心脏手术后重症监护病房早期活动的范围综述。

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Emily K Phillips, Jacqueline L Hay, Caroline Monnin, April Gregora, Kathy Smith, Carly Shaski, Gavin Bozek, Sarah Gilchrist, Andrew Fagan, Maureen C Ashe, Anna M Chudyk, Annette S H Schultz, Sheila O'Keefe-McCarthy, Rakesh C Arora, Todd A Duhamel
{"title":"心脏手术后重症监护病房早期活动的范围综述。","authors":"Emily K Phillips, Jacqueline L Hay, Caroline Monnin, April Gregora, Kathy Smith, Carly Shaski, Gavin Bozek, Sarah Gilchrist, Andrew Fagan, Maureen C Ashe, Anna M Chudyk, Annette S H Schultz, Sheila O'Keefe-McCarthy, Rakesh C Arora, Todd A Duhamel","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early mobility in the intensive care unit (ICU) within 24 hours following cardiac surgery (CS) is guideline-recommended, safe, and supports improved patient outcomes. The evolution of early mobility following CS research has not been explored. Prior reviews have not included non-randomized controlled trials nor assessed the quality of intervention reporting using standard guidelines.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review addresses these gaps and maps CS ICU early mobility literature to understand the extent, range, and nature of the extant literature.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The databases Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.org, and CS association websites were searched from inception to January 2025. Extracted details included early mobility definitions and modes, outcome measures, alignment of intervention reporting with the Consensus of Exercise Reporting Template (CERT), and the inclusion of sex/gender in results/discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 109 studies were included. 43 studies defined early mobility, ranging from the day of surgery to within 2 weeks post-operatively. Many early mobility modes were noted, most commonly ambulation. Primary outcomes varied, with hospital length of stay and pulmonary function the most often studied. There was a consistent lack of reporting of CERT items. Only two studies presented findings disaggregated by sex/gender, and only 13 studies considered sex/gender in the discussion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is inconsistency in the extant CS ICU early mobility literature, specifically in early mobility definitions and modes, outcome measures, quality of intervention reporting, and consideration of sex/gender. Improvements to research design and reporting should be encouraged to support the advancement of the science.</p>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101603"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoping Review of Early Mobility in the Intensive Care Unit Following Cardiac Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Emily K Phillips, Jacqueline L Hay, Caroline Monnin, April Gregora, Kathy Smith, Carly Shaski, Gavin Bozek, Sarah Gilchrist, Andrew Fagan, Maureen C Ashe, Anna M Chudyk, Annette S H Schultz, Sheila O'Keefe-McCarthy, Rakesh C Arora, Todd A Duhamel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early mobility in the intensive care unit (ICU) within 24 hours following cardiac surgery (CS) is guideline-recommended, safe, and supports improved patient outcomes. The evolution of early mobility following CS research has not been explored. Prior reviews have not included non-randomized controlled trials nor assessed the quality of intervention reporting using standard guidelines.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review addresses these gaps and maps CS ICU early mobility literature to understand the extent, range, and nature of the extant literature.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The databases Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.org, and CS association websites were searched from inception to January 2025. Extracted details included early mobility definitions and modes, outcome measures, alignment of intervention reporting with the Consensus of Exercise Reporting Template (CERT), and the inclusion of sex/gender in results/discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 109 studies were included. 43 studies defined early mobility, ranging from the day of surgery to within 2 weeks post-operatively. Many early mobility modes were noted, most commonly ambulation. Primary outcomes varied, with hospital length of stay and pulmonary function the most often studied. There was a consistent lack of reporting of CERT items. Only two studies presented findings disaggregated by sex/gender, and only 13 studies considered sex/gender in the discussion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is inconsistency in the extant CS ICU early mobility literature, specifically in early mobility definitions and modes, outcome measures, quality of intervention reporting, and consideration of sex/gender. Improvements to research design and reporting should be encouraged to support the advancement of the science.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101603\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101603","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心脏手术(CS)后24小时内重症监护病房(ICU)的早期活动是指南推荐的,安全的,并支持改善患者预后。CS研究后早期流动性的演变尚未得到探讨。先前的综述没有纳入非随机对照试验,也没有使用标准指南评估干预报告的质量。目的:本范围综述解决了这些空白,并绘制了CS ICU早期活动的文献,以了解现有文献的范围、范围和性质。设计:检索数据库Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、Scopus、CINAHL、ClinicalTrials.org和CS协会网站,检索时间从成立到2025年1月。提取的细节包括早期活动定义和模式、结果测量、干预报告与运动报告模板共识(CERT)的一致性,以及在结果/讨论中包含性别/性别。结果:共纳入109项研究。43项研究定义了早期活动能力,从手术当天到术后2周内。注意到许多早期活动方式,最常见的是步行。主要结局各不相同,住院时间和肺功能是最常被研究的。一直缺乏对CERT项目的报告。只有两项研究提出了按性/性别分类的结果,只有13项研究在讨论中考虑了性/性别。结论:现有的CS ICU早期活动文献存在不一致,特别是在早期活动的定义和模式、结果测量、干预报告的质量以及对性别/性别的考虑方面。应该鼓励改进研究设计和报告,以支持科学的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scoping Review of Early Mobility in the Intensive Care Unit Following Cardiac Surgery.

Introduction: Early mobility in the intensive care unit (ICU) within 24 hours following cardiac surgery (CS) is guideline-recommended, safe, and supports improved patient outcomes. The evolution of early mobility following CS research has not been explored. Prior reviews have not included non-randomized controlled trials nor assessed the quality of intervention reporting using standard guidelines.

Objective: This scoping review addresses these gaps and maps CS ICU early mobility literature to understand the extent, range, and nature of the extant literature.

Design: The databases Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.org, and CS association websites were searched from inception to January 2025. Extracted details included early mobility definitions and modes, outcome measures, alignment of intervention reporting with the Consensus of Exercise Reporting Template (CERT), and the inclusion of sex/gender in results/discussions.

Results: A total of 109 studies were included. 43 studies defined early mobility, ranging from the day of surgery to within 2 weeks post-operatively. Many early mobility modes were noted, most commonly ambulation. Primary outcomes varied, with hospital length of stay and pulmonary function the most often studied. There was a consistent lack of reporting of CERT items. Only two studies presented findings disaggregated by sex/gender, and only 13 studies considered sex/gender in the discussion.

Conclusions: There is inconsistency in the extant CS ICU early mobility literature, specifically in early mobility definitions and modes, outcome measures, quality of intervention reporting, and consideration of sex/gender. Improvements to research design and reporting should be encouraged to support the advancement of the science.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信