Ching Feng Wu, Ming Ju Hsieh, Yueh Fu Fang, Yi Yu Lin, Diego Gonzalez Rivas, Ching Yang Wu
{"title":"临床I期肺癌患者单解剖切除的生存效果:一项观察队列研究。","authors":"Ching Feng Wu, Ming Ju Hsieh, Yueh Fu Fang, Yi Yu Lin, Diego Gonzalez Rivas, Ching Yang Wu","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (uVATS) is increasingly adopted for early-stage lung cancer, long-term survival data comparing different forms of anatomic resection remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes-specifically, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)-of patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent uVATS segmentectomy or lobectomy. Secondary outcomes included perioperative parameters and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent uVATS anatomical resection (lobectomy or segmentectomy) between January 2014 and December 2020. The primary endpoints were 5-year DFS and OS, while the secondary endpoints included operative time, drainage duration, hospital stay, conversion rates, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 386 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC underwent uVATS anatomical resection, with 280 receiving lobectomy and 106 undergoing segmentectomy. The 5-year DFS and OS rates did not significantly differ between segmentectomy and lobectomy for patients with pathological stage IA tumors. Segmentectomy was associated with a shorter drainage duration. The overall conversion rate to multiple-port VATS or thoracotomy was 1.8%, with no 30-day surgical mortality observed. Prolonged air leaks were the most common complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>uVATS anatomical resection is an effective treatment option for clinical stage I NSCLC, offering comparable long-term survival outcomes for segmentectomy and lobectomy in selected patients. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and optimize patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 19","pages":"e70169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival Effectiveness of Uniport Anatomic Resections in Patients With Clinical Stage I Lung Cancer: An Observation Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ching Feng Wu, Ming Ju Hsieh, Yueh Fu Fang, Yi Yu Lin, Diego Gonzalez Rivas, Ching Yang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1759-7714.70169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (uVATS) is increasingly adopted for early-stage lung cancer, long-term survival data comparing different forms of anatomic resection remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes-specifically, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)-of patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent uVATS segmentectomy or lobectomy. Secondary outcomes included perioperative parameters and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent uVATS anatomical resection (lobectomy or segmentectomy) between January 2014 and December 2020. The primary endpoints were 5-year DFS and OS, while the secondary endpoints included operative time, drainage duration, hospital stay, conversion rates, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 386 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC underwent uVATS anatomical resection, with 280 receiving lobectomy and 106 undergoing segmentectomy. The 5-year DFS and OS rates did not significantly differ between segmentectomy and lobectomy for patients with pathological stage IA tumors. Segmentectomy was associated with a shorter drainage duration. The overall conversion rate to multiple-port VATS or thoracotomy was 1.8%, with no 30-day surgical mortality observed. Prolonged air leaks were the most common complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>uVATS anatomical resection is an effective treatment option for clinical stage I NSCLC, offering comparable long-term survival outcomes for segmentectomy and lobectomy in selected patients. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and optimize patient selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"volume\":\"16 19\",\"pages\":\"e70169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490315/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70169\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Survival Effectiveness of Uniport Anatomic Resections in Patients With Clinical Stage I Lung Cancer: An Observation Cohort Study.
Objective: Although uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (uVATS) is increasingly adopted for early-stage lung cancer, long-term survival data comparing different forms of anatomic resection remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes-specifically, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)-of patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent uVATS segmentectomy or lobectomy. Secondary outcomes included perioperative parameters and complication rates.
Method: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent uVATS anatomical resection (lobectomy or segmentectomy) between January 2014 and December 2020. The primary endpoints were 5-year DFS and OS, while the secondary endpoints included operative time, drainage duration, hospital stay, conversion rates, and postoperative complications.
Results: A total of 386 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC underwent uVATS anatomical resection, with 280 receiving lobectomy and 106 undergoing segmentectomy. The 5-year DFS and OS rates did not significantly differ between segmentectomy and lobectomy for patients with pathological stage IA tumors. Segmentectomy was associated with a shorter drainage duration. The overall conversion rate to multiple-port VATS or thoracotomy was 1.8%, with no 30-day surgical mortality observed. Prolonged air leaks were the most common complication.
Conclusion: uVATS anatomical resection is an effective treatment option for clinical stage I NSCLC, offering comparable long-term survival outcomes for segmentectomy and lobectomy in selected patients. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and optimize patient selection.
期刊介绍:
Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society.
The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.