Felix Niebhagen, Anna Kirsch, Richard Schau, Sandra Waske, Lars Heubner, Martin Mirus, Axel Rand, Andreas Güldner, Hanns-Christoph Held, Ralph Schneider, Ulf Bodechtel, Jan Mehrholz, Thea Koch, Peter Spieth, Mario Menk
{"title":"有核红细胞作为脓毒症危重病人死亡率的预后标志物:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Felix Niebhagen, Anna Kirsch, Richard Schau, Sandra Waske, Lars Heubner, Martin Mirus, Axel Rand, Andreas Güldner, Hanns-Christoph Held, Ralph Schneider, Ulf Bodechtel, Jan Mehrholz, Thea Koch, Peter Spieth, Mario Menk","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) in the blood of critically ill patients are associated with increased mortality. The predictive value of NRBCs among septic critically ill patients remains indistinct. The aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the predictive validity of NRBCs in septic critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from septic critically ill patients were collected between 2020 and 2023. Daily NRBC values were recorded, and their predictive validity for mortality was statistically analysed. A cut-off level based on the maximum NRBC value during the patients' intensive care unit (ICU) stay was determined using ROC analysis and Youden's method. Survival was depicted using Kaplan-Meier curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>465 septic critically ill patients were analysed. Patients who died had significantly higher maximum NRBC values during their ICU stay compared to survivors (290/µL [60/2010] vs. 30/µL [10/170]; p < 0.001). A cut-off of maximum NRBCs of ≥100/µL effectively divided the study population into two groups with the most significant difference in ICU mortality (AUC 0.745; 95% CI 0.693-0.797; p < 0.001). Increased maximum NRBC values of ≥100/µL were associated with fivefold higher odds of death (odds ratio [OR] 5.03; 95% CI 3.19-7.90; p < 0.001). Higher mortality rates were confirmed using a Cox proportional-hazards model (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84; 95% CI 1.16-2.98; p = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measuring NRBCs can help predict mortality in septic critically ill patients with high prognostic accuracy. A cut-off of ≥100/µL for NRBCs appears to effectively stratify the study population regarding mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101605"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nucleated red blood cells as a prognostic marker for mortality in septic critically ill patients: an observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Felix Niebhagen, Anna Kirsch, Richard Schau, Sandra Waske, Lars Heubner, Martin Mirus, Axel Rand, Andreas Güldner, Hanns-Christoph Held, Ralph Schneider, Ulf Bodechtel, Jan Mehrholz, Thea Koch, Peter Spieth, Mario Menk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) in the blood of critically ill patients are associated with increased mortality. The predictive value of NRBCs among septic critically ill patients remains indistinct. The aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the predictive validity of NRBCs in septic critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from septic critically ill patients were collected between 2020 and 2023. Daily NRBC values were recorded, and their predictive validity for mortality was statistically analysed. A cut-off level based on the maximum NRBC value during the patients' intensive care unit (ICU) stay was determined using ROC analysis and Youden's method. Survival was depicted using Kaplan-Meier curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>465 septic critically ill patients were analysed. Patients who died had significantly higher maximum NRBC values during their ICU stay compared to survivors (290/µL [60/2010] vs. 30/µL [10/170]; p < 0.001). A cut-off of maximum NRBCs of ≥100/µL effectively divided the study population into two groups with the most significant difference in ICU mortality (AUC 0.745; 95% CI 0.693-0.797; p < 0.001). Increased maximum NRBC values of ≥100/µL were associated with fivefold higher odds of death (odds ratio [OR] 5.03; 95% CI 3.19-7.90; p < 0.001). Higher mortality rates were confirmed using a Cox proportional-hazards model (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84; 95% CI 1.16-2.98; p = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measuring NRBCs can help predict mortality in septic critically ill patients with high prognostic accuracy. A cut-off of ≥100/µL for NRBCs appears to effectively stratify the study population regarding mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101605\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101605","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:危重患者血液中的有核红细胞(nrbc)与死亡率增加有关。nrbc对脓毒症危重患者的预测价值尚不明确。本分析的目的是评估nrbc对脓毒症危重患者的预测有效性。方法:收集2020 - 2023年感染性重症患者的数据。记录每日NRBC值,并统计分析其预测死亡率的有效性。以患者在重症监护病房(ICU)期间的最大NRBC值为基础,采用ROC分析和Youden方法确定截断水平。生存率用Kaplan-Meier曲线描述。结果:对465例脓毒症危重患者进行了分析。死亡患者在ICU住院期间的最大NRBC值明显高于存活患者(290/µL [60/2010] vs. 30/µL [10/170]; p结论:测定NRBC有助于预测脓毒症危重患者的死亡率,预后准确性高。nrbc的临界值≥100/µL似乎可以有效地对研究人群的死亡率进行分层。
Nucleated red blood cells as a prognostic marker for mortality in septic critically ill patients: an observational study.
Background: Nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) in the blood of critically ill patients are associated with increased mortality. The predictive value of NRBCs among septic critically ill patients remains indistinct. The aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the predictive validity of NRBCs in septic critically ill patients.
Methods: Data from septic critically ill patients were collected between 2020 and 2023. Daily NRBC values were recorded, and their predictive validity for mortality was statistically analysed. A cut-off level based on the maximum NRBC value during the patients' intensive care unit (ICU) stay was determined using ROC analysis and Youden's method. Survival was depicted using Kaplan-Meier curves.
Results: 465 septic critically ill patients were analysed. Patients who died had significantly higher maximum NRBC values during their ICU stay compared to survivors (290/µL [60/2010] vs. 30/µL [10/170]; p < 0.001). A cut-off of maximum NRBCs of ≥100/µL effectively divided the study population into two groups with the most significant difference in ICU mortality (AUC 0.745; 95% CI 0.693-0.797; p < 0.001). Increased maximum NRBC values of ≥100/µL were associated with fivefold higher odds of death (odds ratio [OR] 5.03; 95% CI 3.19-7.90; p < 0.001). Higher mortality rates were confirmed using a Cox proportional-hazards model (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84; 95% CI 1.16-2.98; p = 0.012).
Conclusions: Measuring NRBCs can help predict mortality in septic critically ill patients with high prognostic accuracy. A cut-off of ≥100/µL for NRBCs appears to effectively stratify the study population regarding mortality.
期刊介绍:
Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.