{"title":"危机下的空间流动:五国的政策响应和移民动态","authors":"Lidan Lyu, Mengyao Cheng, Yu Chen, Xinwei Min","doi":"10.1007/s12061-025-09734-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines how public health crises—particularly the COVID-19 pandemic—have reshaped migration governance and spatial mobility across five countries. Focusing on the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, China, Brazil, and Ghana, the study analyzes policy responses and their implications for migration dynamics. We identify recurring and context‑contingent migration patterns across the five studied countries during the pandemic. Our findings suggest that national responses are shaped by factors such as the epidemic trajectory, economic status, healthcare systems, political structures, and urbanization and demographic characteristics. These policy choices, in turn, reconfigured spatial mobility patterns by constraining transnational and internal movements in uneven ways. These interactions are intrinsically linked to each country’s pre-existing migration patterns and policies. This study provides insights into the complex relationships between crisis-driven mobility control and migration governance, underscoring the long-term implications of pandemic responses for vulnerable populations in diverse, globalized societies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46392,"journal":{"name":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial Mobility Under Crisis: Policy Responses and Migration Dynamics in Five Countries\",\"authors\":\"Lidan Lyu, Mengyao Cheng, Yu Chen, Xinwei Min\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12061-025-09734-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examines how public health crises—particularly the COVID-19 pandemic—have reshaped migration governance and spatial mobility across five countries. Focusing on the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, China, Brazil, and Ghana, the study analyzes policy responses and their implications for migration dynamics. We identify recurring and context‑contingent migration patterns across the five studied countries during the pandemic. Our findings suggest that national responses are shaped by factors such as the epidemic trajectory, economic status, healthcare systems, political structures, and urbanization and demographic characteristics. These policy choices, in turn, reconfigured spatial mobility patterns by constraining transnational and internal movements in uneven ways. These interactions are intrinsically linked to each country’s pre-existing migration patterns and policies. This study provides insights into the complex relationships between crisis-driven mobility control and migration governance, underscoring the long-term implications of pandemic responses for vulnerable populations in diverse, globalized societies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12061-025-09734-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12061-025-09734-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spatial Mobility Under Crisis: Policy Responses and Migration Dynamics in Five Countries
This study examines how public health crises—particularly the COVID-19 pandemic—have reshaped migration governance and spatial mobility across five countries. Focusing on the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, China, Brazil, and Ghana, the study analyzes policy responses and their implications for migration dynamics. We identify recurring and context‑contingent migration patterns across the five studied countries during the pandemic. Our findings suggest that national responses are shaped by factors such as the epidemic trajectory, economic status, healthcare systems, political structures, and urbanization and demographic characteristics. These policy choices, in turn, reconfigured spatial mobility patterns by constraining transnational and internal movements in uneven ways. These interactions are intrinsically linked to each country’s pre-existing migration patterns and policies. This study provides insights into the complex relationships between crisis-driven mobility control and migration governance, underscoring the long-term implications of pandemic responses for vulnerable populations in diverse, globalized societies.
期刊介绍:
Description
The journal has an applied focus: it actively promotes the importance of geographical research in real world settings
It is policy-relevant: it seeks both a readership and contributions from practitioners as well as academics
The substantive foundation is spatial analysis: the use of quantitative techniques to identify patterns and processes within geographic environments
The combination of these points, which are fully reflected in the naming of the journal, establishes a unique position in the marketplace.
RationaleA geographical perspective has always been crucial to the understanding of the social and physical organisation of the world around us. The techniques of spatial analysis provide a powerful means for the assembly and interpretation of evidence, and thus to address critical questions about issues such as crime and deprivation, immigration and demographic restructuring, retailing activity and employment change, resource management and environmental improvement. Many of these issues are equally important to academic research as they are to policy makers and Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy aims to close the gap between these two perspectives by providing a forum for discussion of applied research in a range of different contexts
Topical and interdisciplinaryIncreasingly government organisations, administrative agencies and private businesses are requiring research to support their ‘evidence-based’ strategies or policies. Geographical location is critical in much of this work which extends across a wide range of disciplines including demography, actuarial sciences, statistics, public sector planning, business planning, economics, epidemiology, sociology, social policy, health research, environmental management.
FocusApplied Spatial Analysis and Policy will draw on applied research from diverse problem domains, such as transport, policing, education, health, environment and leisure, in different international contexts. The journal will therefore provide insights into the variations in phenomena that exist across space, it will provide evidence for comparative policy analysis between domains and between locations, and stimulate ideas about the translation of spatial analysis methods and techniques across varied policy contexts. It is essential to know how to measure, monitor and understand spatial distributions, many of which have implications for those with responsibility to plan and enhance the society and the environment in which we all exist.
Readership and Editorial BoardAs a journal focused on applications of methods of spatial analysis, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy will be of interest to scholars and students in a wide range of academic fields, to practitioners in government and administrative agencies and to consultants in private sector organisations. The Editorial Board reflects the international and multidisciplinary nature of the journal.