重度获得性脑损伤后的神经行为障碍:患者与护理者认知的差异。

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Benedetta Basagni, Laura Abbruzzese, Mauro Mancuso, Nadia Magnani, Alessia Teresa Virzì, Pierluigi Zoccolotti, Antonio Zuffianò
{"title":"重度获得性脑损伤后的神经行为障碍:患者与护理者认知的差异。","authors":"Benedetta Basagni, Laura Abbruzzese, Mauro Mancuso, Nadia Magnani, Alessia Teresa Virzì, Pierluigi Zoccolotti, Antonio Zuffianò","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2567466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Neurobehavioral disturbances often follow acquired brain injuries. Patients and family members may perceive these anomalies differently, and these discrepancies are difficult to interpret due to methodological constraints. We explored the differing perceptions of behavioral alterations in patients with severe acquired brain injury (sABI) and their caregivers using the Latent Difference Score (LDS) analysis. We also examined the relation between the behavioral ratings and demographic, injury, and functional variables. <b>Method:</b> Data from 154 patients with sABI in the post-acute phase and their caregivers were retrospectively analyzed. The BIRT Personality Questionnaire was used to assess behavioral disorders. <b>Results:</b> We examined four subscales: Lack of Motivation (LoM), Lack of Emotion Regulation (LoER), Negative Emotionality/Reactivity (NE), and Lack of Social Skills (LoSS). Patients generally tended to underestimate their problematic behaviors compared to their family members. Sex predicted patient/caregiver discrepancies in the LoM and LoER subscales, with male patients perceiving themselves as higher functioning than female patients. The scale measuring physical disability was not associated with patient/caregiver discrepancies, except for LoER, with family members' judgments of greater severity correlated with lower functional scores. <b>Conclusions:</b> Notable gaps emerged between subjective and family perceptions, particularly in motivation and social skills. The discrepancies were associated with sex differences. LDS is a promising tool for examining patient/caregiver discrepancies in patients with ABI.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurobehavioral disorders after severe acquired brain injury: Discrepancies between patients and caregivers' perception.\",\"authors\":\"Benedetta Basagni, Laura Abbruzzese, Mauro Mancuso, Nadia Magnani, Alessia Teresa Virzì, Pierluigi Zoccolotti, Antonio Zuffianò\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2025.2567466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Neurobehavioral disturbances often follow acquired brain injuries. Patients and family members may perceive these anomalies differently, and these discrepancies are difficult to interpret due to methodological constraints. We explored the differing perceptions of behavioral alterations in patients with severe acquired brain injury (sABI) and their caregivers using the Latent Difference Score (LDS) analysis. We also examined the relation between the behavioral ratings and demographic, injury, and functional variables. <b>Method:</b> Data from 154 patients with sABI in the post-acute phase and their caregivers were retrospectively analyzed. The BIRT Personality Questionnaire was used to assess behavioral disorders. <b>Results:</b> We examined four subscales: Lack of Motivation (LoM), Lack of Emotion Regulation (LoER), Negative Emotionality/Reactivity (NE), and Lack of Social Skills (LoSS). Patients generally tended to underestimate their problematic behaviors compared to their family members. Sex predicted patient/caregiver discrepancies in the LoM and LoER subscales, with male patients perceiving themselves as higher functioning than female patients. The scale measuring physical disability was not associated with patient/caregiver discrepancies, except for LoER, with family members' judgments of greater severity correlated with lower functional scores. <b>Conclusions:</b> Notable gaps emerged between subjective and family perceptions, particularly in motivation and social skills. The discrepancies were associated with sex differences. LDS is a promising tool for examining patient/caregiver discrepancies in patients with ABI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2567466\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2567466","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:后天性脑损伤后常出现神经行为障碍。患者和家属可能对这些异常有不同的看法,由于方法的限制,这些差异很难解释。我们使用潜在差异评分(LDS)分析探讨了严重获得性脑损伤(sABI)患者及其护理人员对行为改变的不同认知。我们还研究了行为评分与人口统计学、损伤和功能变量之间的关系。方法:回顾性分析154例急性期sABI患者及其护理人员的资料。采用BIRT人格问卷评估行为障碍。结果:我们检查了四个子量表:缺乏动机(LoM)、缺乏情绪调节(LoER)、消极情绪/反应(NE)和缺乏社交技能(LoSS)。与家人相比,患者通常倾向于低估自己的问题行为。性别预测了LoM和LoER亚量表中患者/护理者的差异,男性患者认为自己的功能比女性患者高。除了LoER外,测量身体残疾的量表与患者/护理者差异无关,家庭成员对严重程度的判断与较低的功能评分相关。结论:主观认知和家庭认知之间存在显著差距,尤其是在动机和社交技能方面。这种差异与性别差异有关。LDS是一种很有前途的工具,用于检查ABI患者的患者/护理人员差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neurobehavioral disorders after severe acquired brain injury: Discrepancies between patients and caregivers' perception.

Objective: Neurobehavioral disturbances often follow acquired brain injuries. Patients and family members may perceive these anomalies differently, and these discrepancies are difficult to interpret due to methodological constraints. We explored the differing perceptions of behavioral alterations in patients with severe acquired brain injury (sABI) and their caregivers using the Latent Difference Score (LDS) analysis. We also examined the relation between the behavioral ratings and demographic, injury, and functional variables. Method: Data from 154 patients with sABI in the post-acute phase and their caregivers were retrospectively analyzed. The BIRT Personality Questionnaire was used to assess behavioral disorders. Results: We examined four subscales: Lack of Motivation (LoM), Lack of Emotion Regulation (LoER), Negative Emotionality/Reactivity (NE), and Lack of Social Skills (LoSS). Patients generally tended to underestimate their problematic behaviors compared to their family members. Sex predicted patient/caregiver discrepancies in the LoM and LoER subscales, with male patients perceiving themselves as higher functioning than female patients. The scale measuring physical disability was not associated with patient/caregiver discrepancies, except for LoER, with family members' judgments of greater severity correlated with lower functional scores. Conclusions: Notable gaps emerged between subjective and family perceptions, particularly in motivation and social skills. The discrepancies were associated with sex differences. LDS is a promising tool for examining patient/caregiver discrepancies in patients with ABI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信