Kerri A Pierz, Whitley Aamodt, Caroline Gochanour, Ryan Kurth, Michael C Brumm, Christopher S Coffey, Laura E Heathers, Michelle Totten, Richard L Doty, Kenneth Marek, Andrew Siderowf
{"title":"对16972名60岁及以上的人进行了修订后的宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试,百分位数得分。","authors":"Kerri A Pierz, Whitley Aamodt, Caroline Gochanour, Ryan Kurth, Michael C Brumm, Christopher S Coffey, Laura E Heathers, Michelle Totten, Richard L Doty, Kenneth Marek, Andrew Siderowf","doi":"10.1038/s41531-025-01095-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study goal was to use a very large study cohort to establish normative data for the revised UPSIT (UPSIT-R) and to compare the resultant percentiles to those of the original UPSIT. A second study was performed to compare the performance of these two tests in a cohort of persons with and without Parkinson's disease (PD). UPSIT-R percentiles were derived by age and sex in 16,972 volunteers. Non-parametric statistics were employed to compare the results of those with and without PD. UPSIT-R performance declined with increasing age; deficits were more pronounced in men than women. The magnitude of the difference between the original and revised test percentile scores differed by age and sex. Olfactory deficits in PD were confirmed on the UPSIT-R. This study provides normative data clinically useful for assessing the relative degree of dysfunction in persons 60 years of age and older using the UPSIT-R. Trial Registration Information: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05065060 .</p>","PeriodicalId":19706,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","volume":"11 1","pages":"280"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percentile scores for the revised University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for 16,972 individuals 60 years of age and older.\",\"authors\":\"Kerri A Pierz, Whitley Aamodt, Caroline Gochanour, Ryan Kurth, Michael C Brumm, Christopher S Coffey, Laura E Heathers, Michelle Totten, Richard L Doty, Kenneth Marek, Andrew Siderowf\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41531-025-01095-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study goal was to use a very large study cohort to establish normative data for the revised UPSIT (UPSIT-R) and to compare the resultant percentiles to those of the original UPSIT. A second study was performed to compare the performance of these two tests in a cohort of persons with and without Parkinson's disease (PD). UPSIT-R percentiles were derived by age and sex in 16,972 volunteers. Non-parametric statistics were employed to compare the results of those with and without PD. UPSIT-R performance declined with increasing age; deficits were more pronounced in men than women. The magnitude of the difference between the original and revised test percentile scores differed by age and sex. Olfactory deficits in PD were confirmed on the UPSIT-R. This study provides normative data clinically useful for assessing the relative degree of dysfunction in persons 60 years of age and older using the UPSIT-R. Trial Registration Information: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05065060 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Parkinson's Disease\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488959/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Parkinson's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-01095-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-01095-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Percentile scores for the revised University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for 16,972 individuals 60 years of age and older.
The study goal was to use a very large study cohort to establish normative data for the revised UPSIT (UPSIT-R) and to compare the resultant percentiles to those of the original UPSIT. A second study was performed to compare the performance of these two tests in a cohort of persons with and without Parkinson's disease (PD). UPSIT-R percentiles were derived by age and sex in 16,972 volunteers. Non-parametric statistics were employed to compare the results of those with and without PD. UPSIT-R performance declined with increasing age; deficits were more pronounced in men than women. The magnitude of the difference between the original and revised test percentile scores differed by age and sex. Olfactory deficits in PD were confirmed on the UPSIT-R. This study provides normative data clinically useful for assessing the relative degree of dysfunction in persons 60 years of age and older using the UPSIT-R. Trial Registration Information: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05065060 .
期刊介绍:
npj Parkinson's Disease is a comprehensive open access journal that covers a wide range of research areas related to Parkinson's disease. It publishes original studies in basic science, translational research, and clinical investigations. The journal is dedicated to advancing our understanding of Parkinson's disease by exploring various aspects such as anatomy, etiology, genetics, cellular and molecular physiology, neurophysiology, epidemiology, and therapeutic development. By providing free and immediate access to the scientific and Parkinson's disease community, npj Parkinson's Disease promotes collaboration and knowledge sharing among researchers and healthcare professionals.