青年提出的关于未来流行病或突发公共卫生事件的公共卫生规划建议:一项全国德尔菲研究。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Meaghen Quinlan-Davidson, Kristin Cleverley, Skye Barbic, Darren Courtney, Gina Dimitropoulos, Lisa D Hawke, Nadia Nandlall, Clement Ma, Matthew Prebeg, J L Henderson
{"title":"青年提出的关于未来流行病或突发公共卫生事件的公共卫生规划建议:一项全国德尔菲研究。","authors":"Meaghen Quinlan-Davidson, Kristin Cleverley, Skye Barbic, Darren Courtney, Gina Dimitropoulos, Lisa D Hawke, Nadia Nandlall, Clement Ma, Matthew Prebeg, J L Henderson","doi":"10.17269/s41997-025-01109-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To generate concrete, youth-derived recommendations for government, policymakers, and service planners to support public health planning for the next pandemic or public health emergency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a virtual, modified Delphi, Youth Delphi Expert Panel Members rated recommendation items over three rounds, with the option to create their own recommendations items. 'Consensus' was defined a priori if ≥ 70% of the entire group, or subgroups of youth (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, gender and sexual identities), rated items at a 6 or 7 (on a 7-point Likert scale). Items that did not achieve consensus were dropped. Content analysis was used for qualitative responses in Rounds 1 and 2. Youth were engaged as members of an expert advisory committee throughout the design, implementation, and interpretation of findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of n = 40 youth participated in Round 1 with good retention (> 95%) in subsequent rounds. Youth endorsed eleven recommendations to support public health planning for future pandemics or public health emergencies. Youth prioritized easily accessible and understandable information about pandemics; equitably and efficiently distributed vaccines; increased awareness of timely and accessible mental health and substance use services in schools, workplaces, and communities; and greater investment in free or inexpensive MHSU services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For Canada to move forward in a relevant, efficient, and ethically sound manner, decisions must be guided by the population that these decisions affect. These recommendations can be used to guide Canada's strategies and policies to prepare for future public health emergencies and pandemics, prioritizing the needs of youth, families/caregivers, and communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51407,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Youth-developed recommendations on public health planning for future pandemics or public health emergencies: a national Delphi study.\",\"authors\":\"Meaghen Quinlan-Davidson, Kristin Cleverley, Skye Barbic, Darren Courtney, Gina Dimitropoulos, Lisa D Hawke, Nadia Nandlall, Clement Ma, Matthew Prebeg, J L Henderson\",\"doi\":\"10.17269/s41997-025-01109-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To generate concrete, youth-derived recommendations for government, policymakers, and service planners to support public health planning for the next pandemic or public health emergency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a virtual, modified Delphi, Youth Delphi Expert Panel Members rated recommendation items over three rounds, with the option to create their own recommendations items. 'Consensus' was defined a priori if ≥ 70% of the entire group, or subgroups of youth (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, gender and sexual identities), rated items at a 6 or 7 (on a 7-point Likert scale). Items that did not achieve consensus were dropped. Content analysis was used for qualitative responses in Rounds 1 and 2. Youth were engaged as members of an expert advisory committee throughout the design, implementation, and interpretation of findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of n = 40 youth participated in Round 1 with good retention (> 95%) in subsequent rounds. Youth endorsed eleven recommendations to support public health planning for future pandemics or public health emergencies. Youth prioritized easily accessible and understandable information about pandemics; equitably and efficiently distributed vaccines; increased awareness of timely and accessible mental health and substance use services in schools, workplaces, and communities; and greater investment in free or inexpensive MHSU services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For Canada to move forward in a relevant, efficient, and ethically sound manner, decisions must be guided by the population that these decisions affect. These recommendations can be used to guide Canada's strategies and policies to prepare for future public health emergencies and pandemics, prioritizing the needs of youth, families/caregivers, and communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-025-01109-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-025-01109-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:为政府、政策制定者和服务规划者提供具体的、来自青年的建议,以支持下一次大流行或突发公共卫生事件的公共卫生规划。方法:使用虚拟的,修改的德尔菲,青年德尔菲专家小组成员对推荐项目进行了三轮评分,并可选择创建自己的推荐项目。如果整个群体或青年亚群体(例如,年龄,种族/民族,性别和性身份)中有70%以上的人将项目评为6或7(在7分李克特量表上),则“共识”被定义为先验。未达成协商一致意见的项目被删除。第1轮和第2轮的定性反应采用内容分析。青年作为专家咨询委员会的成员参与了整个调查结果的设计、实施和解释。结果:共有n = 40名青年参加了第一轮,在随后的几轮中保持良好(> 95%)。青年核准了11项建议,以支持针对未来大流行病或突发公共卫生事件的公共卫生规划。青年优先考虑易于获得和理解的大流行病信息;公平有效地分发疫苗;提高对在学校、工作场所和社区提供及时和可获得的精神卫生和药物使用服务的认识;并加大对免费或廉价MHSU服务的投资。结论:为了使加拿大以一种相关的、有效的和合乎道德的方式向前发展,决定必须由这些决定所影响的人口来指导。这些建议可用于指导加拿大的战略和政策,为未来的公共卫生紧急情况和大流行病做准备,优先考虑青年、家庭/照顾者和社区的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Youth-developed recommendations on public health planning for future pandemics or public health emergencies: a national Delphi study.

