{"title":"在COVID-19大流行期间用酒精自我治疗:COVID-19的压力将人们分为不饮酒者,适度饮酒者和酗酒者。","authors":"Andrew Lac","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2025.2558178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> People may consume alcohol as a self-medicating strategy to cope with the stressors of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study evaluated COVID-19 stresses in distinguishing nondrinkers, moderate drinkers, and binge drinkers as guided by the self-medication hypothesis. <b>Methods:</b> Adults (<i>N</i> = 484) answered a question assessing drinker type (nondrinkers vs. moderate drinkers vs. binge drinkers) and completed the COVID-19 Stress Scales embodied by the subscales of danger and contamination stress, socioeconomic stress, xenophobia stress, traumatic stress, and compulsive checking stress. <b>Results:</b> Discriminant function analysis using the set of five COVID-19 stress subscales as predictors statistically classified participants into nondrinkers, moderate drinkers, and binge drinkers for the male and female samples. Afterward, 2 (gender: males vs. females) × 3 (drinker status: nondrinkers vs. moderate drinkers vs. binge drinkers) factorial multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and analyses of variance (ANOVAs) scrutinized mean differences. Specifically, males compared to females experienced significantly higher socioeconomic stress, xenophobia stress, traumatic stress, and compulsive checking stress, but no gender difference was exhibited for danger and contamination stress. Furthermore, binge drinkers compared to nondrinkers reported significantly higher scores on all the COVID-19 stress subscales. Binge drinkers compared to moderate drinkers endorsed significantly higher scores on all the COVID-19 stress subscales. Moderate drinkers compared to nondrinkers exhibited significantly higher scores on all COVID-19 subscales except for danger and contamination stress. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings are consistent with the self-medication, such that people experiencing more COVID-19 pandemic stresses are more likely to consume alcohol in heavier quantities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Medicating With Alcohol During the COVID-19 Pandemic: COVID-19 Stresses Classify People Into Nondrinkers, Moderate Drinkers, and Binge Drinkers.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Lac\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15504263.2025.2558178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> People may consume alcohol as a self-medicating strategy to cope with the stressors of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study evaluated COVID-19 stresses in distinguishing nondrinkers, moderate drinkers, and binge drinkers as guided by the self-medication hypothesis. <b>Methods:</b> Adults (<i>N</i> = 484) answered a question assessing drinker type (nondrinkers vs. moderate drinkers vs. binge drinkers) and completed the COVID-19 Stress Scales embodied by the subscales of danger and contamination stress, socioeconomic stress, xenophobia stress, traumatic stress, and compulsive checking stress. <b>Results:</b> Discriminant function analysis using the set of five COVID-19 stress subscales as predictors statistically classified participants into nondrinkers, moderate drinkers, and binge drinkers for the male and female samples. Afterward, 2 (gender: males vs. females) × 3 (drinker status: nondrinkers vs. moderate drinkers vs. binge drinkers) factorial multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and analyses of variance (ANOVAs) scrutinized mean differences. Specifically, males compared to females experienced significantly higher socioeconomic stress, xenophobia stress, traumatic stress, and compulsive checking stress, but no gender difference was exhibited for danger and contamination stress. Furthermore, binge drinkers compared to nondrinkers reported significantly higher scores on all the COVID-19 stress subscales. Binge drinkers compared to moderate drinkers endorsed significantly higher scores on all the COVID-19 stress subscales. Moderate drinkers compared to nondrinkers exhibited significantly higher scores on all COVID-19 subscales except for danger and contamination stress. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings are consistent with the self-medication, such that people experiencing more COVID-19 pandemic stresses are more likely to consume alcohol in heavier quantities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dual Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dual Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2025.2558178\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2025.2558178","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Self-Medicating With Alcohol During the COVID-19 Pandemic: COVID-19 Stresses Classify People Into Nondrinkers, Moderate Drinkers, and Binge Drinkers.
Objective: People may consume alcohol as a self-medicating strategy to cope with the stressors of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study evaluated COVID-19 stresses in distinguishing nondrinkers, moderate drinkers, and binge drinkers as guided by the self-medication hypothesis. Methods: Adults (N = 484) answered a question assessing drinker type (nondrinkers vs. moderate drinkers vs. binge drinkers) and completed the COVID-19 Stress Scales embodied by the subscales of danger and contamination stress, socioeconomic stress, xenophobia stress, traumatic stress, and compulsive checking stress. Results: Discriminant function analysis using the set of five COVID-19 stress subscales as predictors statistically classified participants into nondrinkers, moderate drinkers, and binge drinkers for the male and female samples. Afterward, 2 (gender: males vs. females) × 3 (drinker status: nondrinkers vs. moderate drinkers vs. binge drinkers) factorial multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and analyses of variance (ANOVAs) scrutinized mean differences. Specifically, males compared to females experienced significantly higher socioeconomic stress, xenophobia stress, traumatic stress, and compulsive checking stress, but no gender difference was exhibited for danger and contamination stress. Furthermore, binge drinkers compared to nondrinkers reported significantly higher scores on all the COVID-19 stress subscales. Binge drinkers compared to moderate drinkers endorsed significantly higher scores on all the COVID-19 stress subscales. Moderate drinkers compared to nondrinkers exhibited significantly higher scores on all COVID-19 subscales except for danger and contamination stress. Conclusions: The findings are consistent with the self-medication, such that people experiencing more COVID-19 pandemic stresses are more likely to consume alcohol in heavier quantities.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.