坦桑尼亚初级卫生保健的妇幼保健服务质量:2021-2022年星级评估

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Erick S Kinyenje, Martin M Degeh, Joseph C Hokororo, Syabo M Mwaisengela, Ruth R Ngowi, Omary A Nassoro, Chrisogone J German, Radenta P Bahegwa, Yohanes S Msigwa, Atuganile Musyani, Laura E Marandu, Michael Habtu, Jennifer T Mbise, Habibu Ismail, Janeth Masuma, Faraja Msemwa, Joanita Muruve, Saturini Manangwa, Daudi Msasi, Jimmy Mbelwa, Athman Pembe, Ahmad M Makuwani, Ntuli A Kapologwe, Tumaini J Nagu, Eliudi S Eliakimu
{"title":"坦桑尼亚初级卫生保健的妇幼保健服务质量:2021-2022年星级评估","authors":"Erick S Kinyenje, Martin M Degeh, Joseph C Hokororo, Syabo M Mwaisengela, Ruth R Ngowi, Omary A Nassoro, Chrisogone J German, Radenta P Bahegwa, Yohanes S Msigwa, Atuganile Musyani, Laura E Marandu, Michael Habtu, Jennifer T Mbise, Habibu Ismail, Janeth Masuma, Faraja Msemwa, Joanita Muruve, Saturini Manangwa, Daudi Msasi, Jimmy Mbelwa, Athman Pembe, Ahmad M Makuwani, Ntuli A Kapologwe, Tumaini J Nagu, Eliudi S Eliakimu","doi":"10.1186/s12978-025-02105-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tanzania faces high maternal and infant mortality rates, yet key service quality metrics remain underexamined, limiting targeted improvements. Star Rating Assessment (SRA), introduced in 2015, aims to improve primary health care (PHC) quality, including maternal and child health (MCH) services. This study analyses SRA data to assess the prevalence of PHC quality in MCH and its associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this cross-sectional study were collected from November 2021 to March 2022 across 10 regions. The tool used included 12 MCH-related indicators, each comprising specific criteria. Facilities scoring ≥ 80% across these criteria were considered to meet MCH quality standards, which was the primary study outcome. A descriptive analysis of indicator performance was conducted, followed by multivariate logistic regression to assess characteristics associated with achieving the quality standard. Results are reported as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,583 facilities assessed: 2,189 dispensaries (84.7%), 303 health centres (11.7%), and 91 district-level hospitals (3.5%). Only 280(10.8%) met the MCH quality standards. Maternal audit and review practices aligned with guidelines in 2,057 facilities (79.6%). Moderate adherence was observed for family planning guidelines (48.3%), accurate partogram completion (47.9%), and immunisation standards (46.3%). Major gaps included cervical cancer screening, offered by 199 facilities (7.7%), and essential obstetric medicines, available in 424 facilities (16.4%). Among 394 hospitals and health centres, only 60(15.2%) offered postnatal and essential newborn care with dedicated neonatal and Kangaroo Mother Care spaces. Compliance was higher in public, rural, and higher-level facilities. Nurse availability, functional management, and quality improvement teams were key predictors of MCH quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of MCH services in Tanzania varies widely by facility type, ownership, nurse staffing, and management functionality. Targeted improvements in cervical cancer screening, emergency obstetric care, and newborn care are essential to raise overall MCH service standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":"22 1","pages":"180"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of maternal and child health services in Tanzanian primary healthcare: a 2021-2022 star rating review.\",\"authors\":\"Erick S Kinyenje, Martin M Degeh, Joseph C Hokororo, Syabo M Mwaisengela, Ruth R Ngowi, Omary A Nassoro, Chrisogone J German, Radenta P Bahegwa, Yohanes S Msigwa, Atuganile Musyani, Laura E Marandu, Michael Habtu, Jennifer T Mbise, Habibu Ismail, Janeth Masuma, Faraja Msemwa, Joanita Muruve, Saturini Manangwa, Daudi Msasi, Jimmy Mbelwa, Athman Pembe, Ahmad M Makuwani, Ntuli A Kapologwe, Tumaini J Nagu, Eliudi S Eliakimu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12978-025-02105-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tanzania faces high maternal and infant mortality rates, yet key service quality metrics remain underexamined, limiting targeted improvements. Star Rating Assessment (SRA), introduced in 2015, aims to improve primary health care (PHC) quality, including maternal and child health (MCH) services. This study analyses SRA data to assess the prevalence of PHC quality in MCH and its associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this cross-sectional study were collected from November 2021 to March 2022 across 10 regions. The tool used included 12 MCH-related indicators, each comprising specific criteria. Facilities scoring ≥ 80% across these criteria were considered to meet MCH quality standards, which was the primary study outcome. A descriptive analysis of indicator performance was conducted, followed by multivariate logistic regression to assess characteristics associated with achieving the quality standard. Results are reported as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,583 facilities assessed: 2,189 dispensaries (84.7%), 303 health centres (11.7%), and 91 district-level hospitals (3.5%). Only 280(10.8%) met the MCH quality standards. Maternal audit and review practices aligned with guidelines in 2,057 facilities (79.6%). Moderate adherence was observed for family planning guidelines (48.3%), accurate partogram completion (47.9%), and immunisation standards (46.3%). Major gaps included cervical cancer screening, offered by 199 facilities (7.7%), and essential obstetric medicines, available in 424 facilities (16.4%). Among 394 hospitals and health centres, only 60(15.2%) offered postnatal and essential newborn care with dedicated neonatal and Kangaroo Mother Care spaces. Compliance was higher in public, rural, and higher-level facilities. Nurse availability, functional management, and quality improvement teams were key predictors of MCH quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of MCH services in Tanzania varies widely by facility type, ownership, nurse staffing, and management functionality. Targeted improvements in cervical cancer screening, emergency obstetric care, and newborn care are essential to raise overall MCH service standards.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Health\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486962/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-025-02105-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-025-02105-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:坦桑尼亚的孕产妇和婴儿死亡率很高,但关键的服务质量指标仍未得到充分审查,限制了有针对性的改进。星级评估(SRA)于2015年推出,旨在提高初级卫生保健(PHC)质量,包括孕产妇和儿童健康(MCH)服务。本研究分析SRA数据,以评估妇幼保健中初级保健质量的普遍性及其相关因素。方法:本横断面研究的数据收集于2021年11月至2022年3月,横跨10个地区。所使用的工具包括12个与妇幼保健有关的指标,每个指标都包括具体标准。在这些标准中得分≥80%的设施被认为符合MCH质量标准,这是主要研究结果。对指标表现进行了描述性分析,随后进行了多变量逻辑回归,以评估与达到质量标准相关的特征。结果以校正优势比(AOR)报告,95%置信区间(CI)。结果:共评估了2,583个设施:2,189个药房(84.7%)、303个保健中心(11.7%)和91个区级医院(3.5%)。只有280例(10.8%)符合MCH质量标准。2057家机构(79.6%)的孕产妇审计和审查做法符合指导方针。中等程度遵守计划生育指南(48.3%),准确完成分娩(47.9%)和免疫标准(46.3%)。主要差距包括199个设施(7.7%)提供宫颈癌筛查,424个设施(16.4%)提供基本产科药物。在394家医院和保健中心中,只有60家(15.2%)提供产后和基本新生儿护理,设有专门的新生儿和袋鼠妈妈护理室。公共、农村和更高级别设施的合规程度更高。护士可用性、功能管理和质量改进团队是妇幼保健质量的关键预测因素。结论:坦桑尼亚妇幼保健服务质量因设施类型、所有权、护士配备和管理功能而有很大差异。有针对性地改进宫颈癌筛查、产科急诊和新生儿护理,对于提高妇幼保健整体服务标准至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of maternal and child health services in Tanzanian primary healthcare: a 2021-2022 star rating review.