Objectives: To generate concrete, youth-derived recommendations for government, policymakers, and service planners to support public health planning for the next pandemic or public health emergency.

Methods: Using a virtual, modified Delphi, Youth Delphi Expert Panel Members rated recommendation items over three rounds, with the option to create their own recommendations items. 'Consensus' was defined a priori if ≥ 70% of the entire group, or subgroups of youth (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, gender and sexual identities), rated items at a 6 or 7 (on a 7-point Likert scale). Items that did not achieve consensus were dropped. Content analysis was used for qualitative responses in Rounds 1 and 2. Youth were engaged as members of an expert advisory committee throughout the design, implementation, and interpretation of findings.

Results: A total of n = 40 youth participated in Round 1 with good retention (> 95%) in subsequent rounds. Youth endorsed eleven recommendations to support public health planning for future pandemics or public health emergencies. Youth prioritized easily accessible and understandable information about pandemics; equitably and efficiently distributed vaccines; increased awareness of timely and accessible mental health and substance use services in schools, workplaces, and communities; and greater investment in free or inexpensive MHSU services.

Conclusions: For Canada to move forward in a relevant, efficient, and ethically sound manner, decisions must be guided by the population that these decisions affect. These recommendations can be used to guide Canada's strategies and policies to prepare for future public health emergencies and pandemics, prioritizing the needs of youth, families/caregivers, and communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique
Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Public Health is dedicated to fostering excellence in public health research, scholarship, policy and practice. The aim of the Journal is to advance public health research and practice in Canada and around the world, thus contributing to the improvement of the health of populations and the reduction of health inequalities. CJPH publishes original research and scholarly articles submitted in either English or French that are relevant to population and public health. CJPH is an independent, peer-reviewed journal owned by the Canadian Public Health Association and published by Springer.   Énoncé de mission La Revue canadienne de santé publique se consacre à promouvoir l’excellence dans la recherche, les travaux d’érudition, les politiques et les pratiques de santé publique. Son but est de faire progresser la recherche et les pratiques de santé publique au Canada et dans le monde, contribuant ainsi à l’amélioration de la santé des populations et à la réduction des inégalités de santé. La RCSP publie des articles savants et des travaux inédits, soumis en anglais ou en français, qui sont d’intérêt pour la santé publique et des populations. La RCSP est une revue indépendante avec comité de lecture, propriété de l’Association canadienne de santé publique et publiée par Springer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信