评估乳房x线摄影密度对改善基于问卷和多基因因素的乳腺癌风险模型的贡献。

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Charlotta V Mulder, Xin Yang, Yon Ho Jee, Christopher G Scott, Chi Gao, Yu Cao, Amber N Hurson, Mikael Eriksson, Celine M Vachon, Per Hall, Antonis C Antoniou, Peter Kraft, Gretchen L Gierach, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Parichoy Pal Choudhury
{"title":"评估乳房x线摄影密度对改善基于问卷和多基因因素的乳腺癌风险模型的贡献。","authors":"Charlotta V Mulder, Xin Yang, Yon Ho Jee, Christopher G Scott, Chi Gao, Yu Cao, Amber N Hurson, Mikael Eriksson, Celine M Vachon, Per Hall, Antonis C Antoniou, Peter Kraft, Gretchen L Gierach, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Parichoy Pal Choudhury","doi":"10.1038/s41523-025-00813-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Incorporation of mammographic density into breast cancer risk models may improve risk stratification for tailored screening and prevention. We evaluated the added value of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density to a validated model combining questionnaire-based risk factors and a 313-variant polygenic risk score (PRS), using the Individualized Coherent Absolute Risk Estimator (iCARE) tool for risk model building and validation. Calibration and discrimination were assessed in three prospective cohorts of European-ancestry women (1468 cases, 19,104 controls): US-based Nurses' Health Study (NHS I and II) and Mayo Mammography Health Study (MMHS); and Sweden-based Karolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA) study. Analyses were stratified by age (<50, ≥50 years). Adding density modestly improved discrimination: among younger women, AUC increased from 65.6% (95% CI: 61.9-69.3%) to 67.0% (95% CI: 63.5-70.6%); among older women, from 65.5% (95% CI: 63.8-67.2%) to 66.1% (95% CI 64.4-67.8%). Among US women aged 50-70 years, 18.4% were identified at ≥3% 5-year risk with density included, capturing 42.4% of future cases; 7.9% were reclassified, identifying 2.8% more future cases. In Sweden, 10.3% were identified at elevated risk, capturing 29.4% of cases, with 5.3% reclassified and 4.4% more cases identified. Integrating density with established risk factors and PRS may enhance breast cancer risk stratification among European-ancestry women, supporting its potential for clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":19247,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Breast Cancer","volume":"11 1","pages":"106"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating mammographic density's contribution to improve a breast cancer risk model with questionnaire-based and polygenic factors.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotta V Mulder, Xin Yang, Yon Ho Jee, Christopher G Scott, Chi Gao, Yu Cao, Amber N Hurson, Mikael Eriksson, Celine M Vachon, Per Hall, Antonis C Antoniou, Peter Kraft, Gretchen L Gierach, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Parichoy Pal Choudhury\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41523-025-00813-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Incorporation of mammographic density into breast cancer risk models may improve risk stratification for tailored screening and prevention. We evaluated the added value of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density to a validated model combining questionnaire-based risk factors and a 313-variant polygenic risk score (PRS), using the Individualized Coherent Absolute Risk Estimator (iCARE) tool for risk model building and validation. Calibration and discrimination were assessed in three prospective cohorts of European-ancestry women (1468 cases, 19,104 controls): US-based Nurses' Health Study (NHS I and II) and Mayo Mammography Health Study (MMHS); and Sweden-based Karolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA) study. Analyses were stratified by age (<50, ≥50 years). Adding density modestly improved discrimination: among younger women, AUC increased from 65.6% (95% CI: 61.9-69.3%) to 67.0% (95% CI: 63.5-70.6%); among older women, from 65.5% (95% CI: 63.8-67.2%) to 66.1% (95% CI 64.4-67.8%). Among US women aged 50-70 years, 18.4% were identified at ≥3% 5-year risk with density included, capturing 42.4% of future cases; 7.9% were reclassified, identifying 2.8% more future cases. In Sweden, 10.3% were identified at elevated risk, capturing 29.4% of cases, with 5.3% reclassified and 4.4% more cases identified. Integrating density with established risk factors and PRS may enhance breast cancer risk stratification among European-ancestry women, supporting its potential for clinical utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Breast Cancer\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488985/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Breast Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-025-00813-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-025-00813-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将乳房x线摄影密度纳入乳腺癌风险模型可以改善风险分层,以便进行针对性筛查和预防。我们评估了乳房成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)乳房密度对一个验证模型的附加价值,该模型结合了基于问卷的风险因素和313个变异的多基因风险评分(PRS),使用个性化一致绝对风险估计器(iCARE)工具进行风险模型的建立和验证。在欧洲血统女性的三个前瞻性队列(1468例,19104例对照)中评估校准和区分:美国护士健康研究(NHS I和II)和梅奥乳房x光检查健康研究(MMHS);以及瑞典卡罗林斯卡乳房x线摄影乳腺癌风险预测项目(KARMA)研究。分析按年龄(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating mammographic density's contribution to improve a breast cancer risk model with questionnaire-based and polygenic factors.

Incorporation of mammographic density into breast cancer risk models may improve risk stratification for tailored screening and prevention. We evaluated the added value of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density to a validated model combining questionnaire-based risk factors and a 313-variant polygenic risk score (PRS), using the Individualized Coherent Absolute Risk Estimator (iCARE) tool for risk model building and validation. Calibration and discrimination were assessed in three prospective cohorts of European-ancestry women (1468 cases, 19,104 controls): US-based Nurses' Health Study (NHS I and II) and Mayo Mammography Health Study (MMHS); and Sweden-based Karolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA) study. Analyses were stratified by age (<50, ≥50 years). Adding density modestly improved discrimination: among younger women, AUC increased from 65.6% (95% CI: 61.9-69.3%) to 67.0% (95% CI: 63.5-70.6%); among older women, from 65.5% (95% CI: 63.8-67.2%) to 66.1% (95% CI 64.4-67.8%). Among US women aged 50-70 years, 18.4% were identified at ≥3% 5-year risk with density included, capturing 42.4% of future cases; 7.9% were reclassified, identifying 2.8% more future cases. In Sweden, 10.3% were identified at elevated risk, capturing 29.4% of cases, with 5.3% reclassified and 4.4% more cases identified. Integrating density with established risk factors and PRS may enhance breast cancer risk stratification among European-ancestry women, supporting its potential for clinical utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Breast Cancer
NPJ Breast Cancer Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Breast Cancer publishes original research articles, reviews, brief correspondence, meeting reports, editorial summaries and hypothesis generating observations which could be unexplained or preliminary findings from experiments, novel ideas, or the framing of new questions that need to be solved. Featured topics of the journal include imaging, immunotherapy, molecular classification of disease, mechanism-based therapies largely targeting signal transduction pathways, carcinogenesis including hereditary susceptibility and molecular epidemiology, survivorship issues including long-term toxicities of treatment and secondary neoplasm occurrence, the biophysics of cancer, mechanisms of metastasis and their perturbation, and studies of the tumor microenvironment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信