通过性别特异性计算模型了解心房电生理和心律失常易感性的性别差异机制。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Nathaniel T Herrera, Haibo Ni, Charlotte E R Smith, Yixuan Wu, Dobromir Dobrev, Stefano Morotti, Eleonora Grandi
{"title":"通过性别特异性计算模型了解心房电生理和心律失常易感性的性别差异机制。","authors":"Nathaniel T Herrera, Haibo Ni, Charlotte E R Smith, Yixuan Wu, Dobromir Dobrev, Stefano Morotti, Eleonora Grandi","doi":"10.1113/JP289425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, shows marked sex differences in clinical presentation, treatment response and outcomes. Although prevalence is similar, women often experience more severe symptoms, higher rates of adverse drug effects and reduced treatment efficacy. To investigate the underlying sex-specific AF mechanisms, we developed and validated male and female human atrial cardiomyocyte models that integrate sex-based differences in electrophysiology and calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>) handling under normal sinus rhythm (nSR) and chronic AF (cAF) conditions. Although the model parameterizations and assumptions (based on limited human data) may not capture the full spectrum of clinical variability, the models reproduced key reported sex-dependent differences in human atrial cardiomyocyte action potential (AP) and Ca<sup>2+</sup> transient (CaT) dynamics. Simulations revealed that both sexes exhibited shortened effective refractory periods and wavelengths in cAF vs. nSR. Females were more prone to delayed afterdepolarizations (DADs), whereas males were more susceptible to AP duration (APD) and CaT amplitude (CaT<sub>Amp</sub>) alternans. Population-based modelling identified distinct parameter associations with arrhythmia mechanisms: DAD vulnerability was associated with enhanced ryanodine receptor Ca<sup>2+</sup> sensitivity in females, and alternans in males correlated with reduced L-type Ca<sup>2+</sup> current maximal conductance. Pharmacological simulations revealed sex-specific responses to antiarrhythmic therapies. In males, multiple drug combinations restored APD at 90% repolarization (APD<sub>90</sub>), CaT<sub>Amp</sub> and reduced alternans susceptibility, whereas females responded to only one combination improving APD<sub>90</sub> and CaT<sub>Amp</sub> but with minimal impact on DAD risk. These findings underscore the need for sex-specific therapeutic strategies and support use of computational modelling in guiding precision medicine against AF. KEY POINTS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart rhythm disorder that presents differently in males and females, but how the underlying mechanisms differ in males and females is not fully understood. We developed and validated computer models of male and female human atrial cardiomyocytes that incorporate known sex differences in ion channels and calcium handling under normal sinus rhythm and AF conditions. Under normal rhythm, males and females showed distinct electrical activity, which became less pronounced in AF. In AF, both sexes showed reduced effective refractory period and wavelength and depressed calcium transients. Males were more susceptible to electrical alternans, whereas females showed a greater tendency for calcium-driven delayed afterdepolarizations. Simulated drug treatments showed greater benefit in male models, particularly with combinations targeting multiple potassium channels, whereas female models showed limited response. These results highlight the need for sex-specific approaches to treating AF and may help guide future drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12520146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanistic insights into sex differences in atrial electrophysiology and arrhythmia vulnerability through sex-specific computational models.\",\"authors\":\"Nathaniel T Herrera, Haibo Ni, Charlotte E R Smith, Yixuan Wu, Dobromir Dobrev, Stefano Morotti, Eleonora Grandi\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/JP289425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, shows marked sex differences in clinical presentation, treatment response and outcomes. Although prevalence is similar, women often experience more severe symptoms, higher rates of adverse drug effects and reduced treatment efficacy. To investigate the underlying sex-specific AF mechanisms, we developed and validated male and female human atrial cardiomyocyte models that integrate sex-based differences in electrophysiology and calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>) handling under normal sinus rhythm (nSR) and chronic AF (cAF) conditions. Although the model parameterizations and assumptions (based on limited human data) may not capture the full spectrum of clinical variability, the models reproduced key reported sex-dependent differences in human atrial cardiomyocyte action potential (AP) and Ca<sup>2+</sup> transient (CaT) dynamics. Simulations revealed that both sexes exhibited shortened effective refractory periods and wavelengths in cAF vs. nSR. Females were more prone to delayed afterdepolarizations (DADs), whereas males were more susceptible to AP duration (APD) and CaT amplitude (CaT<sub>Amp</sub>) alternans. Population-based modelling identified distinct parameter associations with arrhythmia mechanisms: DAD vulnerability was associated with enhanced ryanodine receptor Ca<sup>2+</sup> sensitivity in females, and alternans in males correlated with reduced L-type Ca<sup>2+</sup> current maximal conductance. Pharmacological simulations revealed sex-specific responses to antiarrhythmic therapies. In males, multiple drug combinations restored APD at 90% repolarization (APD<sub>90</sub>), CaT<sub>Amp</sub> and reduced alternans susceptibility, whereas females responded to