用辅助装置评估腰胫外侧缝合技术治疗颅十字韧带破裂:小型犬的尸体压力定位研究。

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Ingoo Kwak, Geonil Moon, Yong Yu, Suyoung Heo
{"title":"用辅助装置评估腰胫外侧缝合技术治疗颅十字韧带破裂:小型犬的尸体压力定位研究。","authors":"Ingoo Kwak, Geonil Moon, Yong Yu, Suyoung Heo","doi":"10.1292/jvms.25-0203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to determine the optimal stifle joint angle for the lateral fabellotibial suture (LFTS) technique in small dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR), by quantitatively assessing biomechanical parameters using pressure mapping and a 3D-printed tension assistant device. LFTS procedures were performed on 12 canine hindlimb cadaveric models divided into five groups: (1) Intact group, (2) cranial cruciate ligament-deficient (CCL) group, and (3-5) stifles fixed at 90°, 105°, and 135° (L90, L105, L135). Suture tension was quantitatively measured using a tensioner. Postoperative evaluations included pedobarography, tibial rotation angle, patellofemoral contact pressure, and femorotibial contact pressure, analyzed via force-sensitive resistors and pressure-sensitive films. Pressure mapping visualizations were used to evaluate joint mechanics and pressure distribution. Statistical analyzes were conducted using two-way ANOVA with post-hoc testing. The applied suture tension differed significantly among angle-fixed groups (P<0.05). Significant correlations were observed between experimental groups and pad pressure distribution (P<0.001). No significant difference in femorotibial contact pressure was noted between the L105 and intact groups. These results suggest that a stifle angle of 105° during LFTS most closely replicates normal joint contact mechanics, offering practical insights for optimizing tensioning protocols in small dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the lateral fabellotibial suture technique with an assistant device for cranial cruciate ligament rupture: a cadaveric investigation of pressure mapping in small dogs.\",\"authors\":\"Ingoo Kwak, Geonil Moon, Yong Yu, Suyoung Heo\",\"doi\":\"10.1292/jvms.25-0203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to determine the optimal stifle joint angle for the lateral fabellotibial suture (LFTS) technique in small dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR), by quantitatively assessing biomechanical parameters using pressure mapping and a 3D-printed tension assistant device. LFTS procedures were performed on 12 canine hindlimb cadaveric models divided into five groups: (1) Intact group, (2) cranial cruciate ligament-deficient (CCL) group, and (3-5) stifles fixed at 90°, 105°, and 135° (L90, L105, L135). Suture tension was quantitatively measured using a tensioner. Postoperative evaluations included pedobarography, tibial rotation angle, patellofemoral contact pressure, and femorotibial contact pressure, analyzed via force-sensitive resistors and pressure-sensitive films. Pressure mapping visualizations were used to evaluate joint mechanics and pressure distribution. Statistical analyzes were conducted using two-way ANOVA with post-hoc testing. The applied suture tension differed significantly among angle-fixed groups (P<0.05). Significant correlations were observed between experimental groups and pad pressure distribution (P<0.001). No significant difference in femorotibial contact pressure was noted between the L105 and intact groups. These results suggest that a stifle angle of 105° during LFTS most closely replicates normal joint contact mechanics, offering practical insights for optimizing tensioning protocols in small dogs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Medical Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.25-0203\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.25-0203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过使用压力成像和3d打印张力辅助装置定量评估生物力学参数,确定用于颅交叉韧带破裂(CCLR)的小型犬的外侧腓骨胫骨缝合(LFTS)技术的最佳膝关节角度。将12只犬后肢尸体模型分为5组:(1)完整组,(2)颅十字韧带缺损(CCL)组和(3-5)固定在90°、105°和135°(L90、L105、L135)的膝关节。使用张力仪定量测量缝合张力。术后评估包括足造影、胫骨旋转角度、髌股接触压力和股胫接触压力,通过力敏电阻和压敏膜进行分析。压力映射可视化用于评估关节力学和压力分布。统计分析采用双因素方差分析和事后检验。固定角度组间应用缝线张力差异有统计学意义(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the lateral fabellotibial suture technique with an assistant device for cranial cruciate ligament rupture: a cadaveric investigation of pressure mapping in small dogs.

This study aimed to determine the optimal stifle joint angle for the lateral fabellotibial suture (LFTS) technique in small dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR), by quantitatively assessing biomechanical parameters using pressure mapping and a 3D-printed tension assistant device. LFTS procedures were performed on 12 canine hindlimb cadaveric models divided into five groups: (1) Intact group, (2) cranial cruciate ligament-deficient (CCL) group, and (3-5) stifles fixed at 90°, 105°, and 135° (L90, L105, L135). Suture tension was quantitatively measured using a tensioner. Postoperative evaluations included pedobarography, tibial rotation angle, patellofemoral contact pressure, and femorotibial contact pressure, analyzed via force-sensitive resistors and pressure-sensitive films. Pressure mapping visualizations were used to evaluate joint mechanics and pressure distribution. Statistical analyzes were conducted using two-way ANOVA with post-hoc testing. The applied suture tension differed significantly among angle-fixed groups (P<0.05). Significant correlations were observed between experimental groups and pad pressure distribution (P<0.001). No significant difference in femorotibial contact pressure was noted between the L105 and intact groups. These results suggest that a stifle angle of 105° during LFTS most closely replicates normal joint contact mechanics, offering practical insights for optimizing tensioning protocols in small dogs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
230
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: JVMS is a peer-reviewed journal and publishes a variety of papers on veterinary science from basic research to applied science and clinical research. JVMS is published monthly and consists of twelve issues per year. Papers are from the areas of anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, toxicology, pathology, immunology, microbiology, virology, parasitology, internal medicine, surgery, clinical pathology, theriogenology, avian disease, public health, ethology, and laboratory animal science. Although JVMS has played a role in publishing the scientific achievements of Japanese researchers and clinicians for many years, it now also accepts papers submitted from all over the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信