怀孕机动车辆乘员的伤害模式和安全带有效性:来自1998-2021年美国碰撞数据的证据

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Corina Espelien, Ruyun Jin, Michelle L Oyen, Mary Gallaher, Susan Mostofizadeh, Rachel VanRyzin, Thomas Hartka, Jason Forman, Pavel Chernyavskiy
{"title":"怀孕机动车辆乘员的伤害模式和安全带有效性:来自1998-2021年美国碰撞数据的证据","authors":"Corina Espelien, Ruyun Jin, Michelle L Oyen, Mary Gallaher, Susan Mostofizadeh, Rachel VanRyzin, Thomas Hartka, Jason Forman, Pavel Chernyavskiy","doi":"10.1186/s40621-025-00607-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are the most common etiology of trauma and non-obstetric fetal death among pregnant individuals. Seat belts prevent MVC-related injuries; however, some pregnant individuals do not wear a seat belt due to discomfort and concerns about belt-related safety for their fetus. Highlighted by stagnating seat belt use rates over time and potential for incorrect usage, seat belt effectiveness among pregnant occupants requires further study. Here, crash data 1998-2021 for pregnant occupants from National Automotive Sampling System - Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS) and the Crash Investigation Sampling System (CISS) were analyzed to: 1) evaluate the effectiveness of seat belts on preventing whole-body injury outcomes; 2) evaluate the effectiveness of seat belts on preventing body region-specific injuries; and 3) investigate vehicle- and occupant-specific factors that modify the risk of injuries. Adjusted for occupant and vehicle factors, seat belts prevented whole-body injuries as well as injuries to critical body regions such as the brain, thorax, and pelvis. Although three-point seat belts are effective in improving injury outcomes for pregnant occupants overall, there is room to improve their effectiveness for specific body regions (e.g., abdomen, uterus/placenta). Importantly, no elevated injury risk to pregnant occupants from wearing a seat belt during an MVC was found.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"12 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Injury patterns and seat belt effectiveness in pregnant motor vehicle occupants: evidence from US crash data, 1998-2021.\",\"authors\":\"Corina Espelien, Ruyun Jin, Michelle L Oyen, Mary Gallaher, Susan Mostofizadeh, Rachel VanRyzin, Thomas Hartka, Jason Forman, Pavel Chernyavskiy\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40621-025-00607-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are the most common etiology of trauma and non-obstetric fetal death among pregnant individuals. Seat belts prevent MVC-related injuries; however, some pregnant individuals do not wear a seat belt due to discomfort and concerns about belt-related safety for their fetus. Highlighted by stagnating seat belt use rates over time and potential for incorrect usage, seat belt effectiveness among pregnant occupants requires further study. Here, crash data 1998-2021 for pregnant occupants from National Automotive Sampling System - Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS) and the Crash Investigation Sampling System (CISS) were analyzed to: 1) evaluate the effectiveness of seat belts on preventing whole-body injury outcomes; 2) evaluate the effectiveness of seat belts on preventing body region-specific injuries; and 3) investigate vehicle- and occupant-specific factors that modify the risk of injuries. Adjusted for occupant and vehicle factors, seat belts prevented whole-body injuries as well as injuries to critical body regions such as the brain, thorax, and pelvis. Although three-point seat belts are effective in improving injury outcomes for pregnant occupants overall, there is room to improve their effectiveness for specific body regions (e.g., abdomen, uterus/placenta). Importantly, no elevated injury risk to pregnant occupants from wearing a seat belt during an MVC was found.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487210/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-025-00607-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-025-00607-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机动车碰撞(MVCs)是最常见的病因外伤和非产科胎儿死亡的孕妇个体。安全带防止mvc相关伤害;然而,一些孕妇由于不舒服和担心安全带对胎儿的安全而不系安全带。随着时间的推移,安全带使用率停滞不前,并且可能存在不正确的使用,因此,安全带在怀孕乘员中的有效性需要进一步研究。本文分析了1998-2021年来自国家汽车抽样系统-耐撞数据系统(NASS-CDS)和碰撞调查抽样系统(CISS)的怀孕乘员的碰撞数据,目的是:1)评估安全带预防全身损伤结果的有效性;2)评价安全带预防人体区域伤害的有效性;3)调查改变伤害风险的车辆和乘员特定因素。根据乘员和车辆因素进行调整后,安全带可以防止全身伤害以及对身体关键部位(如大脑、胸部和骨盆)的伤害。虽然三点式安全带在总体上有效地改善了怀孕乘员的伤害结果,但在特定的身体区域(如腹部、子宫/胎盘),其有效性仍有提高的空间。重要的是,没有发现孕妇在车祸中系安全带会增加受伤风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Injury patterns and seat belt effectiveness in pregnant motor vehicle occupants: evidence from US crash data, 1998-2021.

Injury patterns and seat belt effectiveness in pregnant motor vehicle occupants: evidence from US crash data, 1998-2021.

Injury patterns and seat belt effectiveness in pregnant motor vehicle occupants: evidence from US crash data, 1998-2021.

Injury patterns and seat belt effectiveness in pregnant motor vehicle occupants: evidence from US crash data, 1998-2021.

Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are the most common etiology of trauma and non-obstetric fetal death among pregnant individuals. Seat belts prevent MVC-related injuries; however, some pregnant individuals do not wear a seat belt due to discomfort and concerns about belt-related safety for their fetus. Highlighted by stagnating seat belt use rates over time and potential for incorrect usage, seat belt effectiveness among pregnant occupants requires further study. Here, crash data 1998-2021 for pregnant occupants from National Automotive Sampling System - Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS) and the Crash Investigation Sampling System (CISS) were analyzed to: 1) evaluate the effectiveness of seat belts on preventing whole-body injury outcomes; 2) evaluate the effectiveness of seat belts on preventing body region-specific injuries; and 3) investigate vehicle- and occupant-specific factors that modify the risk of injuries. Adjusted for occupant and vehicle factors, seat belts prevented whole-body injuries as well as injuries to critical body regions such as the brain, thorax, and pelvis. Although three-point seat belts are effective in improving injury outcomes for pregnant occupants overall, there is room to improve their effectiveness for specific body regions (e.g., abdomen, uterus/placenta). Importantly, no elevated injury risk to pregnant occupants from wearing a seat belt during an MVC was found.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Injury Epidemiology
Injury Epidemiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Injury Epidemiology is dedicated to advancing the scientific foundation for injury prevention and control through timely publication and dissemination of peer-reviewed research. Injury Epidemiology aims to be the premier venue for communicating epidemiologic studies of unintentional and intentional injuries, including, but not limited to, morbidity and mortality from motor vehicle crashes, drug overdose/poisoning, falls, drowning, fires/burns, iatrogenic injury, suicide, homicide, assaults, and abuse. We welcome investigations designed to understand the magnitude, distribution, determinants, causes, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and outcomes of injuries in specific population groups, geographic regions, and environmental settings (e.g., home, workplace, transport, recreation, sports, and urban/rural). Injury Epidemiology has a special focus on studies generating objective and practical knowledge that can be translated into interventions to reduce injury morbidity and mortality on a population level. Priority consideration will be given to manuscripts that feature contemporary theories and concepts, innovative methods, and novel techniques as applied to injury surveillance, risk assessment, development and implementation of effective interventions, and program and policy evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信