模块化交叉层压木结构住宅建筑的生命周期评估比较,设计用于拆卸和再利用与传统木结构建筑

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Kieren H. McCord , Heather E. Dillon , Annie Hu , Sadie Carlson , Adam R. Phillips , Yun Joon Jung , Patricia Gunderson , Brittany Tarufelli , Chrissi A. Antonopoulos
{"title":"模块化交叉层压木结构住宅建筑的生命周期评估比较,设计用于拆卸和再利用与传统木结构建筑","authors":"Kieren H. McCord ,&nbsp;Heather E. Dillon ,&nbsp;Annie Hu ,&nbsp;Sadie Carlson ,&nbsp;Adam R. Phillips ,&nbsp;Yun Joon Jung ,&nbsp;Patricia Gunderson ,&nbsp;Brittany Tarufelli ,&nbsp;Chrissi A. Antonopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a need for affordable housing across the U.S., with high-performance modular and prefabricated buildings providing a logical avenue for meeting some of this demand. However, there is a need to balance high performance construction – including low emissions – with affordability. To provide a proof-of-concept in meeting these goals, the Circular Home is a cross-laminated timber (CLT)-based deconstructible and reconfigurable single-family residence that meets high performance targets in moisture, energy, design, economics, and life cycle assessment (LCA). This study focuses on the LCA, presenting a cradle-to-cradle whole-building life cycle assessment (WBLCA) for the Circular Home and a functionally equivalent Baseline Home constructed with traditional materials and methods. The functional unit is 1 <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> of gross floor area across 60 years. Revit building information models (BIM) provided material quantities and Tally LCA was utilized for impact data (inclusive of biogenic carbon sequestration), supplemented with manufacturer environmental product declarations (EPDs). The Circular Home outperforms the baseline residence in most measured impact categories, including global warming potential (GWP), producing −2.73 kgCO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>eq/m<sup>2</sup> in embodied emissions, whereas the modeled baseline has an embodied GWP of 428 kgCO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>eq/m<sup>2</sup>. The careful material selection and advanced building design optimizes performance, with the Circular Home containing only −0.006 times the embodied emissions and −0.02 times the operational emissions of its traditional counterpart. The unique contribution of this work is in the environmental impact comparison of a high-performance modular CLT structure that can be affordably scaled and mass produced in a U.S. market, compared to typical single family home construction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"528 ","pages":"Article 146541"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative life cycle assessment of a modular cross-laminated timber residential building designed for disassembly and reuse versus traditional wood frame construction\",\"authors\":\"Kieren H. McCord ,&nbsp;Heather E. Dillon ,&nbsp;Annie Hu ,&nbsp;Sadie Carlson ,&nbsp;Adam R. Phillips ,&nbsp;Yun Joon Jung ,&nbsp;Patricia Gunderson ,&nbsp;Brittany Tarufelli ,&nbsp;Chrissi A. Antonopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There is a need for affordable housing across the U.S., with high-performance modular and prefabricated buildings providing a logical avenue for meeting some of this demand. However, there is a need to balance high performance construction – including low emissions – with affordability. To provide a proof-of-concept in meeting these goals, the Circular Home is a cross-laminated timber (CLT)-based deconstructible and reconfigurable single-family residence that meets high performance targets in moisture, energy, design, economics, and life cycle assessment (LCA). This study focuses on the LCA, presenting a cradle-to-cradle whole-building life cycle assessment (WBLCA) for the Circular Home and a functionally equivalent Baseline Home constructed with traditional materials and methods. The functional unit is 1 <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> of gross floor area across 60 years. Revit building information models (BIM) provided material quantities and Tally LCA was utilized for impact data (inclusive of biogenic carbon sequestration), supplemented with manufacturer environmental product declarations (EPDs). The Circular Home outperforms the baseline residence in most measured impact categories, including global warming potential (GWP), producing −2.73 kgCO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>eq/m<sup>2</sup> in embodied emissions, whereas the modeled baseline has an embodied GWP of 428 kgCO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>eq/m<sup>2</sup>. The careful material selection and advanced building design optimizes performance, with the Circular Home containing only −0.006 times the embodied emissions and −0.02 times the operational emissions of its traditional counterpart. The unique contribution of this work is in the environmental impact comparison of a high-performance modular CLT structure that can be affordably scaled and mass produced in a U.S. market, compared to typical single family home construction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"528 \",\"pages\":\"Article 146541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625018918\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625018918","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国各地都需要经济适用房,高性能模块化和预制建筑为满足这一需求提供了合理的途径。然而,需要在高性能建筑(包括低排放)和可负担性之间取得平衡。为了提供满足这些目标的概念验证,圆形住宅是一个基于交叉层压木材(CLT)的可解构和可重构的单户住宅,满足湿度、能源、设计、经济和生命周期评估(LCA)的高性能目标。本研究的重点是LCA,提出了循环住宅从摇篮到摇篮的全建筑生命周期评估(WBLCA),以及使用传统材料和方法建造的功能等效基线住宅。该功能单元的总建筑面积为1平方米,跨越60年。Revit建筑信息模型(BIM)提供了材料数量,利用塔利LCA获得了影响数据(包括生物碳封存),并辅以制造商环境产品声明(epd)。在大多数测量的影响类别中,包括全球变暖潜能值(GWP),循环住宅的表现优于基线住宅,其实际排放量为- 2.73 kgCO22eq/m2,而模拟基线的实际GWP为428 kgCO22eq/m2。精心的材料选择和先进的建筑设计优化了性能,圆形住宅的实际排放量仅为传统住宅的- 0.006倍,运行排放量为- 0.02倍。这项工作的独特贡献在于,与典型的单户住宅建筑相比,高性能模块化CLT结构对环境的影响进行了比较,这种结构在美国市场上可以负担得起规模和大规模生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative life cycle assessment of a modular cross-laminated timber residential building designed for disassembly and reuse versus traditional wood frame construction
There is a need for affordable housing across the U.S., with high-performance modular and prefabricated buildings providing a logical avenue for meeting some of this demand. However, there is a need to balance high performance construction – including low emissions – with affordability. To provide a proof-of-concept in meeting these goals, the Circular Home is a cross-laminated timber (CLT)-based deconstructible and reconfigurable single-family residence that meets high performance targets in moisture, energy, design, economics, and life cycle assessment (LCA). This study focuses on the LCA, presenting a cradle-to-cradle whole-building life cycle assessment (WBLCA) for the Circular Home and a functionally equivalent Baseline Home constructed with traditional materials and methods. The functional unit is 1 m2 of gross floor area across 60 years. Revit building information models (BIM) provided material quantities and Tally LCA was utilized for impact data (inclusive of biogenic carbon sequestration), supplemented with manufacturer environmental product declarations (EPDs). The Circular Home outperforms the baseline residence in most measured impact categories, including global warming potential (GWP), producing −2.73 kgCO2eq/m2 in embodied emissions, whereas the modeled baseline has an embodied GWP of 428 kgCO2eq/m2. The careful material selection and advanced building design optimizes performance, with the Circular Home containing only −0.006 times the embodied emissions and −0.02 times the operational emissions of its traditional counterpart. The unique contribution of this work is in the environmental impact comparison of a high-performance modular CLT structure that can be affordably scaled and mass produced in a U.S. market, compared to typical single family home construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信