美国眼科学会年会演讲嘉宾的行业财务关系,重点是咨询师。

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Roni M Shtein, Kerby Shedden, Alyssa A Horstman, Paul R Lichter
{"title":"美国眼科学会年会演讲嘉宾的行业财务关系,重点是咨询师。","authors":"Roni M Shtein, Kerby Shedden, Alyssa A Horstman, Paul R Lichter","doi":"10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.09.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess industry financial relationships of ophthalmologist presenters at the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Annual Meeting between 2016 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study PARTICIPANTS: Program presenters from AAO Annual Meetings, 2016 - 2020 METHODS: From the AAO Annual Meeting programs, we determined individual meeting participants and the number of papers, posters, courses and symposia they presented. National Provider Identifier (NPI) numbers were obtained for all participants who had them. The CMS Open Payments Database (OPD) was used to obtain information about physician industry payments from 2016-2020. NPI numbers were used to allow for analysis directly comparing AAO participation and industry payment information by calendar year. Summary statistics were tabulated by year. Linear regression models were used to assess the relationship between participation and payments and between participation and year to assess for time-varying relationships between participation and payments.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The association of industry payments to AAO Annual Meeting presenters, especially industry consultants, for symposia, courses, papers, and posters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 811 distinct program participants who had NPI numbers, with 1584 records of participation over the 5 years studied. Presenters could have multiple participations in each annual meeting. Overall, meeting participants without NPI numbers (presumably meeting participants who do not practice medicine in the US) had a higher proportion of poster presentations and a lower proportion of symposia participation. Most presenters (67-74%) at the AAO Annual Meeting received payments from industry in the same year they presented at the AAO Annual Meeting. AAO Annual Meeting presenters who received industry funding characterized as \"consulting\" in the OPD received higher median payment amounts. Although there was no evidence of change in total OPD payments over the years studied, consulting payments to AAO Annual Meeting participants increased 20% per year (p<0.01) from 2016-2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most AAO Annual Meeting presenters have financial relationships with industry. Increased financial transparency required by the Affordable Care Act has not reduced physician financial relationships with industry. There is a higher proportion and higher amounts of industry money given to presenters in symposia, compared to poster presenters. Industry financial relationships are correlated with participation in symposia and courses at AAO Annual Meetings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19533,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Industry Financial Relationships of Presenters at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting with an Emphasis on Consultants.\",\"authors\":\"Roni M Shtein, Kerby Shedden, Alyssa A Horstman, Paul R Lichter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.09.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess industry financial relationships of ophthalmologist presenters at the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Annual Meeting between 2016 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study PARTICIPANTS: Program presenters from AAO Annual Meetings, 2016 - 2020 METHODS: From the AAO Annual Meeting programs, we determined individual meeting participants and the number of papers, posters, courses and symposia they presented. National Provider Identifier (NPI) numbers were obtained for all participants who had them. The CMS Open Payments Database (OPD) was used to obtain information about physician industry payments from 2016-2020. NPI numbers were used to allow for analysis directly comparing AAO participation and industry payment information by calendar year. Summary statistics were tabulated by year. Linear regression models were used to assess the relationship between participation and payments and between participation and year to assess for time-varying relationships between participation and payments.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The association of industry payments to AAO Annual Meeting presenters, especially industry consultants, for symposia, courses, papers, and posters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 811 distinct program participants who had NPI numbers, with 1584 records of participation over the 5 years studied. Presenters could have multiple participations in each annual meeting. Overall, meeting participants without NPI numbers (presumably meeting participants who do not practice medicine in the US) had a higher proportion of poster presentations and a lower proportion of symposia participation. Most presenters (67-74%) at the AAO Annual Meeting received payments from industry in the same year they presented at the AAO Annual Meeting. AAO Annual Meeting presenters who received industry funding characterized as \\\"consulting\\\" in the OPD received higher median payment amounts. Although there was no evidence of change in total OPD payments over the years studied, consulting payments to AAO Annual Meeting participants increased 20% per year (p<0.01) from 2016-2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most AAO Annual Meeting presenters have financial relationships with industry. Increased financial transparency required by the Affordable Care Act has not reduced physician financial relationships with industry. There is a higher proportion and higher amounts of industry money given to presenters in symposia, compared to poster presenters. Industry financial relationships are correlated with participation in symposia and courses at AAO Annual Meetings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.09.016\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.09.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估2016年至2020年美国眼科学会(AAO)年会上眼科医生的行业财务关系。方法:从AAO年会计划中,我们确定了个别会议参与者以及他们发表的论文、海报、课程和专题讨论会的数量。获得了所有拥有国家供应商标识符(NPI)号码的参与者。使用CMS开放支付数据库(OPD)获取2016-2020年医师行业支付信息。NPI数字用于允许按日历年直接比较AAO参与和行业支付信息的分析。汇总统计数据按年制成表格。线性回归模型用于评估参与与支付之间的关系,以及参与与年份之间的关系,以评估参与与支付之间的时变关系。主要结果测量:行业协会支付给AAO年会演讲者,特别是行业顾问,用于专题讨论会、课程、论文和海报。结果:有811个不同的项目参与者有NPI号码,在5年的研究中有1584个参与记录。演讲者可以在每次年度会议中有多个参与者。总体而言,没有NPI号码的会议参与者(假设在美国没有行医的会议参与者)有更高比例的海报展示和更低比例的专题讨论会参与。在AAO年会上发言的大多数人(67-74%)在他们在AAO年会上发言的同一年收到了业界的报酬。在OPD中,获得行业资助的AAO年会主持人被描述为“咨询”,他们获得的支付金额中位数较高。尽管在研究的这些年里,OPD支付总额没有变化的证据,但AAO年会参与者的咨询费每年增长20%(结论:大多数AAO年会的演讲者与行业有财务关系。《平价医疗法案》(Affordable Care Act)所要求的增加财务透明度并没有减少医生与产业界的财务关系。与海报上的演讲者相比,研讨会上的演讲者获得的行业资金比例和金额更高。行业财务关系与参加AAO年会的专题讨论会和课程相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Industry Financial Relationships of Presenters at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting with an Emphasis on Consultants.

