设计一种简单的生物测定法评估驱蚊剂对埃及伊蚊(双翅目:库蚊科)的作用:研究刺激源和暴露时间对蚊子行为的影响。

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Brazilian Journal of Biology Pub Date : 2025-09-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1519-6984.293116
A N Santos, A A E Silva
{"title":"设计一种简单的生物测定法评估驱蚊剂对埃及伊蚊(双翅目:库蚊科)的作用:研究刺激源和暴露时间对蚊子行为的影响。","authors":"A N Santos, A A E Silva","doi":"10.1590/1519-6984.293116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Repellents are effective in preventing mosquito contact with the skin and in vitro test modules are widely used in the research of potential repellents against mosquito bites. This study evaluated different stimuli and exposure times to develop a new cost-effective bioassay protocol to test repellents against Aedes aegypti. The test module was designed to present different source of stimuli, i.e. human blood, artificial blood meal (SkitoSnack), and human forearm (standard stimulus) and exposure times, i.e., 2, 5, and 10 min. Ten females were introduced in the module, i.e., 480 mL polypropylene adapted cage, and the number of landings and engorgements on stimuli sources was recorded. Subsequently, the Complete Protection Time (CPT) of DEET was evaluated. A. aegypti mosquitoes consistently landed on the module, with an average of 4.3 mosquitoes in the first min, 5.3 in the second min, and 6.5 in the third min, after which the number decreased after eight min. Similarly, engorgement increased from 3.0 mosquitoes after two min to 7.7 mosquitoes after ten min, across all tested conditions, regardless of the stimulus source. However, prolonged exposure to the stimuli led to an increase in both landings and feedings. The CPT of DEET when using alternative stimulus sources (≈ 48 min) differed from that of the human source (75 min), yet both demonstrated similar antifeeding outcomes. Additionally, both SkitoSnack and blood, when offered through an artificial feeder with a 5-min exposure time, are effective for use in experiments with our module for repellent testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":55326,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Biology","volume":"85 ","pages":"e293116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a simple bioassay to assess repellents against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): investigating stimuli sources and exposure duration on mosquito behavior.\",\"authors\":\"A N Santos, A A E Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1519-6984.293116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Repellents are effective in preventing mosquito contact with the skin and in vitro test modules are widely used in the research of potential repellents against mosquito bites. This study evaluated different stimuli and exposure times to develop a new cost-effective bioassay protocol to test repellents against Aedes aegypti. The test module was designed to present different source of stimuli, i.e. human blood, artificial blood meal (SkitoSnack), and human forearm (standard stimulus) and exposure times, i.e., 2, 5, and 10 min. Ten females were introduced in the module, i.e., 480 mL polypropylene adapted cage, and the number of landings and engorgements on stimuli sources was recorded. Subsequently, the Complete Protection Time (CPT) of DEET was evaluated. A. aegypti mosquitoes consistently landed on the module, with an average of 4.3 mosquitoes in the first min, 5.3 in the second min, and 6.5 in the third min, after which the number decreased after eight min. Similarly, engorgement increased from 3.0 mosquitoes after two min to 7.7 mosquitoes after ten min, across all tested conditions, regardless of the stimulus source. However, prolonged exposure to the stimuli led to an increase in both landings and feedings. The CPT of DEET when using alternative stimulus sources (≈ 48 min) differed from that of the human source (75 min), yet both demonstrated similar antifeeding outcomes. Additionally, both SkitoSnack and blood, when offered through an artificial feeder with a 5-min exposure time, are effective for use in experiments with our module for repellent testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Biology\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"e293116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.293116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.293116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

驱蚊剂能有效防止蚊虫与皮肤接触,体外测试模块被广泛应用于潜在驱蚊剂的研究。本研究评估了不同的刺激和暴露时间,以开发一种新的具有成本效益的生物测定方案来测试对埃及伊蚊的驱蚊剂。测试模块旨在呈现不同的刺激来源,即人血、人工血粉(SkitoSnack)和人前臂(标准刺激),以及暴露时间,即2分钟、5分钟和10分钟。在480 mL聚丙烯改造笼模块中引入10只雌性,记录在刺激源上着陆和膨胀的次数。随后,评估避蚊胺的完全保护时间(CPT)。在所有测试条件下,无论刺激源如何,埃及伊蚊在第1分钟平均有4.3只,第2分钟有5.3只,第3分钟有6.5只,之后8分钟数量减少。同样,在所有测试条件下,埃及伊蚊在2分钟后从3.0只增加到10分钟后的7.7只。然而,长时间暴露在刺激下导致了着陆和进食的增加。避蚊胺替代刺激源的CPT(≈48分钟)与人类刺激源的CPT(75分钟)不同,但两者均表现出相似的抗摄食结果。此外,SkitoSnack和血液,当通过人工喂食器提供5分钟的暴露时间时,在我们的模块的驱避测试实验中都是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing a simple bioassay to assess repellents against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): investigating stimuli sources and exposure duration on mosquito behavior.

Repellents are effective in preventing mosquito contact with the skin and in vitro test modules are widely used in the research of potential repellents against mosquito bites. This study evaluated different stimuli and exposure times to develop a new cost-effective bioassay protocol to test repellents against Aedes aegypti. The test module was designed to present different source of stimuli, i.e. human blood, artificial blood meal (SkitoSnack), and human forearm (standard stimulus) and exposure times, i.e., 2, 5, and 10 min. Ten females were introduced in the module, i.e., 480 mL polypropylene adapted cage, and the number of landings and engorgements on stimuli sources was recorded. Subsequently, the Complete Protection Time (CPT) of DEET was evaluated. A. aegypti mosquitoes consistently landed on the module, with an average of 4.3 mosquitoes in the first min, 5.3 in the second min, and 6.5 in the third min, after which the number decreased after eight min. Similarly, engorgement increased from 3.0 mosquitoes after two min to 7.7 mosquitoes after ten min, across all tested conditions, regardless of the stimulus source. However, prolonged exposure to the stimuli led to an increase in both landings and feedings. The CPT of DEET when using alternative stimulus sources (≈ 48 min) differed from that of the human source (75 min), yet both demonstrated similar antifeeding outcomes. Additionally, both SkitoSnack and blood, when offered through an artificial feeder with a 5-min exposure time, are effective for use in experiments with our module for repellent testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
301
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The BJB – Brazilian Journal of Biology® is a scientific journal devoted to publishing original articles in all fields of the Biological Sciences, i.e., General Biology, Cell Biology, Evolution, Biological Oceanography, Taxonomy, Geographic Distribution, Limnology, Aquatic Biology, Botany, Zoology, Genetics, and Ecology. Priority is given to papers presenting results of researches in the Neotropical region. Material published includes research papers, review papers (upon approval of the Editorial Board), notes, book reviews, and comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信