儿童造血干细胞移植出院教学量表效度、信度及测量不变性的研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Kimberly L Klages, Courtney Gibson, Julia K Herriott, Lauren Szulczewski, Ahna L H Pai
{"title":"儿童造血干细胞移植出院教学量表效度、信度及测量不变性的研究。","authors":"Kimberly L Klages, Courtney Gibson, Julia K Herriott, Lauren Szulczewski, Ahna L H Pai","doi":"10.1177/27527530251369751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAdherence to treatment following hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is critical, yet the complexity and demands of postdischarge regimens often lead to suboptimal adherence among families unprepared for the transition home. Discharge teaching has been reliably evaluated using the Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale (QDTS) across several health conditions, with higher scores associated with improved parental readiness and pediatric health outcomes. This scale may be helpful in identifying areas for improvement in pediatric HSCT discharge teaching if validated in a pediatric HSCT population.MethodThis study recruited 120 caregivers of children who recently underwent HSCT to complete the QDTS along with measures of parental efficacy/control, psychological distress, and psychosocial risk factors. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the factor structure and measurement invariance of the scale, while internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and correlations with related constructs.ResultsCFA showed that the QDTS had adequate model fit and was invariant across biological sex and income, but not diagnosis. The QDTS demonstrated good internal reliability (content α = .76; delivery α = .90) and criterion validity, with significant correlations with the subscales of related constructs. Independent samples <i>t</i>-tests revealed that caregivers of children with malignant diagnoses reported worse quality of discharge teaching compared to those with nonmalignant diagnoses.DiscussionThis study supports the use of the QDTS as a valid and reliable tool for assessing the quality of discharge teaching for caregivers of children undergoing pediatric HSCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":29692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"27527530251369751"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale Validity, Reliability, and Measurement Invariance in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly L Klages, Courtney Gibson, Julia K Herriott, Lauren Szulczewski, Ahna L H Pai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27527530251369751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundAdherence to treatment following hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is critical, yet the complexity and demands of postdischarge regimens often lead to suboptimal adherence among families unprepared for the transition home. Discharge teaching has been reliably evaluated using the Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale (QDTS) across several health conditions, with higher scores associated with improved parental readiness and pediatric health outcomes. This scale may be helpful in identifying areas for improvement in pediatric HSCT discharge teaching if validated in a pediatric HSCT population.MethodThis study recruited 120 caregivers of children who recently underwent HSCT to complete the QDTS along with measures of parental efficacy/control, psychological distress, and psychosocial risk factors. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the factor structure and measurement invariance of the scale, while internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and correlations with related constructs.ResultsCFA showed that the QDTS had adequate model fit and was invariant across biological sex and income, but not diagnosis. The QDTS demonstrated good internal reliability (content α = .76; delivery α = .90) and criterion validity, with significant correlations with the subscales of related constructs. Independent samples <i>t</i>-tests revealed that caregivers of children with malignant diagnoses reported worse quality of discharge teaching compared to those with nonmalignant diagnoses.DiscussionThis study supports the use of the QDTS as a valid and reliable tool for assessing the quality of discharge teaching for caregivers of children undergoing pediatric HSCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"27527530251369751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490800/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27527530251369751\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27527530251369751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后的治疗依从性是至关重要的,然而出院后治疗方案的复杂性和需求往往导致没有准备好过渡家庭的家庭的依从性不够理想。使用出院教学质量量表(QDTS)对几种健康状况下的出院教学进行了可靠的评估,得分越高,父母的准备程度越高,儿童的健康状况也越好。如果在儿童HSCT人群中得到验证,该量表可能有助于确定儿科HSCT出院教学中需要改进的领域。方法本研究招募了120名最近接受了HSCT的儿童的照顾者,让他们完成QDTS,并测量父母的效能/控制、心理困扰和社会心理风险因素。验证性因子分析(CFA)用于检验量表的因子结构和测量不变性,而内部信度采用Cronbach's alpha和相关构念的相关性进行评估。结果scfa结果表明,QDTS具有良好的模型拟合,且在生理性别和收入上不变化,但在诊断上不变化。QDTS具有良好的内部信度(含量α = 0.76;90)和标准效度,与相关构念的子量表显著相关。独立样本t检验显示,与非恶性诊断的儿童相比,患有恶性诊断的儿童的护理人员报告的出院教学质量较差。本研究支持使用QDTS作为评估儿童HSCT护理人员出院教学质量的有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale Validity, Reliability, and Measurement Invariance in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant.

BackgroundAdherence to treatment following hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is critical, yet the complexity and demands of postdischarge regimens often lead to suboptimal adherence among families unprepared for the transition home. Discharge teaching has been reliably evaluated using the Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale (QDTS) across several health conditions, with higher scores associated with improved parental readiness and pediatric health outcomes. This scale may be helpful in identifying areas for improvement in pediatric HSCT discharge teaching if validated in a pediatric HSCT population.MethodThis study recruited 120 caregivers of children who recently underwent HSCT to complete the QDTS along with measures of parental efficacy/control, psychological distress, and psychosocial risk factors. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the factor structure and measurement invariance of the scale, while internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and correlations with related constructs.ResultsCFA showed that the QDTS had adequate model fit and was invariant across biological sex and income, but not diagnosis. The QDTS demonstrated good internal reliability (content α = .76; delivery α = .90) and criterion validity, with significant correlations with the subscales of related constructs. Independent samples t-tests revealed that caregivers of children with malignant diagnoses reported worse quality of discharge teaching compared to those with nonmalignant diagnoses.DiscussionThis study supports the use of the QDTS as a valid and reliable tool for assessing the quality of discharge teaching for caregivers of children undergoing pediatric HSCT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信