偏离甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)指南对甲状旁腺疾病患者的手术计划:临床影响是什么?

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2025.109705
Shaleen V Sathe, Abigail Chmiel, Caroline Jones, William E Gillanders, John A Olson, Taylor C Brown
{"title":"偏离甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)指南对甲状旁腺疾病患者的手术计划:临床影响是什么?","authors":"Shaleen V Sathe, Abigail Chmiel, Caroline Jones, William E Gillanders, John A Olson, Taylor C Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems standardizes thyroid nodule classification to assess malignancy risk. The use of preoperative ultrasound before parathyroidectomy often detects incidental thyroid nodules, prompting consideration of additional evaluation and/or concomitant thyroid surgery to minimize need for reoperative surgery. This study evaluated clinician adherence to Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems guidelines for patients with parathyroid disease and associated clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 992 patients undergoing parathyroidectomy (2019-2024) examined the role of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems in preoperative planning and the clinical decision-making after incidental discovery of thyroid nodules. Descriptive and univariate statistical analyses were performed to compare guideline-concordant and discordant care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 957 patients with a formal preoperative ultrasound, 406 (42.4%) had at least 1 thyroid nodule with the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems classification reported by a radiologist. Among those with a nodule, 154 (37.9%) underwent fine-needle aspiration and 56 (13.8%) underwent concomitant thyroid surgery for the nodule. Notably, 47 fine-needle aspiration procedures (30.5%) did not meet Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems criteria. Patients who received guideline-discordant fine-needle aspiration procedures were less likely to undergo thyroid surgery (12.8% vs 34.9%, P = .005) or receive a diagnosis of thyroid cancer (4.3% vs 16.8%, P = .037). Overall, most malignancies were low risk per American Thyroid Association guidelines (n = 20, 80.0%), regardless of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many patients undergoing parathyroidectomy receive additional interventions for incidental thyroid nodules. However, adherence to Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems guidelines may help reduce unnecessary surgery, because most identified malignancies are low risk. The long-term impact remains unclear, emphasizing the need for shared decision-making between surgeons and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"109705"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deviating from Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TI-RADS) guidelines in surgical planning for patients with parathyroid disease: What is the clinical impact?\",\"authors\":\"Shaleen V Sathe, Abigail Chmiel, Caroline Jones, William E Gillanders, John A Olson, Taylor C Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems standardizes thyroid nodule classification to assess malignancy risk. The use of preoperative ultrasound before parathyroidectomy often detects incidental thyroid nodules, prompting consideration of additional evaluation and/or concomitant thyroid surgery to minimize need for reoperative surgery. This study evaluated clinician adherence to Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems guidelines for patients with parathyroid disease and associated clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 992 patients undergoing parathyroidectomy (2019-2024) examined the role of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems in preoperative planning and the clinical decision-making after incidental discovery of thyroid nodules. Descriptive and univariate statistical analyses were performed to compare guideline-concordant and discordant care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 957 patients with a formal preoperative ultrasound, 406 (42.4%) had at least 1 thyroid nodule with the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems classification reported by a radiologist. Among those with a nodule, 154 (37.9%) underwent fine-needle aspiration and 56 (13.8%) underwent concomitant thyroid surgery for the nodule. Notably, 47 fine-needle aspiration procedures (30.5%) did not meet Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems criteria. Patients who received guideline-discordant fine-needle aspiration procedures were less likely to undergo thyroid surgery (12.8% vs 34.9%, P = .005) or receive a diagnosis of thyroid cancer (4.3% vs 16.8%, P = .037). Overall, most malignancies were low risk per American Thyroid Association guidelines (n = 20, 80.0%), regardless of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many patients undergoing parathyroidectomy receive additional interventions for incidental thyroid nodules. However, adherence to Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems guidelines may help reduce unnecessary surgery, because most identified malignancies are low risk. The long-term impact remains unclear, emphasizing the need for shared decision-making between surgeons and patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"109705\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2025.109705\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2025.109705","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统标准化甲状腺结节分类以评估恶性风险。甲状旁腺切除术前的术前超声检查经常发现偶发的甲状腺结节,提示考虑额外的评估和/或合并甲状腺手术,以尽量减少再手术的需要。本研究评估了临床医生对甲状旁腺疾病患者甲状腺成像报告和数据系统指南的依从性以及相关的临床结果。方法:回顾性分析2019-2024年992例甲状旁腺切除术患者,探讨甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统在意外发现甲状腺结节后的术前规划和临床决策中的作用。采用描述性和单变量统计分析比较指南一致性和不一致性护理。结果:957例术前正式超声检查的患者中,406例(42.4%)至少有1个甲状腺结节,并有放射科医生报告甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统分类。在有结节的患者中,154例(37.9%)接受了细针穿刺治疗,56例(13.8%)接受了甲状腺手术治疗。值得注意的是,47例细针抽吸手术(30.5%)不符合甲状腺成像报告和数据系统标准。接受与指南不一致的细针抽吸手术的患者接受甲状腺手术(12.8%对34.9%,P = 0.005)或接受甲状腺癌诊断(4.3%对16.8%,P = 0.037)的可能性较小。总体而言,根据美国甲状腺协会指南,无论甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统标准如何,大多数恶性肿瘤都是低风险的(n = 20,80.0%)。结论:许多接受甲状旁腺切除术的患者因偶发甲状腺结节而接受额外的干预。然而,坚持甲状腺成像报告和数据系统指南可能有助于减少不必要的手术,因为大多数已确定的恶性肿瘤是低风险的。长期影响尚不清楚,这强调了外科医生和患者共同决策的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deviating from Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TI-RADS) guidelines in surgical planning for patients with parathyroid disease: What is the clinical impact?

Background: The American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems standardizes thyroid nodule classification to assess malignancy risk. The use of preoperative ultrasound before parathyroidectomy often detects incidental thyroid nodules, prompting consideration of additional evaluation and/or concomitant thyroid surgery to minimize need for reoperative surgery. This study evaluated clinician adherence to Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems guidelines for patients with parathyroid disease and associated clinical outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective review of 992 patients undergoing parathyroidectomy (2019-2024) examined the role of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems in preoperative planning and the clinical decision-making after incidental discovery of thyroid nodules. Descriptive and univariate statistical analyses were performed to compare guideline-concordant and discordant care.

Results: Of 957 patients with a formal preoperative ultrasound, 406 (42.4%) had at least 1 thyroid nodule with the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems classification reported by a radiologist. Among those with a nodule, 154 (37.9%) underwent fine-needle aspiration and 56 (13.8%) underwent concomitant thyroid surgery for the nodule. Notably, 47 fine-needle aspiration procedures (30.5%) did not meet Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems criteria. Patients who received guideline-discordant fine-needle aspiration procedures were less likely to undergo thyroid surgery (12.8% vs 34.9%, P = .005) or receive a diagnosis of thyroid cancer (4.3% vs 16.8%, P = .037). Overall, most malignancies were low risk per American Thyroid Association guidelines (n = 20, 80.0%), regardless of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems criteria.

Conclusion: Many patients undergoing parathyroidectomy receive additional interventions for incidental thyroid nodules. However, adherence to Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems guidelines may help reduce unnecessary surgery, because most identified malignancies are low risk. The long-term impact remains unclear, emphasizing the need for shared decision-making between surgeons and patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信