计算机辅助的跨诊断CBT干预并发焦虑和物质使用障碍的可行性、可接受性和初步临床影响。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Alan Z Sheinfil, Michael A Cucciare, Kate Wolitzky-Taylor, Jeffrey A Cully, Jan A Lindsay, Anthony H Ecker
{"title":"计算机辅助的跨诊断CBT干预并发焦虑和物质使用障碍的可行性、可接受性和初步临床影响。","authors":"Alan Z Sheinfil, Michael A Cucciare, Kate Wolitzky-Taylor, Jeffrey A Cully, Jan A Lindsay, Anthony H Ecker","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2025.2559174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical impact of Veterans Affairs Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management- Substance (VA CALM-S), a computer-assisted, transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral intervention for co-occurring anxiety and substance use disorders (SUDs) among veterans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Veterans with co-occurring anxiety and SUDs were randomized to receive VA CALM-S (n = 14) or usual care (n = 12). Acceptability and feasibility were assessed via treatment completion rates and qualitative feedback. Changes in self-reported anxiety symptoms, substance use, and substance-related consequences were assessed at posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five percent of participants completed all VA CALM-S modules. Qualitative feedback indicated the intervention was well-received and helpful. Moderate-to-large effect sizes were observed for VA CALM-S in reducing anxiety symptoms (<i>d</i> = 0.64), substance use (<i>d</i> = 0.69), and substance-related consequences (<i>d</i> = 0.34). Relatively smaller effect sizes were observed for the usual care condition in anxiety symptoms (<i>d</i> = 0.24), substance use (<i>d</i> = 0.12), and substance-related consequences (<i>d</i> = -0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support the feasibility and acceptability of VA CALM-S for veterans with co-occurring anxiety and SUDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Clinical Impact of a Computer-Assisted Transdiagnostic CBT Intervention for Veterans with Co-Occurring Anxiety and Substance Use Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Alan Z Sheinfil, Michael A Cucciare, Kate Wolitzky-Taylor, Jeffrey A Cully, Jan A Lindsay, Anthony H Ecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15504263.2025.2559174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical impact of Veterans Affairs Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management- Substance (VA CALM-S), a computer-assisted, transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral intervention for co-occurring anxiety and substance use disorders (SUDs) among veterans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Veterans with co-occurring anxiety and SUDs were randomized to receive VA CALM-S (n = 14) or usual care (n = 12). Acceptability and feasibility were assessed via treatment completion rates and qualitative feedback. Changes in self-reported anxiety symptoms, substance use, and substance-related consequences were assessed at posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five percent of participants completed all VA CALM-S modules. Qualitative feedback indicated the intervention was well-received and helpful. Moderate-to-large effect sizes were observed for VA CALM-S in reducing anxiety symptoms (<i>d</i> = 0.64), substance use (<i>d</i> = 0.69), and substance-related consequences (<i>d</i> = 0.34). Relatively smaller effect sizes were observed for the usual care condition in anxiety symptoms (<i>d</i> = 0.24), substance use (<i>d</i> = 0.12), and substance-related consequences (<i>d</i> = -0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support the feasibility and acceptability of VA CALM-S for veterans with co-occurring anxiety and SUDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dual Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dual Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2025.2559174\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2025.2559174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨退伍军人事务协调焦虑学习和管理-物质(VA CALM-S)的可行性、可接受性和初步临床效果,这是一种计算机辅助、跨诊断的认知行为干预方法,用于治疗退伍军人共发焦虑和物质使用障碍(sud)。方法:合并焦虑和sud的退伍军人随机接受VA CALM-S (n = 14)或常规护理(n = 12)。通过治疗完成率和定性反馈评估可接受性和可行性。在治疗后评估自我报告的焦虑症状、药物使用和药物相关后果的变化。结果:85%的参与者完成了所有VA CALM-S模块。定性反馈表明,干预措施很受欢迎,也很有帮助。VA CALM-S在减轻焦虑症状(d = 0.64)、物质使用(d = 0.69)和物质相关后果(d = 0.34)方面观察到中等到较大的效应。在焦虑症状(d = 0.24)、物质使用(d = 0.12)和物质相关后果(d = -0.46)的常规护理条件中,观察到相对较小的效应值。结论:研究结果支持VA CALM-S对并发焦虑和sud的退伍军人的可行性和可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Clinical Impact of a Computer-Assisted Transdiagnostic CBT Intervention for Veterans with Co-Occurring Anxiety and Substance Use Disorders.

Objective: This study examined feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical impact of Veterans Affairs Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management- Substance (VA CALM-S), a computer-assisted, transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral intervention for co-occurring anxiety and substance use disorders (SUDs) among veterans.

Methods: Veterans with co-occurring anxiety and SUDs were randomized to receive VA CALM-S (n = 14) or usual care (n = 12). Acceptability and feasibility were assessed via treatment completion rates and qualitative feedback. Changes in self-reported anxiety symptoms, substance use, and substance-related consequences were assessed at posttreatment.

Results: Eighty-five percent of participants completed all VA CALM-S modules. Qualitative feedback indicated the intervention was well-received and helpful. Moderate-to-large effect sizes were observed for VA CALM-S in reducing anxiety symptoms (d = 0.64), substance use (d = 0.69), and substance-related consequences (d = 0.34). Relatively smaller effect sizes were observed for the usual care condition in anxiety symptoms (d = 0.24), substance use (d = 0.12), and substance-related consequences (d = -0.46).

Conclusions: Findings support the feasibility and acceptability of VA CALM-S for veterans with co-occurring anxiety and SUDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信