the original inhabitants or their descendants who were likewise impacted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-025-09517-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Counter-surveying apartheid-era forced removals in South Africa: a spatial approach to archival social justice\",\"authors\":\"Siddique Motala, Tlotliso Mokomane, David A. Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10502-025-09517-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper describes and reports on applications of the counter-surveying methodology that reads together geomatics (surveying and mapping) and archival social justice (activation of archives to serve social justice outcomes and counter injustice) in relation to two sites of forced removal: one in District Six in Cape Town and the other in Die Vlakte in Stellenbosch, South Africa. Archives from multiple sources are activated to supplement the recording of the stories of ex-residents who experienced forced removal. Ex-residents further engage through a process of annotating maps from their neighbourhood. In combination this documentation enriches and deepens knowledge about these forced removals. Counter-surveying works to ensure that these demolitions and their ongoing impacts on lives are documented so that their histories and existence are not rendered invisible for future generations. Ex-residents, most of whom are facing their final decades, hold the last remnants of living memory connected to these sites. Counter-surveying provides the opportunity for ex-residents to revisit and recall in the wake of community demolition. This work is motivated by an activist approach and memory for justice ethic that focuses explicitly on land and memory. We close this paper with key findings and invitation to others to take counter-surveying as a praxis and methodology that can be meaningfully applied to other sites of forced removal, working with both the original inhabitants or their descendants who were likewise impacted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-025-09517-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09517-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09517-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Counter-surveying apartheid-era forced removals in South Africa: a spatial approach to archival social justice
This paper describes and reports on applications of the counter-surveying methodology that reads together geomatics (surveying and mapping) and archival social justice (activation of archives to serve social justice outcomes and counter injustice) in relation to two sites of forced removal: one in District Six in Cape Town and the other in Die Vlakte in Stellenbosch, South Africa. Archives from multiple sources are activated to supplement the recording of the stories of ex-residents who experienced forced removal. Ex-residents further engage through a process of annotating maps from their neighbourhood. In combination this documentation enriches and deepens knowledge about these forced removals. Counter-surveying works to ensure that these demolitions and their ongoing impacts on lives are documented so that their histories and existence are not rendered invisible for future generations. Ex-residents, most of whom are facing their final decades, hold the last remnants of living memory connected to these sites. Counter-surveying provides the opportunity for ex-residents to revisit and recall in the wake of community demolition. This work is motivated by an activist approach and memory for justice ethic that focuses explicitly on land and memory. We close this paper with key findings and invitation to others to take counter-surveying as a praxis and methodology that can be meaningfully applied to other sites of forced removal, working with both the original inhabitants or their descendants who were likewise impacted.
期刊介绍:
Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context