Objective: To assess industry financial relationships of ophthalmologist presenters at the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Annual Meeting between 2016 and 2020.

Design: Cross-sectional study PARTICIPANTS: Program presenters from AAO Annual Meetings, 2016 - 2020 METHODS: From the AAO Annual Meeting programs, we determined individual meeting participants and the number of papers, posters, courses and symposia they presented. National Provider Identifier (NPI) numbers were obtained for all participants who had them. The CMS Open Payments Database (OPD) was used to obtain information about physician industry payments from 2016-2020. NPI numbers were used to allow for analysis directly comparing AAO participation and industry payment information by calendar year. Summary statistics were tabulated by year. Linear regression models were used to assess the relationship between participation and payments and between participation and year to assess for time-varying relationships between participation and payments.

Main outcome measure: The association of industry payments to AAO Annual Meeting presenters, especially industry consultants, for symposia, courses, papers, and posters.

Results: There were 811 distinct program participants who had NPI numbers, with 1584 records of participation over the 5 years studied. Presenters could have multiple participations in each annual meeting. Overall, meeting participants without NPI numbers (presumably meeting participants who do not practice medicine in the US) had a higher proportion of poster presentations and a lower proportion of symposia participation. Most presenters (67-74%) at the AAO Annual Meeting received payments from industry in the same year they presented at the AAO Annual Meeting. AAO Annual Meeting presenters who received industry funding characterized as "consulting" in the OPD received higher median payment amounts. Although there was no evidence of change in total OPD payments over the years studied, consulting payments to AAO Annual Meeting participants increased 20% per year (p<0.01) from 2016-2019.

Conclusion: Most AAO Annual Meeting presenters have financial relationships with industry. Increased financial transparency required by the Affordable Care Act has not reduced physician financial relationships with industry. There is a higher proportion and higher amounts of industry money given to presenters in symposia, compared to poster presenters. Industry financial relationships are correlated with participation in symposia and courses at AAO Annual Meetings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ophthalmology, from the American Academy of Ophthalmology, contributes to society by publishing research in clinical and basic science related to vision.It upholds excellence through unbiased peer-review, fostering innovation, promoting discovery, and encouraging lifelong learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信