only one combination improving APD<sub>90</sub> and CaT<sub>Amp</sub> but with minimal impact on DAD risk. These findings underscore the need for sex-specific therapeutic strategies and support use of computational modelling in guiding precision medicine against AF. KEY POINTS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart rhythm disorder that presents differently in males and females, but how the underlying mechanisms differ in males and females is not fully understood. We developed and validated computer models of male and female human atrial cardiomyocytes that incorporate known sex differences in ion channels and calcium handling under normal sinus rhythm and AF conditions. Under normal rhythm, males and females showed distinct electrical activity, which became less pronounced in AF. In AF, both sexes showed reduced effective refractory period and wavelength and depressed calcium transients. Males were more susceptible to electrical alternans, whereas females showed a greater tendency for calcium-driven delayed afterdepolarizations. Simulated drug treatments showed greater benefit in male models, particularly with combinations targeting multiple potassium channels, whereas female models showed limited response. These results highlight the need for sex-specific approaches to treating AF and may help guide future drug development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12520146/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP289425\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP289425","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

房颤(AF)是最常见的心律失常,在临床表现、治疗反应和结果上存在明显的性别差异。虽然患病率相似,但妇女往往症状更严重,药物不良反应率更高,治疗效果降低。为了研究潜在的性别特异性房颤机制,我们开发并验证了男性和女性心房心肌细胞模型,该模型整合了正常窦性心律(nSR)和慢性房颤(cAF)条件下电生理和钙(Ca2+)处理的性别差异。尽管模型参数化和假设(基于有限的人类数据)可能无法捕获临床变异性的全部范围,但模型再现了人类心房心肌细胞动作电位(AP)和Ca2+瞬态(CaT)动力学中关键的性别依赖性差异。模拟结果显示,两性在cAF和nSR中都表现出更短的有效不应期和波长。雌性更倾向于延迟后去极化(DADs),而雄性更容易发生AP持续时间(APD)和CaT振幅(CaTAmp)交替。基于人群的建模确定了与心律失常机制的不同参数关联:DAD易感性与女性ryanodine受体Ca2+敏感性增强有关,而男性的交替性与l型Ca2+电流最大电导降低有关。药理学模拟揭示了抗心律失常治疗的性别特异性反应。在男性中,多种药物联合可以恢复90%复极(APD90)和CaTAmp的APD,并降低交替易感性,而女性只有一种药物联合可以改善APD90和CaTAmp,但对DAD风险的影响很小。这些发现强调了针对性别的治疗策略的必要性,并支持使用计算模型来指导针对房颤的精确医学。关键点:房颤(AF)是一种常见的心律紊乱,在男性和女性中表现不同,但男性和女性的潜在机制差异尚不完全清楚。我们开发并验证了男性和女性人类心房心肌细胞的计算机模型,该模型在正常窦性节律和房颤条件下纳入了已知的离子通道和钙处理的性别差异。在节律正常的情况下,男性和女性表现出明显的电活动,而在房颤中,这种电活动变得不那么明显。在房颤中,两性均表现出有效不应期和波长缩短以及钙瞬态降低。男性更容易受到电交替的影响,而女性则更倾向于钙驱动的延迟后去极化。模拟药物治疗在男性模型中显示出更大的益处,特别是针对多个钾通道的组合,而女性模型显示出有限的反应。这些结果强调了治疗房颤的性别特异性方法的必要性,并可能有助于指导未来的药物开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanistic insights into sex differences in atrial electrophysiology and arrhythmia vulnerability through sex-specific computational models.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, shows marked sex differences in clinical presentation, treatment response and outcomes. Although prevalence is similar, women often experience more severe symptoms, higher rates of adverse drug effects and reduced treatment efficacy. To investigate the underlying sex-specific AF mechanisms, we developed and validated male and female human atrial cardiomyocyte models that integrate sex-based differences in electrophysiology and calcium (Ca2+) handling under normal sinus rhythm (nSR) and chronic AF (cAF) conditions. Although the model parameterizations and assumptions (based on limited human data) may not capture the full spectrum of clinical variability, the models reproduced key reported sex-dependent differences in human atrial cardiomyocyte action potential (AP) and Ca2+ transient (CaT) dynamics. Simulations revealed that both sexes exhibited shortened effective refractory periods and wavelengths in cAF vs. nSR. Females were more prone to delayed afterdepolarizations (DADs), whereas males were more susceptible to AP duration (APD) and CaT amplitude (CaTAmp) alternans. Population-based modelling identified distinct parameter associations with arrhythmia mechanisms: DAD vulnerability was associated with enhanced ryanodine receptor Ca2+ sensitivity in females, and alternans in males correlated with reduced L-type Ca2+ current maximal conductance. Pharmacological simulations revealed sex-specific responses to antiarrhythmic therapies. In males, multiple drug combinations restored APD at 90% repolarization (APD90), CaTAmp and reduced alternans susceptibility, whereas females responded to only one combination improving APD90 and CaTAmp but with minimal impact on DAD risk. These findings underscore the need for sex-specific therapeutic strategies and support use of computational modelling in guiding precision medicine against AF. KEY POINTS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart rhythm disorder that presents differently in males and females, but how the underlying mechanisms differ in males and females is not fully understood. We developed and validated computer models of male and female human atrial cardiomyocytes that incorporate known sex differences in ion channels and calcium handling under normal sinus rhythm and AF conditions. Under normal rhythm, males and females showed distinct electrical activity, which became less pronounced in AF. In AF, both sexes showed reduced effective refractory period and wavelength and depressed calcium transients. Males were more susceptible to electrical alternans, whereas females showed a greater tendency for calcium-driven delayed afterdepolarizations. Simulated drug treatments showed greater benefit in male models, particularly with combinations targeting multiple potassium channels, whereas female models showed limited response. These results highlight the need for sex-specific approaches to treating AF and may help guide future drug development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信