Background: Tanzania faces high maternal and infant mortality rates, yet key service quality metrics remain underexamined, limiting targeted improvements. Star Rating Assessment (SRA), introduced in 2015, aims to improve primary health care (PHC) quality, including maternal and child health (MCH) services. This study analyses SRA data to assess the prevalence of PHC quality in MCH and its associated factors.

Methods: Data for this cross-sectional study were collected from November 2021 to March 2022 across 10 regions. The tool used included 12 MCH-related indicators, each comprising specific criteria. Facilities scoring ≥ 80% across these criteria were considered to meet MCH quality standards, which was the primary study outcome. A descriptive analysis of indicator performance was conducted, followed by multivariate logistic regression to assess characteristics associated with achieving the quality standard. Results are reported as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: A total of 2,583 facilities assessed: 2,189 dispensaries (84.7%), 303 health centres (11.7%), and 91 district-level hospitals (3.5%). Only 280(10.8%) met the MCH quality standards. Maternal audit and review practices aligned with guidelines in 2,057 facilities (79.6%). Moderate adherence was observed for family planning guidelines (48.3%), accurate partogram completion (47.9%), and immunisation standards (46.3%). Major gaps included cervical cancer screening, offered by 199 facilities (7.7%), and essential obstetric medicines, available in 424 facilities (16.4%). Among 394 hospitals and health centres, only 60(15.2%) offered postnatal and essential newborn care with dedicated neonatal and Kangaroo Mother Care spaces. Compliance was higher in public, rural, and higher-level facilities. Nurse availability, functional management, and quality improvement teams were key predictors of MCH quality.

Conclusion: The quality of MCH services in Tanzania varies widely by facility type, ownership, nurse staffing, and management functionality. Targeted improvements in cervical cancer screening, emergency obstetric care, and newborn care are essential to raise overall MCH service standards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信