用外周袖带测量正确估计平均中央主动脉压的新修正公式。

IF 1.9
Mehmet Ozgeyik, Onur Kaypakli
{"title":"用外周袖带测量正确估计平均中央主动脉压的新修正公式。","authors":"Mehmet Ozgeyik, Onur Kaypakli","doi":"10.36660/abc.20240880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mean arterial pressure (MAP) has critical importance in tissue perfusion. In clinical practice, the most used formula was suggested by Gauer, which uses systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and pulse (PP) pressures gathered via the iliac artery (MAP = DBP + 0.333 x PP). However, its results are not reliable for noninvasive recordings as blood pressures are higher.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We derived a corrected formula for the correct calculation of MAP from the noninvasive cuff blood pressure recordings: MAP = DBPcuff + [0.33 + (0.43 - 0.0038 x DBPcuff)] x PPcuff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>149 patients were included in this study. Intra-aortic and cuff blood pressure tracings were obtained simultaneously. The PP coefficient of the standard formula is 0.333 for all calculations. The PP coefficient deviation of the standard formula was calculated with the formula of PP coefficient - 0.333. These two formulas were compared using linear regression analysis and Akaike information criterion (AIC). The level of significance was set at 5% in the statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measured intra-aortic mean pressure was 111.5±13.0 mmHg. The calculated intra-aortic mean pressure by the standard formula and the corrected formula was 105.8±13.5 and 111.3±12.1, respectively. The R, R2, and AIC of the corrected formula were better than the standard formula [(0.905 vs 0.887), (0.818 vs 0.787), and (858.9 vs 1002.7), respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study for the calculation of the MAP from cuff measurements, and the corrected formula has better accuracy than the standard formula for estimation of the MAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"122 9","pages":"e20240880"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Corrected Formula for Correct Estimation of Mean Central Aortic Pressure from Peripheral Cuff Measurements.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Ozgeyik, Onur Kaypakli\",\"doi\":\"10.36660/abc.20240880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mean arterial pressure (MAP) has critical importance in tissue perfusion. In clinical practice, the most used formula was suggested by Gauer, which uses systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and pulse (PP) pressures gathered via the iliac artery (MAP = DBP + 0.333 x PP). However, its results are not reliable for noninvasive recordings as blood pressures are higher.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We derived a corrected formula for the correct calculation of MAP from the noninvasive cuff blood pressure recordings: MAP = DBPcuff + [0.33 + (0.43 - 0.0038 x DBPcuff)] x PPcuff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>149 patients were included in this study. Intra-aortic and cuff blood pressure tracings were obtained simultaneously. The PP coefficient of the standard formula is 0.333 for all calculations. The PP coefficient deviation of the standard formula was calculated with the formula of PP coefficient - 0.333. These two formulas were compared using linear regression analysis and Akaike information criterion (AIC). The level of significance was set at 5% in the statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measured intra-aortic mean pressure was 111.5±13.0 mmHg. The calculated intra-aortic mean pressure by the standard formula and the corrected formula was 105.8±13.5 and 111.3±12.1, respectively. The R, R2, and AIC of the corrected formula were better than the standard formula [(0.905 vs 0.887), (0.818 vs 0.787), and (858.9 vs 1002.7), respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study for the calculation of the MAP from cuff measurements, and the corrected formula has better accuracy than the standard formula for estimation of the MAP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia\",\"volume\":\"122 9\",\"pages\":\"e20240880\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:平均动脉压(MAP)在组织灌注中具有重要意义。在临床实践中,最常用的公式是Gauer提出的,它使用通过髂动脉收集的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和脉压(PP) (MAP = DBP + 0.333 x PP)。然而,由于血压较高,其结果对于无创记录并不可靠。目的:我们从无创袖带血压记录中推导出正确计算MAP的修正公式:MAP = DBPcuff + [0.33 + (0.43 - 0.0038 x DBPcuff)] x PPcuff。方法:纳入149例患者。同时进行主动脉内和袖带血压描记。所有计算标准公式的PP系数为0.333。用PP系数- 0.333公式计算标准配方的PP系数偏差。采用线性回归分析和赤池信息准则(Akaike information criterion, AIC)对两个公式进行比较。统计学分析中显著性水平设为5%。结果:测得主动脉内平均压为111.5±13.0 mmHg。标准公式和修正公式计算的主动脉内平均压分别为105.8±13.5和111.3±12.1。修正后公式的R、R2、AIC均优于标准公式[分别为(0.905 vs 0.887)、(0.818 vs 0.787)、(858.9 vs 1002.7)]。结论:据我们所知,这是第一个从袖带测量中计算MAP的研究,修正后的公式比估计MAP的标准公式具有更好的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A New Corrected Formula for Correct Estimation of Mean Central Aortic Pressure from Peripheral Cuff Measurements.

Background: Mean arterial pressure (MAP) has critical importance in tissue perfusion. In clinical practice, the most used formula was suggested by Gauer, which uses systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and pulse (PP) pressures gathered via the iliac artery (MAP = DBP + 0.333 x PP). However, its results are not reliable for noninvasive recordings as blood pressures are higher.

Objectives: We derived a corrected formula for the correct calculation of MAP from the noninvasive cuff blood pressure recordings: MAP = DBPcuff + [0.33 + (0.43 - 0.0038 x DBPcuff)] x PPcuff.

Methods: 149 patients were included in this study. Intra-aortic and cuff blood pressure tracings were obtained simultaneously. The PP coefficient of the standard formula is 0.333 for all calculations. The PP coefficient deviation of the standard formula was calculated with the formula of PP coefficient - 0.333. These two formulas were compared using linear regression analysis and Akaike information criterion (AIC). The level of significance was set at 5% in the statistical analysis.

Results: The measured intra-aortic mean pressure was 111.5±13.0 mmHg. The calculated intra-aortic mean pressure by the standard formula and the corrected formula was 105.8±13.5 and 111.3±12.1, respectively. The R, R2, and AIC of the corrected formula were better than the standard formula [(0.905 vs 0.887), (0.818 vs 0.787), and (858.9 vs 1002.7), respectively].

Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study for the calculation of the MAP from cuff measurements, and the corrected formula has better accuracy than the standard formula for estimation of the MAP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信