肺癌患者术后肺功能的肺叶特异性变异性:与传统预测模型的纵向分析和比较。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respirology Pub Date : 2025-10-02 DOI:10.1111/resp.70133
Yeong Jeong Jeon, Sumin Shin, Sunga Kong, Seongwoo Yang, Jong Ho Cho, Hong Kwan Kim, Young Mog Shim, Danbee Kang, Hye Yun Park
{"title":"肺癌患者术后肺功能的肺叶特异性变异性:与传统预测模型的纵向分析和比较。","authors":"Yeong Jeong Jeon, Sumin Shin, Sunga Kong, Seongwoo Yang, Jong Ho Cho, Hong Kwan Kim, Young Mog Shim, Danbee Kang, Hye Yun Park","doi":"10.1111/resp.70133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Lobectomy is the primary treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, pulmonary function declines postoperatively, presenting a significant challenge. This study investigated pulmonary function following lobectomy and compared these changes with predicted lung function based on the traditional segmental method, focusing on resected lobe-specific variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included 419 patients who underwent lobectomies for NSCLC. Pulmonary function tests measuring forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV<sub>1</sub>), and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were conducted preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. We compared the observed pulmonary function values to the predicted postoperative (PPO) values based on the traditional segmental method and analysed lobe-specific differences using mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Left upper and right lower lobectomies demonstrated observed pulmonary function values similar to their PPOs as early as 2 weeks postoperatively. However, the other lobes declined significantly, with an approximately 25% reduction in FVC, FEV1, and DLCO, regardless of the number of segments in the lobe. Three months postoperatively, observed pulmonary function values exceeded PPO values across all lobes. Surgical approach (open vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery), right upper lobectomy in the reference to right lower lobectomy, and postoperative decreased physical activity were significant factors related to the non-recovery of lung function to their PPOs at 6 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative pulmonary function recovery varied significantly by resected lobe, with most lobes showing better recovery than predicted postoperative values. Accurate outcome prediction requires accounting for lobe-specific characteristics and compensatory mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":21129,"journal":{"name":"Respirology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lobe-Specific Variability in Postoperative Pulmonary Function in Lung Cancer Patients: A Longitudinal Analysis and Comparison With Traditional Predictive Models.\",\"authors\":\"Yeong Jeong Jeon, Sumin Shin, Sunga Kong, Seongwoo Yang, Jong Ho Cho, Hong Kwan Kim, Young Mog Shim, Danbee Kang, Hye Yun Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/resp.70133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Lobectomy is the primary treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, pulmonary function declines postoperatively, presenting a significant challenge. This study investigated pulmonary function following lobectomy and compared these changes with predicted lung function based on the traditional segmental method, focusing on resected lobe-specific variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included 419 patients who underwent lobectomies for NSCLC. Pulmonary function tests measuring forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV<sub>1</sub>), and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were conducted preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. We compared the observed pulmonary function values to the predicted postoperative (PPO) values based on the traditional segmental method and analysed lobe-specific differences using mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Left upper and right lower lobectomies demonstrated observed pulmonary function values similar to their PPOs as early as 2 weeks postoperatively. However, the other lobes declined significantly, with an approximately 25% reduction in FVC, FEV1, and DLCO, regardless of the number of segments in the lobe. Three months postoperatively, observed pulmonary function values exceeded PPO values across all lobes. Surgical approach (open vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery), right upper lobectomy in the reference to right lower lobectomy, and postoperative decreased physical activity were significant factors related to the non-recovery of lung function to their PPOs at 6 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative pulmonary function recovery varied significantly by resected lobe, with most lobes showing better recovery than predicted postoperative values. Accurate outcome prediction requires accounting for lobe-specific characteristics and compensatory mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respirology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respirology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.70133\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.70133","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:肺叶切除术是早期非小细胞肺癌的主要治疗方法。然而,术后肺功能下降,提出了重大挑战。本研究调查肺叶切除术后的肺功能,并将这些变化与基于传统节段法预测的肺功能进行比较,重点关注切除的肺叶特异性变异性。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究包括419例接受非小细胞肺癌肺叶切除术的患者。术前及术后1、3、6、12个月分别进行肺功能测试,测量用力肺活量(FVC)、用力呼气量(FEV1)和一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)。我们将观察到的肺功能值与基于传统分段法的术后预测(PPO)值进行比较,并使用混合效应模型分析肺叶特异性差异。结果:左上叶和右下叶早在术后2周就显示了与PPOs相似的肺功能值。然而,其他叶明显下降,FVC、FEV1和DLCO减少约25%,与叶中节段的数量无关。术后3个月,观察到肺功能值超过所有肺叶的PPO值。手术入路(开放与视频胸腔镜手术)、右上肺叶切除术(参照右下肺叶切除术)和术后体力活动减少是术后6个月肺功能未恢复到PPOs的重要因素。结论:不同肺叶术后肺功能恢复差异显著,多数肺叶恢复好于术后预测值。准确的预后预测需要考虑脑叶特异性特征和代偿机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lobe-Specific Variability in Postoperative Pulmonary Function in Lung Cancer Patients: A Longitudinal Analysis and Comparison With Traditional Predictive Models.

Background and objective: Lobectomy is the primary treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, pulmonary function declines postoperatively, presenting a significant challenge. This study investigated pulmonary function following lobectomy and compared these changes with predicted lung function based on the traditional segmental method, focusing on resected lobe-specific variability.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included 419 patients who underwent lobectomies for NSCLC. Pulmonary function tests measuring forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were conducted preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. We compared the observed pulmonary function values to the predicted postoperative (PPO) values based on the traditional segmental method and analysed lobe-specific differences using mixed-effects models.

Results: Left upper and right lower lobectomies demonstrated observed pulmonary function values similar to their PPOs as early as 2 weeks postoperatively. However, the other lobes declined significantly, with an approximately 25% reduction in FVC, FEV1, and DLCO, regardless of the number of segments in the lobe. Three months postoperatively, observed pulmonary function values exceeded PPO values across all lobes. Surgical approach (open vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery), right upper lobectomy in the reference to right lower lobectomy, and postoperative decreased physical activity were significant factors related to the non-recovery of lung function to their PPOs at 6 months after surgery.

Conclusion: Postoperative pulmonary function recovery varied significantly by resected lobe, with most lobes showing better recovery than predicted postoperative values. Accurate outcome prediction requires accounting for lobe-specific characteristics and compensatory mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respirology
Respirology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Respirology is a journal of international standing, publishing peer-reviewed articles of scientific excellence in clinical and clinically-relevant experimental respiratory biology and disease. Fields of research include immunology, intensive and critical care, epidemiology, cell and molecular biology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, paediatric respiratory medicine, clinical trials, interventional pulmonology and thoracic surgery. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and publishes papers in the following categories: Original Articles, Editorials, Reviews, and Correspondences. Respirology is the preferred journal of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, has been adopted as the preferred English journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society and the Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and is an official journal of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信