公共卫生经济学和基于收入的上游政策:从成本到价值。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Neil McHugh, Rachel Baker, Verity Watson, Neil Craig, David Bomark, Clare Bambra, Victoria J McGowan, Ruth Lightbody, Cam Donaldson
{"title":"公共卫生经济学和基于收入的上游政策:从成本到价值。","authors":"Neil McHugh, Rachel Baker, Verity Watson, Neil Craig, David Bomark, Clare Bambra, Victoria J McGowan, Ruth Lightbody, Cam Donaldson","doi":"10.1057/s41271-025-00604-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Upstream income-based policies are widely accepted by researchers as key levers to address health inequalities. However, scarce public resources mean difficult decisions about policy implementation must be clearly justified. A public mandate, through knowledge of public preferences, offers one route to transformative policy change. But we do not know what, if anything, people would be willing to give-up to reduce health inequalities. Nor whether the type of policy through which health inequalities are reduced matters. We make the case for developing a new public health economics research agenda using stated preference techniques to estimate the economic value for upstream income-based policies and health outcomes by considering Universal Basic Income. This new research area has the potential to advance the use of economic valuation methods within public health economics, generating new evidence to inform policy debates around the implementation of upstream income-based policies and how to address health inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public health economics and upstream income-based policies: from cost to value.\",\"authors\":\"Neil McHugh, Rachel Baker, Verity Watson, Neil Craig, David Bomark, Clare Bambra, Victoria J McGowan, Ruth Lightbody, Cam Donaldson\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41271-025-00604-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Upstream income-based policies are widely accepted by researchers as key levers to address health inequalities. However, scarce public resources mean difficult decisions about policy implementation must be clearly justified. A public mandate, through knowledge of public preferences, offers one route to transformative policy change. But we do not know what, if anything, people would be willing to give-up to reduce health inequalities. Nor whether the type of policy through which health inequalities are reduced matters. We make the case for developing a new public health economics research agenda using stated preference techniques to estimate the economic value for upstream income-based policies and health outcomes by considering Universal Basic Income. This new research area has the potential to advance the use of economic valuation methods within public health economics, generating new evidence to inform policy debates around the implementation of upstream income-based policies and how to address health inequalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-025-00604-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-025-00604-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上游基于收入的政策被研究人员广泛接受为解决卫生不平等的关键杠杆。然而,稀缺的公共资源意味着必须明确证明有关政策实施的艰难决定是合理的。通过了解公众偏好的公共授权,为实现变革性政策变革提供了一条途径。但我们不知道人们愿意放弃什么(如果有的话)来减少卫生不平等。减少卫生不平等的政策类型也不重要。我们提出了发展一个新的公共卫生经济学研究议程的案例,使用陈述偏好技术,通过考虑全民基本收入来估计基于收入的上游政策和健康结果的经济价值。这一新的研究领域有可能推动在公共卫生经济学中使用经济评估方法,产生新的证据,为围绕基于收入的上游政策的实施以及如何解决卫生不平等问题的政策辩论提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public health economics and upstream income-based policies: from cost to value.

Upstream income-based policies are widely accepted by researchers as key levers to address health inequalities. However, scarce public resources mean difficult decisions about policy implementation must be clearly justified. A public mandate, through knowledge of public preferences, offers one route to transformative policy change. But we do not know what, if anything, people would be willing to give-up to reduce health inequalities. Nor whether the type of policy through which health inequalities are reduced matters. We make the case for developing a new public health economics research agenda using stated preference techniques to estimate the economic value for upstream income-based policies and health outcomes by considering Universal Basic Income. This new research area has the potential to advance the use of economic valuation methods within public health economics, generating new evidence to inform policy debates around the implementation of upstream income-based policies and how to address health inequalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Policy
Journal of Public Health Policy 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Policy (JPHP) will continue its 35 year tradition: an accessible source of scholarly articles on the epidemiologic and social foundations of public health policy, rigorously edited, and progressive. JPHP aims to create a more inclusive public health policy dialogue, within nations and among them. It broadens public health policy debates beyond the ''health system'' to examine all forces and environments that impinge on the health of populations. It provides an exciting platform for airing controversy and framing policy debates - honing policies to solve new problems and unresolved old ones. JPHP welcomes unsolicited original scientific and policy contributions on all public health topics. New authors are particularly encouraged to enter debates about how to improve the health of populations and reduce health disparities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信